StarGateWars Forums

Ifrit wrote:

Vendetta wrote:

Ifrit wrote:can someone on planet earth explain how when a new alliance is formed in OE, TLE doesnt seem to believe they need to honor their NAP with OE? Just confused and a bit curious.

Cause TLE be Epic.

great that should show good reputation for them in future NAPs...

Not hard to have a good reputation for things given todays standards really though is it now?

Standards?

Almost38 wrote:

Vendetta wrote:

Ifrit wrote:can someone on planet earth explain how when a new alliance is formed in OE, TLE doesnt seem to believe they need to honor their NAP with OE? Just confused and a bit curious.

Cause TLE be Epic.

epic fail

What are you an idiot? How is that a fail?

I'll tell you whats an epic fail. Someone with 2mill army with an alliance tag titled "for the lulz" used to try and cover up his inability to play the game and grow his account and palm of any suspicions of such as claiming you actually don't care and "aren't trying".

Especially when this same person sucks up to various people and alliances based on social and and game standings, yes I noticed while omega was mostly inactive and TLE ruled the top ranks you seemed to be more inclined to suck up to TLE, yet once FUALL move up in the ranks you yet again go back to kissing thier rear end instead.

And while doing this, and claiming my post to be fail, you have a sentence very much the same as what my post stated in your own signature. not to mention you claim peace through power and yet by the looks of you you seem to hold no power over anything anywhere.

Now shush.

Thriller wrote:Standards?

Standards: A rule or principle that is used as a basis for judgment.

Ifrit wrote:

Vendetta wrote:

Ifrit wrote:can someone on planet earth explain how when a new alliance is formed in OE, TLE doesnt seem to believe they need to honor their NAP with OE? Just confused and a bit curious.

Cause TLE be Epic.

great that should show good reputation for them in future NAPs...

It was in tiny writing on the NAP proposal: That TLE could change the terms and conditions of the NAP on a whim to their advantage with it only applying one way - all of course, without consolting the other party and doing so via making some very public statements and threads on main forums on more then one occasion.

Oh wait..

That wasn't Us :/

I'll fallback and use the reason, "cause TLE be Epic".

Wheels turning within wheels and for the most part, cogs tend to know only what they have to know and not the bigger picture or context of their motion. So Ifirit, you'll need to talk to your (wo)men behind the wheel(s) as the rest will tend to spin around in circles giving the accepted although usually woefully inaccurate answer and refusing to budge on the matter (Being incapable of independant movement, and only spinning in a predetermined position) or listen to anything or anyone else.

That is if you want to be an inquisitive cog and not a content cog. For it doesn't take much to be ousted from the machine and then you are down to your own momentum which runs out very quickly before collapsing.

Vendetta wrote:

Thriller wrote:Standards?

Standards: A rule or principle that is used as a basis for judgment.

Oh thanx i was confused.

lol thanks for keeping my joke going

Severian wrote:

Ifrit wrote:

Vendetta wrote:

Ifrit wrote:can someone on planet earth explain how when a new alliance is formed in OE, TLE doesnt seem to believe they need to honor their NAP with OE? Just confused and a bit curious.

Cause TLE be Epic.

great that should show good reputation for them in future NAPs...

It was in tiny writing on the NAP proposal: That TLE could change the terms and conditions of the NAP on a whim to their advantage with it only applying one way - all of course, without consolting the other party and doing so via making some very public statements and threads on main forums on more then one occasion.

Oh wait..

That wasn't Us :/

I'll fallback and use the reason, "cause TLE be Epic".

Wheels turning within wheels and for the most part, cogs tend to know only what they have to know and not the bigger picture or context of their motion. So Ifirit, you'll need to talk to your (wo)men behind the wheel(s) as the rest will tend to spin around in circles giving the accepted although usually woefully inaccurate answer and refusing to budge on the matter (Being incapable of independant movement, and only spinning in a predetermined position) or listen to anything or anyone else.

That is if you want to be an inquisitive cog and not a content cog. For it doesn't take much to be ousted from the machine and then you are down to your own momentum which runs out very quickly before collapsing.

look im just curious, no reason to get all defensive. I just see a certain perspective and thank you for anwsering my question

Vendetta wrote:Cause TLE be Epic.

Vez's Posts be Epic

Ifrit wrote:can someone on planet earth explain how when a new alliance is formed in OE, TLE doesnt seem to believe they need to honor their NAP with OE? Just confused and a bit curious.

is it actually everyone in TLE?? or just 1 or 2

Vendetta wrote:

Almost38 wrote:

Vendetta wrote:

Ifrit wrote:can someone on planet earth explain how when a new alliance is formed in OE, TLE doesnt seem to believe they need to honor their NAP with OE? Just confused and a bit curious.

Cause TLE be Epic.

epic fail

What are you an idiot? How is that a fail?

I'll tell you whats an epic fail. Someone with 2mill army with an alliance tag titled "for the lulz" used to try and cover up his inability to play the game and grow his account and palm of any suspicions of such as claiming you actually don't care and "aren't trying".

Especially when this same person sucks up to various people and alliances based on social and and game standings, yes I noticed while omega was mostly inactive and TLE ruled the top ranks you seemed to be more inclined to suck up to TLE, yet once FUALL move up in the ranks you yet again go back to kissing thier rear end instead.

And while doing this, and claiming my post to be fail, you have a sentence very much the same as what my post stated in your own signature. not to mention you claim peace through power and yet by the looks of you you seem to hold no power over anything anywhere.

Now shush.

Quoted for agreement. Almost you seem to go with the flow your lips touch the behinds of the current top alliances.

Ifrit wrote:can someone on planet earth explain how when a new alliance is formed in OE, TLE doesnt seem to believe they need to honor their NAP with OE? Just confused and a bit curious.

a new alliance wasnt formed, it was absorbed into the empire. slight difference
besides, there are too many naps in this game now. more farms the better

Chris M wrote:...
besides, there are too many naps in this game now. more farms the better

Yes, i heard that to/coto are good farms too. What waste have nap with them. ( Even if they do not care about naps and farm us )

Chris M wrote:

Ifrit wrote:can someone on planet earth explain how when a new alliance is formed in OE, TLE doesnt seem to believe they need to honor their NAP with OE? Just confused and a bit curious.

a new alliance wasnt formed, it was absorbed into the empire. slight difference
besides, there are too many naps in this game now. more farms the better

So you like farming but are inactive during wars?

Perhaps you should go play Stargate farms?

I wonder if Chris M will fight in this war. May have another vacation or something

madcat wrote:

Ifrit wrote:can someone on planet earth explain how when a new alliance is formed in OE, TLE doesnt seem to believe they need to honor their NAP with OE? Just confused and a bit curious.

is it actually everyone in TLE?? or just 1 or 2

doesnt matter, even if its 1 TLE farming or all TLE farming. Any member in an alliance, represents his entire alliance on any and all actions.