Page 3 of 4

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:11 am
by Apadamek
bwahahahaha. Jack, this is awesome. Well done man, well done.

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:59 am
by RBR
Semper wrote:
buck wrote:
RBR wrote:
Robot Nixon wrote:The rest of the world to vote for it's leader, or just keep it like it is, only allowing us Americans to vote?



Personally, I say we leave it like it is.


:shock:
you don`t rule anything..., America is bought and ruled by the China, Japan and Israel,
the rest of the world is fine...with or without your country, the only thing we get from you is stupid movies with pathetic happy ends, and financial cracks...
so concentrate to fix your own problems..., leave the rest of the world in "the stone age" we are fine there.... :-D


As long as we get to keep hot avatar girl... :-D


I would watch out for her....I hate to tell you, its just the angle of the photo. Its a bag over face moment, but if you use the old imagination, things still go as...excitingly as you would hope...



don`t be rude Semper, now you make my little dark angel to cry... :(
btw Buck, we could talk about a trade, I give you my avi girl, you give her your credit card, then your soul... :-D

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:37 am
by semper
THAT GUY wrote:bwahahahaha. Jack, this is awesome. Well done man, well done.


shush you, your on my turf. Dont make me get my people in london to kidnap you on your way to a museum...

@ RBR... Its her fault. Tell her next time not to charge so much!

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:29 am
by buck
Flash a knife, In london...

SHOCKING...

Apparently you havent been to london recently, How many stabbings is the big city on this year...i think it reached the 1k mark....

RBR...She can have my everything, Just as long as i can have herrrr....

=]

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:39 am
by Reschef
where is the "this thread is stupid" option in the poll?

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:05 pm
by Apadamek
bwahahahaha.

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:12 pm
by Dajjal
Robot Nixon wrote:
Stargater580 wrote:
Scruffy wrote:Another American who thinks their country rules the world.

If you guys rule the world then why did you guys have little to no support from other countries during the recent invasion?



Psschhh...


When was the last time we saw America get owned... NEBAH!!!!


I say we maybe give the other people not the right to elect leaders but maybe get them the right to at least wear shoes in our presence...

:P

I like this proposal. :-k


Yeah.... running for president when I get old enough.....



This country needs a new class of presidents.....

P.S.


Free World - America is the only one cool enough to be in it so UK, Canada, Mexico... any other countries not important enough to mention.... You will have to wait til you get tall enough to ride the roller coaster...
:-D

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:27 am
by Apadamek
Stargater580 wrote:
Robot Nixon wrote:
Stargater580 wrote:
Scruffy wrote:Another American who thinks their country rules the world.

If you guys rule the world then why did you guys have little to no support from other countries during the recent invasion?



Psschhh...


When was the last time we saw America get owned... NEBAH!!!!


I say we maybe give the other people not the right to elect leaders but maybe get them the right to at least wear shoes in our presence...

:P

I like this proposal. :-k


Yeah.... running for president when I get old enough.....



This country needs a new class of presidents.....

P.S.


Free World - America is the only one cool enough to be in it so UK, Canada, Mexico... any other countries not important enough to mention.... You will have to wait til you get tall enough to ride the roller coaster...
:-D



don't you mean you have to be "this American" to ride the roller coaster of awesomatic freedom?

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:33 am
by Biscuit
THAT GUY wrote:lfreedom?


You "free" Americans do realize that any law that controls your country means it's not free :?

You guys do realize that "freedom" is no more than a word to get you idiots pumped up with the old feeling of patriotism :lol:
"USA is #1" :lol:

If you idiots think your free then go to the white house and take a piss on the white house lawn and see what happens

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:51 am
by Rienna
Scruffy wrote:
THAT GUY wrote:lfreedom?


You "free" Americans do realize that any law that controls your country means it's not free :?

You guys do realize that "freedom" is no more than a word to get you idiots pumped up with the old feeling of patriotism :lol:
"USA is #1" :lol:

If you idiots think your free then go to the white house and take a **Filtered** on the white house lawn and see what happens



LMAO. indeed.


supposing the leader of the US really was the leader of the world (free or otherwise) please explain the following:

-why is it so easy to hide money from the government in oversea banks?
-why is it fugitives living abroad are almost never found or brought to justice?
-why was the US unable to get backup by most of the world for the war in iraq?
-why are most of the country's assests owed via debts to other countries?
-why must US citizens be required to have passports to enter other countries? (I mean, if you lead the world, it shouldn't matter where you go, right?)



oh right. cause you don't lead the world (free or otherwise).

thus, you guys can keep your elections to yourselves. we'll look after our own countries needs, you can look after yours.


Besides, I do believe that the UN has some sort of agreement about not stepping on the sovereignty of another nation, and since the US seems to think it's part of the UN........

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:04 am
by Apadamek
Rienna wrote:
-why is it so easy to hide money from the government in oversea banks? Oversea banks have safes made of tyrannic Swiss metal, the kryptonite of America.
-why is it fugitives living abroad are almost never found or brought to justice? not living in America is punishment enough
-why was the US unable to get backup by most of the world for the war in iraq? you polish hating racist.
-why are most of the country's assests owed via debts to other countries? Cause people are stupid enough to think we will actually pay them?
-why must US citizens be required to have passports to enter other countries? (I mean, if you lead the world, it shouldn't matter where you go, right?) to make you guys feel better.

