StarGateWars Forums

Time to Load Page allianceAttackLog.php at 19:06 : 82.379840 seconds

Time to Load Page bank.php at 19:10 : 0.312268 seconds

Time to Load Page militaryRecords.php at 19:11 : 0.297810 seconds

271 Players On!


i would suggest to begin tracking using the same pages and data, at different time, so u can qualify your complain

i agree the lag sucks, when farming i can hit a whole page, and then have to repair/bank twice before the page catches up , so that at the server level, not my server or my machine

Well, in that case we should all be fine so long as we dont attack multiple targets, a single target multiple times, or open our inbox.

Sounds like a plan to me...

buck wrote:Well, in that case we should all be fine so long as we dont attack multiple targets, a single target multiple times, or open our inbox.

Sounds like a plan to me...

great, that sounds like a perfect plan

just.. no more massing, raiding farming, or communicating. i can so live with that

sniperbull wrote:

buck wrote:Well, in that case we should all be fine so long as we dont attack multiple targets, a single target multiple times, or open our inbox.

Sounds like a plan to me...

great, that sounds like a perfect plan

just.. no more massing, raiding farming, or communicating. i can so live with that

Indeed.

Although noone actually cares...Is ascended affected too? I would check myself but im off to bed.

buck wrote:

sniperbull wrote:

buck wrote:Well, in that case we should all be fine so long as we dont attack multiple targets, a single target multiple times, or open our inbox.

Sounds like a plan to me...

great, that sounds like a perfect plan

just.. no more massing, raiding farming, or communicating. i can so live with that

Indeed.

Although noone actually cares...Is ascended affected too?

Not sure. ive only been playing ascended for less than a year, so im not sure how it used to be, compared to now.

buck wrote:Although noone actually cares...Is ascended affected too? I would check myself but im off to bed.

Not that I have noticed.

I cant remember if they are run off the same server or not, Then i was thinking you could split the servers in half, and have Perg in one server system, and main in anouther, but then, i dont know if that already happens, would at all help, or is indeed possible to have the same ranking system split over 2 different serveing systems. Or even if i am makeing sense.

buck wrote:I cant remember if they are run off the same server or not, Then i was thinking you could split the servers in half, and have Perg in one server system, and main in anouther, but then, i dont know if that already happens, would at all help, or is indeed possible to have the same ranking system split over 2 different serveing systems. Or even if i am makeing sense.

I understand what your saying. i guess it could be possible if you try and run them as you could a master and slave drive in a computer.

Although my server knowledge is almost non existant so i could be wrong

lol... before anyone else does, I'll say it - get rid of purgatory?

Especially if it's causing lag

Tekki wrote:lol... before anyone else does, I'll say it - get rid of purgatory?

Especially if it's causing lag

great idea... why didnt i say that?

hmmm ive never had any long page loads except when looking into the assults on alliance page. other than that, nothing

buck wrote:Indeed, massing isnt too easy, and a few times (there have been a few cases ive heard of other people) the game has to catch up, and carries on massing for a few minutes afterwards...even if you close you Internetz That was a bit of a shock to me first time that happened.

try logging in a few hours later and seeing your strike weps being damaged and still attacking the same guy that no is fun

down with purgatory

This is lame! 315 Players On! I have DSL too

Time to Load Page attacklog.php at 0:27 : 24.532323 seconds

buck wrote:I cant remember if they are run off the same server or not, Then i was thinking you could split the servers in half, and have Perg in one server system, and main in anouther, but then, i dont know if that already happens, would at all help, or is indeed possible to have the same ranking system split over 2 different serveing systems. Or even if i am makeing sense.

Yeah, I get what you're saying, run two parallel servers, halving the workload on the existing server. I have a better idea: what if the server's RAM was boosted? I'm talking gigs upon gigs. But the problem arises:will those experiencing the lag be willing to finance the server?