Page 3 of 6
Re: I am not.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:15 pm
by Castiel
An alliance decides to believe the enemy but not an devoted member.
LAL
Re: I am not.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:04 pm
by Ra
_Ancient God Anubis_ wrote:Its alright Luc, same thing happend to me, But Pungemo was making up crab saying I attacked him during cease fire when I was in OSL, Just like they are making up stories you gave them info.
N00Bs are N00Bs...
PS: Ra, post and flame me.
If you really want me too...Anyway, AGA breaks a ceasefire and then pouts after he is kicked. No surprise, and yes you're a noob. Good job, would you like a gold star?
Anyways, I really hope SC cowboys up and tells the truth. The soiling of a persons name by nefarious means is just wrong. Good luck to both parties, in sifting through the crap and finding the truth.
Re: I am not.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:04 pm
by *zesh*
mystake the sgw drama queen
why did this need to go in front of everyone
shows your dedication to your alliance now eh>
always struck me as odd, when people started getting annoyed at you, you went to osl.
when osl went to tj you went, when they got threatened you went right back to osl. Now that your removed, its zomg 4 days ppt, and whine, must get back in quick!
Re: I am not.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:10 pm
by Hansbrough
*zesh* wrote:mystake the sgw drama queen
why did this need to go in front of everyone
shows your dedication to your alliance now eh>
always struck me as odd, when people started getting annoyed at you, you went to osl.
when osl went to tj you went, when they got threatened you went right back to osl. Now that your removed, its zomg 4 days ppt, and whine, must get back in quick!
that's not entirely true... mytake was never allowed in tj, hence why he went back to osl b/c mia was rebuilding it and it was the closest thing to an ingame family he still had.
Re: I am not.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:49 pm
by Shornaal
Im giving Mystake 7 days grace period.
During these 7 days he will have to compile as must information to prove his innocence.
So far the proof we have isnt in his favor.
So its up to him to prove us otherwise.
Ive had a few things come to light in his favor 2nite.
If anyone wants to speak to me in his favour add me to msn for a chat.
mailto:?subject=&body=
Re: I am not.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:37 pm
by Zodiac
I've known Mystake for awhile now, since I used to be OSL as well. I have also chatted with him on MSN before and played/chatted with him over Xbox live. He doesn't strike me as someone who would betray his alliance. I really hope OSL looks into this because I believe Mystake is telling the truth.
Also, I don't see how him accusing SC of being multi's is bad behavior. I mean come on, most of them claim to be brothers, best friends, and schoolmates to each other. I bet at least some of them are multi's.
Re: I am not.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:28 am
by Teal'auc of the Void
It's indeed ridiculous that alliance Mystake served so long decided to trust the enemy than their own member. Shame on you. And the fact he needs to prove himself innocent - hillarious. Most people must be proven guilty first but it seems you guys are fast judges, eh?
By denying Mystale in such way you are losing reliable and trustworthy alliance member. Your loss.
Teal'auc
Re: I am not.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:11 am
by Castiel
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:It's indeed ridiculous that alliance Mystake served so long decided to trust the enemy than their own member. Shame on you. And the fact he needs to prove himself innocent - hillarious. Most people must be proven guilty first but it seems you guys are fast judges, eh?
By denying Mystale in such way you are losing reliable and trustworthy alliance member. Your loss.
Teal'auc
Yeah its c to the rap that he has to prove himself innocent.
Shoornal may i ask you to pm me with that prove you have against him? :$
Re: I am not.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:38 am
by Giovanni
Ahahahahaha.
*TRAITOR* *TRAITOOOORRRRR*
Re: I am not.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:55 am
by Castiel
Giovanni wrote:Ahahahahaha.
*TRAITOR* *TRAITOOOORRRRR*
shut the stuff up
<modded>.
Please no namecalling.
Teal'auc
Re: I am not.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:30 am
by Teal'auc of the Void
Giovanni wrote:Ahahahahaha.
*TRAITOR* *TRAITOOOORRRRR*
Gotta love pointless posts like that... obviously some people tend to enjoy unjustice made on others. Because I *do* know Luc never betrayaled anyone. Yes, he can be annoying for some people, however he can as well be trusted and devoted... which he always has been... both to me as an officer and as member of OSL.
Teal'auc
Re: I am not.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:51 am
by Mystake
Giovanni wrote:Ahahahahaha.
*TRAITOR* *TRAITOOOORRRRR*
Meth, I appreciate, but no need.
Giovanni, laugh while you still can.
Re: I am not.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:55 am
by Dark Bahamut
luc maybe past experiences we had can help this situation?
if i can gimme a shout
Re: I am not.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:16 am
by lillmia
I WILL DO THIS VERY SHORT...
Luc isn´t an traitor, it was a setup.
Hopefully he will get his reputation back and his name clared by this post
Regards Lillmia
Re: I am not.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:18 am
by Mystake
lillmia wrote:Luc isn´t an traitor, it was a setup.
*cough*upyoursneim*cough*