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:11 am
by Rienna
THAT GUY wrote:
Rienna wrote:
-why is it so easy to hide money from the government in oversea banks? Oversea banks have safes made of tyrannic Swiss metal, the kryptonite of America.
-why is it fugitives living abroad are almost never found or brought to justice? not living in America is punishment enough
-why was the US unable to get backup by most of the world for the war in iraq? you polish hating racist.
-why are most of the country's assests owed via debts to other countries? Cause people are stupid enough to think we will actually pay them?
-why must US citizens be required to have passports to enter other countries? (I mean, if you lead the world, it shouldn't matter where you go, right?) to make you guys feel better.




....are you kidding me? and I like the polish hating racist thing... riiiiiight. You guys **Filtered** and whined that nobody posted serious posts in this thread in responce to the topic and when I ask valid questions you call me names you pulled outta your freaking ass?....

...and yet 99% of the american population gets insulted when the rest of the world called them ignorant idiots?...

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:13 am
by Apadamek
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinatio ... ce_in_Iraq
#
# Poland: 200 invasion—2,500 peak (withdrawn 10/08)

How dare you discredit Poland. Racist.

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:25 am
by Rienna
THAT GUY wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinational_force_in_Iraq
#
# Poland: 200 invasion—2,500 peak (withdrawn 10/08)

How dare you discredit Poland. Racist.



*rolls eyes*

Rienna wrote:-why was the US unable to get backup by most of the world for the war in iraq?


did I say all of the world? did I discredit the polish in any way shape or form? no. I said unable to gain the support of MOST of the world.


Robot Nixon wrote:
Rienna wrote:...and yet 99% of the american population gets insulted when the rest of the world called them ignorant idiots?...

Aye, you racist you! :x


no... impossible.

rac⋅ism
   /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.


race
2   /reɪs/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [reys] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a group of persons related by common descent or heredity.
2. a population so related.
3. Anthropology.
a. any of the traditional divisions of humankind, the commonest being the Caucasian, Mongoloid, and Negro, characterized by supposedly distinctive and universal physical characteristics: no longer in technical use.
b. an arbitrary classification of modern humans, sometimes, esp. formerly, based on any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape, and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups.
c. a human population partially isolated reproductively from other populations, whose members share a greater degree of physical and genetic similarity with one another than with other humans.

A⋅mer⋅i⋅can
   /əˈmɛrɪkən/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [uh-mer-i-kuhn] Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. of or pertaining to the United States of America or its inhabitants: an American citizen.
2. of or pertaining to North or South America; of the Western Hemisphere: the American continents.
3. of or pertaining to the aboriginal Indians of North and South America, usually excluding the Eskimos, regarded as being of Asian ancestry and marked generally by reddish to brownish skin, black hair, dark eyes, and prominent cheekbones.
–noun
4. a citizen of the United States of America.
5. a native or inhabitant of the Western Hemisphere.
6. an Indian of North or South America.
7. American English.
8. a steam locomotive having a four-wheeled front truck, four driving wheels, and no rear truck.





THUS! (I know, took awhile to get to my point)... by the very definition of the word, not a racist. American does not qualify as a "race".

Re: Should we allow

Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:26 am
by Apadamek
Rienna wrote:
THAT GUY wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinational_force_in_Iraq
#
# Poland: 200 invasion—2,500 peak (withdrawn 10/08)

How dare you discredit Poland. Racist.



*rolls eyes*

Rienna wrote:-why was the US unable to get backup by most of the world for the war in iraq?


did I say all of the world? did I discredit the polish in any way shape or form? no. I said unable to gain the support of MOST of the world.


Robot Nixon wrote:
Rienna wrote:...and yet 99% of the american population gets insulted when the rest of the world called them ignorant idiots?...

Aye, you racist you! :x


no... impossible.

rac⋅ism
   /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.


race
2   /reɪs/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [reys] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a group of persons related by common descent or heredity.
2. a population so related.
3. Anthropology.
a. any of the traditional divisions of humankind, the commonest being the Caucasian, Mongoloid, and Negro, characterized by supposedly distinctive and universal physical characteristics: no longer in technical use.
b. an arbitrary classification of modern humans, sometimes, esp. formerly, based on any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape, and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups.
c. a human population partially isolated reproductively from other populations, whose members share a greater degree of physical and genetic similarity with one another than with other humans.

A⋅mer⋅i⋅can
   /əˈmɛrɪkən/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [uh-mer-i-kuhn] Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. of or pertaining to the United States of America or its inhabitants: an American citizen.
2. of or pertaining to North or South America; of the Western Hemisphere: the American continents.
3. of or pertaining to the aboriginal Indians of North and South America, usually excluding the Eskimos, regarded as being of Asian ancestry and marked generally by reddish to brownish skin, black hair, dark eyes, and prominent cheekbones.
–noun
4. a citizen of the United States of America.
5. a native or inhabitant of the Western Hemisphere.
6. an Indian of North or South America.
7. American English.
8. a steam locomotive having a four-wheeled front truck, four driving wheels, and no rear truck.





THUS! (I know, took awhile to get to my point)... by insulting americans, I am not a racist, as the US is a melting pot, and doesn't qualify as having it's own "race"


How dare you say that Poland is not part of most of the world...Also, you're right, being American does not make you a race.

Being a being of pure florescent freedom does.