Page 3 of 5
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 9:49 am
by Mordack
Super Soldier Lost 32,925,390
Super Guards Lost 7,939,097
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 10:10 am
by zeekomkommer
Super Soldier Lost 4,022,724
Attack Super Soldiers Killed 6,703,595
Super Guards Lost 9,161,909
Defence Super Soldiers Killed 13,964,454
what can i say, i'm more of a raider then a farmer

Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 10:19 am
by Am Heh
Super Soldier Lost 1,195,358
Attack Super Soldiers Killed 2,155,718
Super Guards Lost 2,971,007
Defense Super Soldiers Killed 10,692,974
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 10:35 am
by bebita
manny crap stats
TO had braves soldier lost in their fights
Super Soldier Lost 66,483,787
Super Guards Lost 19,301,816
they fought well

Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 10:55 am
by Angel_F1re
Super Defenders Lost 4,192,344
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 10:59 am
by ~Thamuz~
Super Soldier Lost 39,633,872
Attack Super Soldiers Killed 18,520,252
Super Guards Lost 7,509,151
Defense Super Soldiers Killed 142,258,038
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:07 am
by Biscuit
Super Questers Lost 7,298,462
Super Defenders Lost 11,261,183
Defence Super Soldiers Killed 9,229,593
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:56 am
by cyberblade
iNFiNiTY wrote:cyberblade wrote:blahh wrote:I dont think i wanna post mine

hehe. your ratios not be as good...
Aint sure about that
well, im pretty sure that farming is going to give him much higher loss ratios than raiding and massing, as he's using 15 turn hits on people with def (I've even seen logs where he's lost a mil units in a hit. yes, half of those were probably mercs). so yeah, i presume that his losses are fairly high. thats just because of the way he plays, his losses are high, he gets a lot of naq to somewhat offset those losses. maybe im wrong, but thats how i see the math. maybe blahh can post and enlighten us

Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 12:36 pm
by Why So Serious?
Super Defenders Lost 14,004,822
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 1:26 pm
by Defense-Forcefield
Attack Super Soldiers Killed 3,131,227
Defence Super Soldiers Killed 22,093,067
Super Questers Lost 15,323,841
Super Defenders Lost 3,287,576
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 2:10 pm
by Snow Wulf
Super Soldier Lost 9,850,452
Super Guards Lost 9,891,306
eint that nice, i don't make differences. They both die the same

Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:28 pm
by vinny d
cyberblade wrote:iNFiNiTY wrote:cyberblade wrote:blahh wrote:I dont think i wanna post mine

hehe. your ratios not be as good...
Aint sure about that
well, im pretty sure that farming is going to give him much higher loss ratios than raiding and massing, as he's using 15 turn hits on people with def (I've even seen logs where he's lost a mil units in a hit. yes, half of those were probably mercs). so yeah, i presume that his losses are fairly high. thats just because of the way he plays, his losses are high, he gets a lot of naq to somewhat offset those losses. maybe im wrong, but thats how i see the math. maybe blahh can post and enlighten us

Not really. He has mercs, planets and a beast of an ms. What does that do? IT gives him an awesome ratio.
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:34 pm
by Juliette
True.. when Blahh hits me, he loses 25k units.
When he hits me, I lose over 200k. It's insane.. but if all those calculations are right, he earned it. Alas.
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:16 pm
by Tigatron
dazman wrote:Super Questers Lost 28,549,627
Defence Super Soldiers Killed 231,310,094
HOW DO YOU GETS RATIOS LIKE THAT
*grubles* stupid epic people *grumbly stops*
Re: Deaths of many supers
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:25 pm
by dazman
~~X~~ wrote:dazman wrote:Super Questers Lost 28,549,627
Defence Super Soldiers Killed 231,310,094
HOW DO YOU GETS RATIOS LIKE THAT
*grubles* stupid epic people *grumbly stops*
I'm a beast.
