StarGateWars Forums

Thank you

~Dä Vinci~ wrote:Just got myself a free 500t farm and 150m uu

Nice! Who was it?

The few I mass is the few not returning any masses.
shame on you as I dont have any OE masses in my logs
So
*Het Licht Van Weleer massed and then moved to spy cs's for TAF and found RAZERWIRE had the balls to train up and got massed too( Mathlords work)
So need more CS's to mass peoples so train up.

Unsterblich wrote:The few I mass is the few not returning any masses.
shame on you as I dont have any OE masses in my logs
So
*Het Licht Van Weleer massed and then moved to spy cs's for TAF and found RAZERWIRE had the balls to train up and got massed too( Mathlords work)
So need more CS's to mass peoples so train up.

On sunday I burned all my ATs on ascended on both accounts on leveling 4 TAF accounts and 2 FS accounts (CS + def) and then 2 more TAF accounts just CS. And I actually was doubting you were still in TAF seeing you didnt had any tag on, so I moved past yours...

And even then I still had to leave other accounts becaus the ATs were gone. Not my fault you all gang up in TAF...

Heisenberg wrote:

~Wilco~ wrote:spot the difference

[spoiler][/spoiler]

[spoiler][/spoiler]

Well done cold lazarus

Don't believe those can be your screenshots? 1 tab and no porn James? So disappointed in you...

only 350t in the bank Wilco? i thought TAF was rich?

GL Merc1

Unsterblich wrote:The few I mass is the few not returning any masses.
shame on you as I dont have any OE masses in my logs
So
*Het Licht Van Weleer massed and then moved to spy cs's for TAF and found RAZERWIRE had the balls to train up and got massed too( Mathlords work)
So need more CS's to mass peoples so train up.

lol don't mock people when you yourself only have a 12q defense. if you want people to mass you then give them something to mass that isn't solely a command star.

And you have a 1 quad defense...so I don't think you have any room to talk about 12 quad defenses

Mathlord wrote:And you have a 1 quad defense...so I don't think you have any room to talk about 12 quad defenses

i'm not the one complaining about the lack of massing

Commander Vimes wrote:

Mathlord wrote:And you have a 1 quad defense...so I don't think you have any room to talk about 12 quad defenses

i'm not the one complaining about the lack of massing

Commander Vimes wrote:you yourself only have a 12q defense.

Only insinuates that you are moaning. Please excuse Math if your lack of clarity has resulted in this unfortunate misunderstanding.

p.s I would be really happy to see a 12q defence to play with. Alas, to date, I have not.

Field Marshall wrote:

Commander Vimes wrote:

Mathlord wrote:And you have a 1 quad defense...so I don't think you have any room to talk about 12 quad defenses

i'm not the one complaining about the lack of massing

Commander Vimes wrote:you yourself only have a 12q defense.

Only insinuates that you are moaning. Please excuse Math if your lack of clarity has resulted in this unfortunate misunderstanding.

p.s I would be really happy to see a 12q defence to play with. Alas, to date, I have not.

just pointing out how ridiculous unsterblich's argument was lol
i haven't built anything on ascended since the early days of the war, largely because i didn't want to give the OFIS cheats anything to mass.

Commander Vimes wrote:

Field Marshall wrote:

Commander Vimes wrote:

Mathlord wrote:And you have a 1 quad defense...so I don't think you have any room to talk about 12 quad defenses

i'm not the one complaining about the lack of massing

Commander Vimes wrote:you yourself only have a 12q defense.

Only insinuates that you are moaning. Please excuse Math if your lack of clarity has resulted in this unfortunate misunderstanding.

p.s I would be really happy to see a 12q defence to play with. Alas, to date, I have not.

just pointing out how ridiculous unsterblich's argument was lol
i haven't built anything on ascended since the early days of the war, largely because i didn't want to give the OFIS cheats anything to mass.

For the record, I am now complaining about your lack of defence. I have also produced a defence, which should justify my complaining.

Commander Vimes wrote:

Field Marshall wrote:

Commander Vimes wrote:

Mathlord wrote:And you have a 1 quad defense...so I don't think you have any room to talk about 12 quad defenses

i'm not the one complaining about the lack of massing

Commander Vimes wrote:you yourself only have a 12q defense.

Only insinuates that you are moaning. Please excuse Math if your lack of clarity has resulted in this unfortunate misunderstanding.

p.s I would be really happy to see a 12q defence to play with. Alas, to date, I have not.

just pointing out how ridiculous unsterblich's argument was lol
i haven't built anything on ascended since the early days of the war, largely because i didn't want to give the OFIS cheats anything to mass.

If your defense is only 1 quad, you don't really have room to complain about his defense at 12 quad being too low to complain about a lack of defenses in OE and DDE to play with.

Whew. That was a mouthful of a sentence.

I have a new idea. We're going to keep complaining about your statless asses and maybe you will be inspired to build something to prove us wrong.

Also, cute with the OFIS cheats line. Keep that up and I'll have to go back to calling you guys bug abusers. No that doesn't work because you do abuse bugs and OFIS doesn't cheat. Oh well, guess I'll call you guys bug abusers anyway

Mathlord wrote:

Commander Vimes wrote:

Field Marshall wrote:

Commander Vimes wrote:

Mathlord wrote:And you have a 1 quad defense...so I don't think you have any room to talk about 12 quad defenses

i'm not the one complaining about the lack of massing

Commander Vimes wrote:you yourself only have a 12q defense.

Only insinuates that you are moaning. Please excuse Math if your lack of clarity has resulted in this unfortunate misunderstanding.

p.s I would be really happy to see a 12q defence to play with. Alas, to date, I have not.

just pointing out how ridiculous unsterblich's argument was lol
i haven't built anything on ascended since the early days of the war, largely because i didn't want to give the OFIS cheats anything to mass.

If your defense is only 1 quad, you don't really have room to complain about his defense at 12 quad being too low to complain about a lack of defenses in OE and DDE to play with.

Whew. That was a mouthful of a sentence.

I have a new idea. We're going to keep complaining about your statless asses and maybe you will be inspired to build something to prove us wrong.

Also, cute with the OFIS cheats line. Keep that up and I'll have to go back to calling you guys bug abusers. No that doesn't work because you do abuse bugs and OFIS doesn't cheat. Oh well, guess I'll call you guys bug abusers anyway

lol i wasn't complaining, just making an observation

what they did is no secret, as for who does or doesn't use bugs/scripts etc i have no idea.
there's probably people in every empire that do or have tried, none of them will admit to it though so it's a moot point really.
admin won't punish those that do anyway so we may as well all do it lmao

this better? Defensive Power 3,903,567,552,000,000

Commander Vimes wrote:this better? Defensive Power 3,903,567,552,000,000

Better, it's gone. Thank you.