Page 3 of 11
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:13 pm
by Mystake
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Mr Mystake wrote:also, quite frankly I find Jack's lack of tact to be quite refreshing. It gets VERY boring of mods trying to go "im sorry i has to do this please dun hurt me main account" and trying to be all phony and nice. atleast we got one moderator who is an actual human being and doesn't have robotic emotions.
LOL, wasn't i fired for that...? Well at least according to you, I was. Make up your mind!
Teal'auc
I'm pretty sure I said you took things too personally.
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:16 pm
by Mystake
In other words, Jack should warn AGA and give him his (I think 8th) warning for calling Jack a **Filtered** mod, or section whatever for Abusing aother user?
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:22 pm
by Teal'auc of the Void
Quite frankly, if AGA was supposed to receive a warning which would have him banned, it would be FAIR instead of Jack abusing another user through his mod powers and then making excuses how he 'saved' him.
Teal'auc
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm
by Lord Akaroth
JACK UNEDIT WHAT YOU SAID PUT IT BACK TO WHAT AGA ACTUALLY SAID ABOUT RACISM!!! and PERMA BAN the IDIOT...problem solved
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:24 pm
by Severian
Jack wrote:Severian is **Filtered** cause I said his posts are too long and made his bumbuddy look like an idiot.
Jack wrote:3. I wasn't aiming to "attack" your sexuality, though I see now that it come out a bit more harsh then I had originally intended and for that I apologize. But I stand by that it's not breaking any rules.
c. Abuse / Racism
Members of the SGW community are required to speak courteously to others.
Personal attacks on members are not tolerated. This includes comments about one’s sex, gender, skin colour, religion or cultural heritage.
Perhaps you should read up on the rules you are meant to moderate. Yet another example on how a lack of experience both on the field and in theory has comprimised the supermod position. Your apology is not a get out of jail free card for that comment, nor do I doubt is has any true meaning behind it other than as an attempt to get out of trouble.
You stand by abusing people and breaking the key points and rules to being a moderator and that is what people are no longer content putting up with. The community deserves better.
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:30 pm
by Teal'auc of the Void
Jack wrote:But then that would be me "targeting AGA" which WOULD be wrong. It would also be WRONG for me to dish out insults and not expect them to come flying back.
It would not be 'targetting' AGA. If he broke rules, you should've warn him. NOT insult him in his own post! You have no tact, no respect and therefore you are not suited to be a moderator. You should lead by example, not act like spoiled brat who got 'papa' at high places so you live in dream you can do what you want and bend rules to what suits you.
Teal'auc
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:00 pm
by killtacular
big deal
point fingers at your self
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:00 pm
by Riposte
Oh my god.
Aga IS an idiot. Jack should've just banned him for making the comment. If Jack edited a perfectly normal comment then it would've been wrong, but if Aga can dish out an insult he can take being called out on it.
I assume most people here would call a racial slur an idiotic thing to say yes? Hence, jack modded him for being an idiot, which is what his edit says
How many warnings do people get?? Start banning people after their 2nd wrong doing and the forums will soon clean up.
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:01 pm
by Sephiroth
Jack stays
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:04 pm
by Teal'auc of the Void
Riposte wrote:Oh my god.
Aga IS an idiot. Jack should've just banned him for making the comment. If Jack edited a perfectly normal comment then it would've been wrong, but if Aga can dish out an insult he can take being called out on it.
I assume most people here would call a racial slur an idiotic thing to say yes? Hence, jack modded him for being an idiot, which is what his edit says
How many warnings do people get?? Start banning people after their 2nd wrong doing and the forums will soon clean up.
The thing is... I don't like AGA either. He's abusive user and all that. He deserved to be warned and if he had enough warnings, he should be banned. The same goes for ANYONE ELSE if they break forum rules, I never cared if they were friends or foes, rules are here for everyone, not just someone.
But should a MODERATOR insult users? If user breaks rule, they should get warned/banned... insulting them is not the way to solve the problem. And making excuses that said mod was amused by it and even admited he was rude... come on, is this where we want these forums to go?
Teal'auc
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:08 pm
by Lord Akaroth
Sorry im backing Jack on this one what he did was acceptable
Jack Stays
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:10 pm
by Teal'auc of the Void
Lord Akaroth wrote:Sorry im backing Jack on this one what he did was acceptable
Jack Stays
Just because you hate AGA, it was acceptable to humilitate him? It was acceptable for a moderator to insult AGA, instead of doing mod duty properly, warning him and/or banning him if neccessary? Sorry to hear, but at least you are not pretending to be good moderator, unlike Jack is.
Teal'auc
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:17 pm
by Teal'auc of the Void
Jack wrote:Depends on your definition of good.
Being abusive towards forum users usually does not classify as good.
But for someone who tends to bend rules to as it suits him, that's probably too hard concept to understand.
Teal'auc
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:19 pm
by Lord Akaroth
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Lord Akaroth wrote:Sorry im backing Jack on this one what he did was acceptable
Jack Stays
Just because you hate AGA, it was acceptable to humilitate him? It was acceptable for a moderator to insult AGA, instead of doing mod duty properly, warning him and/or banning him if neccessary? Sorry to hear, but at least you are not pretending to be good moderator, unlike Jack is.
Teal'auc
Why? Because AGA made a racial comment and Jack called him an idiot..big wooop and as jack has stated its ok to call someone an idiot
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Jack wrote:Depends on your definition of good.
Being abusive towards forum users usually does not classify as good.
But for someone who tends to bend rules to as it suits him, that's probably too hard concept to understand.
Teal'auc
Whos insulting who now?
Re: ~~~~JACKS POST~~~~~~
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:22 pm
by DaDigi
This post is specifically about a mod in question, and not about ingame activities. Thus, this is being moved.
(I just hope I'm not breaking any rules by doing so!)