Page 20 of 29

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 7:33 am
by Arkenius
The Tribulation wrote:
Arkenius wrote:
The Tribulation wrote:
Arkenius wrote:
The Tribulation wrote:
PS: Don't forget to rebuild your CS. I think I can mass it better this time. Also I don't mind if you improve it a bit. ~21/20 is not high enough. :smt106
I'll get right on that :smt015
08:30 Tribulation Attack 2,143,846,394,797,348 Dark Matter Units taken 15 89,176 4,852 7,720,189,638,890,000 3

You are actually trying to farm with me online? Really? :smt018

The fun part is when you tried to take it back. Come on! :smt101
Lol your welcome.

I'm glad you spend so much time paying attention to me... its flattering... no really, it is :smt078
but but... we're at war. Who else would I look at? :smt078

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 7:46 am
by Tribulation
Nice try getting my CS again Ark. Since I already removed 1.1B spies (was quite surprised a vet like yourself would have 1.3B trained on a 97T assassin power ](*,) ), figured you didnt want your CS either :)


Figured i would return the favor :) Can't really call it a onliner, even though you were, in fact, online :smt060

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 7:53 am
by Arkenius
The Tribulation wrote:Nice try getting my CS again Ark. Since I already removed 1.1B spies (was quite surprised a vet like yourself would have 1.3B trained on a 97T assassin power ](*,) ), figured you didnt want your CS either :)


Figured i would return the favor :) Can't really call it a onliner, even though you were, in fact, online :smt060
actually I logged off for a bit. what exactly were you expecting me to do? Seems only fair... I kill yours, you kill mine. :D

I was actually surprised as well about that covert. I think I pressed an unecessary zero there. Saw your 4bil assassins... was 1 second too late for one decent hit. ah well. good kill :smt110

Let me just get some ATs. I'll pay you a visit shortly.

PS: uh oh... 1ATs hits... you are learning. I'm almost impressed :smt101

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 7:55 am
by Tribulation
Arkenius wrote:
The Tribulation wrote:Nice try getting my CS again Ark. Since I already removed 1.1B spies (was quite surprised a vet like yourself would have 1.3B trained on a 97T assassin power ](*,) ), figured you didnt want your CS either :)


Figured i would return the favor :) Can't really call it a onliner, even though you were, in fact, online :smt060
actually I logged off for a bit. what exactly were you expecting me to do? Seems only fair... I kill yours, you kill mine. :D
:)

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:04 am
by Wukong
harchester wrote:
Wukong wrote:
naberius wrote:The only one to have a defence was red1 the other 2 both massed on ZERO defences. Tut tut mcdeadly seems your alliance members can't practice what they preach.
Your presuming.... - OE is not an alliance well liked so we fight numerous wars.. not all are attention seeking wars therefore not in the galactic colosseum.

Anyhoo - until admin code in def to use attack ratio, there is no need to flog this he's massing with a 0 def horse. some abide by the unwritten rules of combat and others (from all alliances) don't.
Gotta love irony

It was your empire high council that brought up the 0 defence stuff, so instead of trying to get some digs in. Go speak to your own leaders first before yapping on here.

- I see you built a defence nothing spectacular but I'll look forward to that ppt drop none the less :)
aww someone is angry .. just a game bub.

But give me your id on which account your using this week and I'll drop PPT for ya. but let me guess... you won't

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:35 am
by harchester
Wukong wrote:
harchester wrote:
Wukong wrote:
naberius wrote:The only one to have a defence was red1 the other 2 both massed on ZERO defences. Tut tut mcdeadly seems your alliance members can't practice what they preach.
Your presuming.... - OE is not an alliance well liked so we fight numerous wars.. not all are attention seeking wars therefore not in the galactic colosseum.

Anyhoo - until admin code in def to use attack ratio, there is no need to flog this he's massing with a 0 def horse. some abide by the unwritten rules of combat and others (from all alliances) don't.
Gotta love irony

It was your empire high council that brought up the 0 defence stuff, so instead of trying to get some digs in. Go speak to your own leaders first before yapping on here.

