Page 3 of 5
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:24 am
by Bahamut
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Bahamut wrote:lynch them
commander ID
id=82082
officer ID
id=1908612
Yeah, i have the ID's saved, will look at them when I have more time... atm I am packing myself, as I leave to slovenia tonight... 
But why to stay just by two bullies, when we can masss whole bully alliance...
Teal'auc
let me know when u are back so we can have some fun like in old days
lynch them
commander ID
id=82082
officer ID
id=1908612
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:52 am
by buck
In the world of sgws you should all know that we enjoy pasteing people, and people causeing chaos, and thats the way it should be.
However they should also know that if they do anything to our friends, we kill them.
Noone touch the CO. Mien.
George, I shant be hitting ppt for the next 3 years, so ner ner :p
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:01 am
by [KMA]Avenger
lol@ buck
Pele wrote:Gotta agree with Brdavs, its a bit heavy handed considering the guys never knew why Avenger wasn't online.
Oh and get well soon Avenger *sends more healing energy*!
sorry pele, i didnt see your post before now...
thanks
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:11 am
by ~Predators~
[KMA]Avenger wrote:well everything was cool till sunday night when the pain started and the net was the last thing on my mind which is why i said i wasnt angry, mate please dont do anything, whats done is done.
Mate the point is tht u had a defence and u didnt hav alot of UUs out!! He hit u for very less and i wud take tht offensive as u were my officer at tht moment...
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:15 am
by [KMA]Avenger
i was attacked yesterday and probably had roughly 1.5 mill UU out since i didnt login since sunday evening and my UP is over 450k as you know

Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:26 am
by Bahamut
predators wrote:[KMA]Avenger wrote:well everything was cool till sunday night when the pain started and the net was the last thing on my mind which is why i said i wasnt angry, mate please dont do anything, whats done is done.
Mate the point is tht u had a defence and u didnt hav alot of UUs out!! He hit u for very less and i wud take tht offensive as u were my officer at tht moment...
agreed
he has almost 200 mil soldiers
plus G has CO who is probably active
and actions taken against G are the kind that usually starts war
it is obvious he is not inactive player and such unprovoked actions demand retaliation
for TLE memebers
what would u say if someone did that to one of your members without any cause
it is ok to take naq if u can but to mass entire account for 1 mil uu and 2 trillion of naga
they should be lynched!
KILL THEM, HANG THEM, BURN THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!111
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:43 am
by Pele
Bahamut if this happened to a member of TLE under normal circumstances tehn it is the members fault and their choice as to whether to do something, under Avengers circumstances the alliance may step in and help if so wished by the member but from what I understand Avenger wants no retaliation as he feels it is a valid hit. I think you should respect Avengers wishes.
Edit: Also I am sure if you talk to the guy and tell him Avengers circumstances he will happily pay for the damage he caused.
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:50 am
by buck
Pele wrote:Bahamut if this happened to a member of TLE under normal circumstances tehn it is the members fault and their choice as to whether to do something, under Avengers circumstances the alliance may step in and help if so wished by the member but from what I understand Avenger wants no retaliation as he feels it is a valid hit. I think you should respect Avengers wishes.
Edit: Also I am sure if you talk to the guy and tell him Avengers circumstances he will happily pay for the damage he caused.
Did he pm Avenger first, to see if the circumstances permitted?
Nah.
Now we feel it is rude to go knocking down doors, without even knocking first =P
You must smash these peoples heads in first, then talk to them afterwards, its what the A-Team would do.
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:57 am
by Bahamut
Pele wrote:Bahamut if this happened to a member of TLE under normal circumstances tehn it is the members fault and their choice as to whether to do something, under Avengers circumstances the alliance may step in and help if so wished by the member but from what I understand Avenger wants no retaliation as he feels it is a valid hit. I think you should respect Avengers wishes.
