StarGateWars Forums

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Tekki wrote:

whereub wrote:

Tekki wrote:I’d be more inclined to offer congratulations if you were not on PPT Mathlord but I guess that’s the story of my life.

The infidelity of TAF… sigh. Apart from Norbert's spies and weapons, it's a bit of a pity I can't say thank you to TAF for all the defences to mass.

says the person who massed me and went ppt

If you want to call 300b a defence with no MS. Sure we can call that a defence.... it's about normal for Ricos.

I tried to go killing and hurting last night. I found remarkably little to hurt and kill.

Aww Tekki, that's because I destroyed the only 2 1 trill plus defences in Ricos yesterday..sorry to leave you such slim pickings. Seriosuly boring..there should be a new update that attacks and defences should be equal..cos once u mass everyone, only attacks are built leaving no more mass opportunities. Now if someone had to build a defence equal to the attack he was building.mmmmm

THATS STUPID , NO OFFENSE...

ETL isn't stupid he's just special

why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.

jason just fixed the damn 1 attack mass thing for whoever was complaining about it , what do you want a world where the underdog never has a chance?

WTH is the point of that theres no point in any wars then , what if at the end of a war someone has just enough naq for a good strike to have a great online , who are you to say he has to pull 100T naq out his ass just to build a defence , then on that

he would have to build his defence every single time he got hit just to fight back ,

its a contradictive thing your talking about here....

Actually there are some kind of wars and nations who are based only on strike and have no defensive bases. But those are mostly very unimportant for our life in 21st century (or are important? who knows, terorism is some kind of war w/o defence).

Also Ryus statment about what STUPID is have no sense... someone who starts war and is than defenceless and enemy is laughing on him... Ryu... thats normal not stupid.

Btw, Go go go OE!

Ryuujin Jakka wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.

jason just fixed the damn 1 attack mass thing for whoever was complaining about it , what do you want a world where the underdog never has a chance?

WTH is the point of that theres no point in any wars then , what if at the end of a war someone has just enough naq for a good strike to have a great online , who are you to say he has to pull 100T naq out his ass just to build a defence , then on that

he would have to build his defence every single time he got hit just to fight back ,

its a contradictive thing your talking about here....

Well then underdogs shouldn't challenge the strong. Do you see Luxemburgh challenge the UK? Or do you think Iran, for all it's bravado would dare attack an American base? There are plenty of ways so called underdogs can build up...and then try to mass. The point is not to go piss off people stronger when one is not ready.

seems to be working just fine to me

Why?

Hey C2

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Ryuujin Jakka wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.

jason just fixed the damn 1 attack mass thing for whoever was complaining about it , what do you want a world where the underdog never has a chance?

WTH is the point of that theres no point in any wars then , what if at the end of a war someone has just enough naq for a good strike to have a great online , who are you to say he has to pull 100T naq out his ass just to build a defence , then on that

he would have to build his defence every single time he got hit just to fight back ,

its a contradictive thing your talking about here....

Well then underdogs shouldn't challenge the strong. Do you see Luxemburgh challenge the UK? Or do you think Iran, for all it's bravado would dare attack an American base? There are plenty of ways so called underdogs can build up...and then try to mass. The point is not to go piss off people stronger when one is not ready.

Doesn't have anything to do with this war or whatever else you are talking about but.

Iran's negative influences permeate through Iraq and Afghanistan... including plenty of attacks on U.S. Forces and bases. Maybe they don't attack directly with an Iranian flag flying high from every mortar and IED, but that doesn't mean they dare not attack us.

Killing 3-4 Times my losses so works fine for me

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Ryuujin Jakka wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.

jason just fixed the damn 1 attack mass thing for whoever was complaining about it , what do you want a world where the underdog never has a chance?

WTH is the point of that theres no point in any wars then , what if at the end of a war someone has just enough naq for a good strike to have a great online , who are you to say he has to pull 100T naq out his ass just to build a defence , then on that

he would have to build his defence every single time he got hit just to fight back ,

its a contradictive thing your talking about here....

Well then underdogs shouldn't challenge the strong. Do you see Luxemburgh challenge the UK? Or do you think Iran, for all it's bravado would dare attack an American base? There are plenty of ways so called underdogs can build up...and then try to mass. The point is not to go piss off people stronger when one is not ready.

you just avoided your point contradicting its self....


@ C2 ricos arnt defencless people come on just after there defences get 0'ed and expect them to have built 5t defence miliseconds after it went down , its just stupid.

some people actualy have to farm for naq to rebuy and etl for example has no patience , what can he expect 4- 5 alliances vs 1 ?

.....

instead of moaning at ricos for not building you juicy defs to mass every day moan at your own members who arent building anything but token defs apart from the special ones with there 40 - 90 trill defs. Every war youse always moan but but they wont build big defs every day. STOP MOANING AND KILL WHAT YOU FIND AND IF YOU FIND NOTHING THEN TOUGH