- I see you built a defence nothing spectacular but I'll look forward to that ppt drop none the less :)
aww someone is angry .. just a game bub.

But give me your id on which account your using this week and I'll drop PPT for ya. but let me guess... you won't
I dropped ppt - massed everyone in delta and omega and a few others not on ppt.

I would have massed u - but u were on ppt. there was nothing left to mass so I ppt'd.

And now it's time to enjoy some gloriously cold prosecco and beer(s)

Laters alligator

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:17 pm
by Colonel Jack Oneill
I **Filtered** love presecco

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 2:37 pm
by Führer
Wukong wrote:
harchester wrote:
Wukong wrote:
naberius wrote:The only one to have a defence was red1 the other 2 both massed on ZERO defences. Tut tut mcdeadly seems your alliance members can't practice what they preach.
Your presuming.... - OE is not an alliance well liked so we fight numerous wars.. not all are attention seeking wars therefore not in the galactic colosseum.

Anyhoo - until admin code in def to use attack ratio, there is no need to flog this he's massing with a 0 def horse. some abide by the unwritten rules of combat and others (from all alliances) don't.
Gotta love irony

It was your empire high council that brought up the 0 defence stuff, so instead of trying to get some digs in. Go speak to your own leaders first before yapping on here.

- I see you built a defence nothing spectacular but I'll look forward to that ppt drop none the less :)
aww someone is angry .. just a game bub.

But give me your id on which account your using this week and I'll drop PPT for ya. but let me guess... you won't
I would like to say I'm surprised that some oe players mass on a zero defence, but I'm really not.
Funny thing is your side is always the first to whinge about someone else doing it but when it comes to you doing it, should be swept under the carpet.
Funny that hey

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 2:46 pm
by naberius
The Anti-Christ wrote:
Wukong wrote:
harchester wrote:
Wukong wrote:
naberius wrote:The only one to have a defence was red1 the other 2 both massed on ZERO defences. Tut tut mcdeadly seems your alliance members can't practice what they preach.
Your presuming.... - OE is not an alliance well liked so we fight numerous wars.. not all are attention seeking wars therefore not in the galactic colosseum.

Anyhoo - until admin code in def to use attack ratio, there is no need to flog this he's massing with a 0 def horse. some abide by the unwritten rules of combat and others (from all alliances) don't.
Gotta love irony

It was your empire high council that brought up the 0 defence stuff, so instead of trying to get some digs in. Go speak to your own leaders first before yapping on here.

- I see you built a defence nothing spectacular but I'll look forward to that ppt drop none the less :)
aww someone is angry .. just a game bub.

But give me your id on which account your using this week and I'll drop PPT for ya. but let me guess... you won't
I would like to say I'm surprised that some oe players mass on a zero defence, but I'm really not.
Funny thing is your side is always the first to whinge about someone else doing it but when it comes to you doing it, should be swept under the carpet.
Funny that hey
Well said mate :smt060

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 5:01 pm
by Wukong
naberius wrote:
The Anti-Christ wrote:
Wukong wrote:
harchester wrote:
Wukong wrote:
naberius wrote:The only one to have a defence was red1 the other 2 both massed on ZERO defences. Tut tut mcdeadly seems your alliance members can't practice what they preach.
Your presuming.... - OE is not an alliance well liked so we fight numerous wars.. not all are attention seeking wars therefore not in the galactic colosseum.

Anyhoo - until admin code in def to use attack ratio, there is no need to flog this he's massing with a 0 def horse. some abide by the unwritten rules of combat and others (from all alliances) don't.
Gotta love irony

It was your empire high council that brought up the 0 defence stuff, so instead of trying to get some digs in. Go speak to your own leaders first before yapping on here.

- I see you built a defence nothing spectacular but I'll look forward to that ppt drop none the less :)
aww someone is angry .. just a game bub.

But give me your id on which account your using this week and I'll drop PPT for ya. but let me guess... you won't
I would like to say I'm surprised that some oe players mass on a zero defence, but I'm really not.
Funny thing is your side is always the first to whinge about someone else doing it but when it comes to you doing it, should be swept under the carpet.
Funny that hey
Well said mate :smt060
First thing is - guys stop getting upset.. it's a text based sort of game thingy!

