Page 3 of 4

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:11 am
by *zesh*
oh TL and TG mass vultures i believe

but offically as a TDL member i can say we do not recognise vultures

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:14 am
by Easy^
i'd say that if a person has more than 20b naq out and hes at war, HE IS NOT REALLY at war, or the opponents are a goddamn joke :)

As for the hit me i hit you... If i get hit by some1 whos at war, to me he admits its fair game if i hit him :)

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:36 am
by thicks
Alpha also does not recognize vultures - except as potential targets to be added to a list to be dealt with when we feel like it.

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:38 am
by buck
If you attack me war or not you become a target and i kill j00.

However, i dont really care for the term vultering..if you can, then take it, at your own risk, just like any other hit.

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:17 pm
by 12agnar0k
Vulturing is just a made up term in sgw, basically an excuse to mass you.
People get bored in wars so they just mass anyone who hits them, quite right too.
Some players/ some alliances will mass you regardless of War, occassionally sticking in the Vulture excuse because you might fool for it and say sorry to them , rofl. :lol: :-D
Altho its annoying if your in war and get hit by someone when your trying to war with someone, simple answer build a defence and risk loosing stats. Or risk getting farmed by the very very bad totally Evil "Vultures."

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:08 am
by TheRook
I hate the term vulturing...


When I'm in a war and have 0 defence I'd rather some random noob got my naq than the enemy...

if I'm at war and I have defence enough to protect my naq... and someone with a big strike from an alliance not in the war comes in and hits me I'll message them to let them know about the war...


If you dont want to get hit for naq... build some defence... simple as... if your defence keeps getting destroyed... that will teach you for being in a war and getting your ass handed to you... :)

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:38 am
by Wolf359
Another vulturing poll!!???

Anyway - NO. Sometimes people only have the chance to fight back if they are in a war - and as already mentioned why do some alliances/people label others who attack them during war as 'vultures' when they still attack others outside of the war themselves?

Happened to me a while back - someone in a war attacked me - I attacked them back and got called a 'vulture'!

Double standards?

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:59 am
by RepliJake
What is people's problem with double standards?

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:01 am
by Wolf359
General Pain I wrote:What is people's problem with double standards?


Are you stalking me around the forum? Kinda creeping me out - lol! :-D

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:03 am
by RepliJake
No, I just post in the interesting threads, as do you, btw check out the vendetta section :P

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:10 am
by noone
buck wrote:However, i dont really care for the term vultering..if you can, then take it, at your own risk, just like any other hit.


Yes, now thats excactly what it should be.

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:17 am
by REK
General Pain I wrote:No, I just post in the interesting threads, as do you, btw check out the vendetta section :P



why are u checking out vendettas section :shock:

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:15 am
by borg
If I leave too much naq out wehn Im ina war its fair game to whoever - but if someone masses me then they are in my book vultures - if they wanna mass me then do it to my face not like a thief in the night

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:23 am
by Noobert
borg wrote:If I leave too much naq out wehn Im ina war its fair game to whoever - but if someone masses me then they are in my book vultures - if they wanna mass me then do it to my face not like a thief in the night


Way to bump a old thread..rofl..

Re: Vulturing ?

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:49 am
by Maha Vishnu
As mentioned earlier, if I have 10bil out on a 0 defence and I am at war then the opponents must be pretty poor unless they have a massive strike.

However, it is the 3bil naq hits by others not in the war that annoys me.

I personally beleive if you are war and you have more naq (10bil def = 1 bil naq) then you are fair target, even when NOT IN WAR.

Of course there are no rules, however as humans we like to set rules as it gives us guidlines so some alliances mass players for continued naq hits irrelevent if 40bil on a 0 def.

I put it down to, players being macho. Your a big allaince and some toe rag hits one of your players it makes you look weak :( , but that is less naq for you opponent to buy atts and mass your buddies.

Also, players that hit you and are at war, it is not fair, if you hit them and there alliance mass you back, but that is the game.

Personally, I try not to farm players at war, but in the current climate then this looks like going out the window. Everyone is game :)