Edit: Also I am sure if you talk to the guy and tell him Avengers circumstances he will happily pay for the damage he caused.
lol i think u are full of bull if that happend to tle member entire tle would go gun blazing on poor guy
that still does not justify his act
IT IS ACT OF WAR!
ask anyone here on this forums
especially now that we where filled with some more info about event
conerning what avenger wants
u sure can't speak in his name, and i sure know he is pi$$ed and would like to mass that guy to oblivion if he was not under protection of tle
i think i know G much better then u so i will take right to know what he thinks
to resume
your guy made act of war
he will suffer consequencess i am sure in that 100%
now because this story has a much bigger bg it will not be avenger alliance against your guy but every player that has ever stood to some rules of engagement so it will not be alliance vs alliance but good vs bad light vs dark
bad and dark is your guy in this story
ENDE FINITO KRAJ !!!!
your guy made mistake and i am sure he will pay for it
edit: it is not mine to talk to your guy why dont u talk to him and tell him he owes 12 mil uu 3 mil mercenaries and 3 trills of naga?
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:06 am
by DarkChaos
I am truly sorry for this, if we had known that he was in the hospital we whouldn`t have massed the def to get the uu.
But in our defence we thought that he was inactive:
Attack Turns: 4000 , and a lot of uu out and everytime we spyed the def got lower and lower so we decided to take the uu before someone else did
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:11 am
by Pele
Bahamut as far as I am aware he is not under protection from TLE. Also I do not know what Avenger wants, I can only guess from what he posts. I can't speak for all of TLE but in TDL if somebody leaves a rediculous amount of naq out on a small defence then the alliance will not defend them in a 1 v 1, if you start the trouble you finish it so no we would not all go crazy.
The only reason I defend him is I am thinking from his point of view, unkowningly doing something wrong, he may like to have the opportunity to rectify the situation rather than have half of the SGW server hating him for somebody he shouldn't have.
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:12 am
by Dean_S
looool, right according to you its act of war?? so why doesnt ur alliance act to this so called 'act of war' and mass them, instead of complaining on forum moaning....
You have been hit, big wooow part of the game mate, you might of bin ill with ur car accident, we all have them...
maybe you should look at whats happening your whinning on forum for help... maybe not asking but ur hinting to people...
maybe save your naq and uu... pm the player and ask for a percent back and set a nap for furture accidents or maybe if he sees u with alot out he hits u and takes a percent... just a idea

Dean_S
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:19 am
by Bahamut
DarkChaos wrote:I am truly sorry for this, if we had known that he was in the hospital we whouldn`t have massed the def to get the uu.
But in our defence we thought that he was inactive:
Attack Turns: 4000 , and a lot of uu out and everytime we spyed the def got lower and lower so we decided to take the uu before someone else did
lmao u thought he is inactive because he had 4k turns lmao this is most stupid excuse i ever heard, waht would u say if he had 6k turns lol
and dean he is not in ak anymore so i can't speak for my alliance and since i am not in ak currently i also can't speak for my alliance
but i can call for public lynch no matter in which alliance are u in
and as i know a lot of them will answer the call
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:23 am
by Pele
Bahamut wrote:DarkChaos wrote:I am truly sorry for this, if we had known that he was in the hospital we whouldn`t have massed the def to get the uu.
But in our defence we thought that he was inactive:
Attack Turns: 4000 , and a lot of uu out and everytime we spyed the def got lower and lower so we decided to take the uu before someone else did
lmao u thought he is inactive because he had 4k turns lmao this is most stupid excuse i ever heard, waht would u say if he had 6k turns lol
and dean he is not in ak anymore so i can't speak for my alliance and since i am not in ak currently i also can't speak for my alliance
but i can call for public lynch no matter in which alliance are u in
and as i know a lot of them will answer the call
4k AT is the max you can have from turn generation so tjhe majority of inactive accounts have 4k AT out.
Re: not angry and not upset...
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:39 am
by Brdavs
How TLE would react Bahamut? For starters TLE would fight itsown battles if it came to that, not hit up the entire server to "lynch" the guys and their alliance cos they did something dozens do every day... You dare ask for a show of hands who wouldn`t tapp an account with that much out heh? Who would "PM first" lol?
90% of those that have the marbles to hit some1 in anger and dont just live off their income would prolly be all over it.
Funny thing here is that the resident bullies of SGW are saying it`s going over the top a bit lol. Where is this world coming to I ask you?