Image

Second: I'm not sure how you guys read my comments, because it looks like your all worked up into a lather of misquotation.

All I'm saying is - when he logged in, the guys that massed him had 0 def - were they massed before he logged in and is he presuming they did mass with a 0 def? or is he using the jeditank mind trick of propaganda wins the war? .. McD was online when your boys were massing with 0 def.... hence his comments.

So well said?.... I think not.

The Third thing I said was - Only admin can stop 0 def massing by coding in a def to attack ratio before any attacks could be made. example: your def should be 30% of your attack before your strike works - now I'm no coder so I don't know if that can happen... I'm just a guy that has come off vac to kill off resources before heading back on vac until I time to play again.

Anyhow .. read this; then misquote it .. propaganda the snot out of it ... who really cares.................... Harchester and your irony quote ... naughty

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:17 pm
by Führer
Wukong wrote:
First thing is - guys stop getting upset.. it's a text based sort of game thingy!

Image

Second: I'm not sure how you guys read my comments, because it looks like your all worked up into a lather of misquotation.

All I'm saying is - when he logged in, the guys that massed him had 0 def - were they massed before he logged in and is he presuming they did mass with a 0 def? or is he using the jeditank mind trick of propaganda wins the war? .. McD was online when your boys were massing with 0 def.... hence his comments.

So well said?.... I think not.

The Third thing I said was - Only admin can stop 0 def massing by coding in a def to attack ratio before any attacks could be made. example: your def should be 30% of your attack before your strike works - now I'm no coder so I don't know if that can happen... I'm just a guy that has come off vac to kill off resources before heading back on vac until I time to play again.

Anyhow .. read this; then misquote it .. propaganda the snot out of it ... who really cares.................... Harchester and your irony quote ... naughty
Ahh the kind of intelligence I would expect from someone from OE whom obviously misses the point I was trying to make.
Please don't take me posting in this thread as a "I give a flying **Filtered** about your petty excuses as to why or why not you were massing on a zero defense", because I really don't care as I am not in this war but I find it very amusing to which the level of double standards OE holds.
Also, I don't think the people above (mainly referring to myself) are referring to one particular instance, the OE players who have been doing this (you know who you are) have been doing it for quite some time so it comes as no surprise really.

Some might even use the words "hypocritical douche bags" but we won't go there.
Personally I'm not mad if someone from OE wants to mass with a zero defense, after all it's their prerogative.
I think it is more disappointment that it's obvious it happens from certain members within OE but yet you still firmly claim that it doesn't or try to offer up some pitiful excuse as to why it does/did happen.

Now who is taking the game too seriously, if you do it who cares.
Just own up to it like a man rather then parading around squealing like a little girl, denying the fact that everyone else in the community can see through your **Filtered**.

Does my lack of emotions in this post make you think I'm mad, if so I please ask that you do not breed.

Have a nice day sir wukong.

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:01 pm
by overlord elz
Yummy yummy, bread and honey!
22:57 Snakekeeper 1,200,278,875,650 Naquadah stolen 15 677

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:21 pm
by Arkenius
The Anti Christ's opinions should probably be counted as void. Since he can't even make up his mind about his own position regarding the poor judgement folk.

Hate them, Love them, Fight them, defend them. Make up your mind and only then we will take you seriously. Until further notice you are just another credit card clown posting in the wrong forum topic, about random things you cannot comprehend. :-D

I guess there's always the small minded folk that hate on others. That's why everyone hates OE so much. We, the members of OE call this entertainment. We appreciate the "hard work" of our fans, so please don't let us down. Much luv! :smt064

Good day, sir Spend'A'Lot. :smt117

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:25 pm
by Belsamber
Wukong wrote: McD was online when your boys were massing with 0 def.... hence his comments.

So well said?.... I think not.
I was also online while God of war was massing with a 0 defence.

That is all :smt060

Welcome back :smt050

Let's put all these random things to bed and just mass one another and share the love that way?

Re: Judgement v OE

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:04 pm
by overlord elz
Arkansas 0'd