StarGateWars Forums

What are the 6 houses and the attributes they give?

Disciples of Chaos - 10% attack bonus
Disciples of Order - 10% defence bonus
Disciples of Light - 8% increased AC
Disciples of Shadow - 12% increased Covert
Disciples of Faith - 10% increase to chance of Ascended Blessing
Disciples of Science - 100% chance to negate Ascended Blessing

Baxter wrote:Disciples of Chaos - 10% attack bonus
Disciples of Order - 10% defence bonus
Disciples of Light - 8% increased AC
Disciples of Shadow - 12% increased Covert
Disciples of Faith - 10% increase to chance of Ascended Blessing
Disciples of Science - 100% chance to negate Ascended Blessing

Total = 150% chance of hurting the game even further...

a 'bug':
if an alliance isnt in a house, its citizenship isnt shown in the alliance and house rankings page
might be an idea to have that showing too

Military exp is still bugged, it still shows double in total ME of the temp ME records...

Also the bug about ascended titles not displaying completly is still to observe...

Sarevok wrote:

Legendary Jimster wrote:

Unimatrix881 wrote:Disciples of Science
BONUS:100 Percent Negates All Ascended Blessings In Battle

Okay, well I can understand having some of the houses around, but it's really unreasonable to throw in this one. You would be negating the work that some players worked long and hard for, and invested tons of resources into getting those extra ascensions so they could have a little advantage.

Think about unascended players.

Exactly. Then unascended players would have a unique tech advantage. Though you still get to keep your what, +49% stat boost over them

I personally love it. Means that, if your defence is large enough, they MUST build a bigger attack, rather then just wait for them to get blessed, and you to not be. Especially if you decided to stay at LG+1, due to a large UP or covert levels.

and what if you nuked your "large UP" and covert levels to ascend further because that was the choice at the time? People too lazy to ascend should not be rewarded further IMO

Legendary Jimster wrote:Military exp is still bugged, it still shows double in total ME of the temp ME records...
Also the bug about ascended titles not displaying completly is still to observe...

I wish...

renegadze wrote:and what if you nuked your "large UP" and covert levels to ascend further because that was the choice at the time? People too lazy to ascend should not be rewarded further IMO

They don't, i think that having a 24% dis-advantage in their race specialisation and a 49% disadvatage in every other aspect, along with stronger weapons, should be enough shouldn't it?

Sarevok wrote:

Legendary Jimster wrote:Military exp is still bugged, it still shows double in total ME of the temp ME records...
Also the bug about ascended titles not displaying completly is still to observe...

I wish...

renegadze wrote:and what if you nuked your "large UP" and covert levels to ascend further because that was the choice at the time? People too lazy to ascend should not be rewarded further IMO

They don't, i think that having a 24% dis-advantage in their race specialisation and a 49% disadvatage in every other aspect, along with stronger weapons, should be enough shouldn't it?

No, they choose not to ascend. You can make choices...and that leads to wherever it ends

Calibretto wrote:No, they choose not to ascend. You can make choices...and that leads to wherever it ends

And why should one persons choice be favoured over others?

Sarevok wrote:

Calibretto wrote:No, they choose not to ascend. You can make choices...and that leads to wherever it ends

And why should one persons choice be favoured over others?

isnt the game made up of choices. isnt the main choice here that i can think of "weather to ascend or not... "
or weather to raid rather tha have a huge up...or go to perg... i belive its the same sort of choice


aslong as their is some sort of balance

Sarevok wrote:

Calibretto wrote:No, they choose not to ascend. You can make choices...and that leads to wherever it ends

And why should one persons choice be favoured over others?

You can do yourself a favour by making choices. But the choice is yours to make. If I tell someone what the best choice is, well thats my opinion. If he does not make the choice and it turned out the outcome is bad/good, well thats the result of your choice. But that can also be the outcome if he did make that choice afterall...

Calibretto wrote:

Sarevok wrote:

Calibretto wrote:No, they choose not to ascend. You can make choices...and that leads to wherever it ends

And why should one persons choice be favoured over others?

You can do yourself a favour by making choices. But the choice is yours to make. If I tell someone what the best choice is, well thats my opinion. If he does not make the choice and it turned out the outcome is bad/good, well thats the result of your choice. But that can also be the outcome if he did make that choice afterall...

As you more or less said, this game doesn't give you a choice. You "choose" not to ascend, then you choose to be weaker then everyone else, and put yourself at a dis-advantage. I don't see why i choice like that should be so heavily punished. Hence my idea i came up with

I suggest that players/alliances in PERG - CANNOT join a house, they already get enough protection in there, and seeing as admin wont force a max armysize of 30-40mill and allows them to sit in the top 100 and still get GnR etc etc etc list goes on, do not allow them to get more bonuses to hide with,

I also suggest while your updating the game, you make it you can only enter perg 1 time every 3 months, this will stop the ones who come out sell all resources for $$ then go back in to grow without being hit, perg what a joke.

please admin, 1st repair old problems.

Calibretto wrote:please admin, 1st repair old problems.

A-MEN