Page 3 of 7

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:07 am
by murkar
Well, see, the big problem I can see is that Frodo Baggins is hiding in your sig...

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:31 pm
by Awaken Knight
i want to place this signature into the SOTW...

Image

But, the rules state that the sig has to be at maximum 400x265 and mine is 430x200..
I have messaged murkar about an exception and he has replied with

You must ask, in the discussion, if anybody else minds. Since their sig size was limited, an exception should only be made if they are compensated for the limitations which you did not have to endure, or if they decide that they do not mind it.


so..its up to you, if you do decide that i have to stay within the rules without the exception, i will see what i can do to make it smaller and not ruin the sig.

I am also hoping to get replies from everyone by friday.

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:43 pm
by Empy
I didn't know there was a size limit, and I don't mind since it's so close. If it was like a background size image then it might matter, but in my opinion, that's fine :D.

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:06 pm
by murkar
~jin~ wrote:i want to place this signature into the SOTW...

Image

But, the rules state that the sig has to be at maximum 400x265 and mine is 430x200..
I have messaged murkar about an exception and he has replied with

You must ask, in the discussion, if anybody else minds. Since their sig size was limited, an exception should only be made if they are compensated for the limitations which you did not have to endure, or if they decide that they do not mind it.


so..its up to you, if you do decide that i have to stay within the rules without the exception, i will see what i can do to make it smaller and not ruin the sig.

I am also hoping to get replies from everyone by friday.



Also, remember, you don't need to have any large number of votes - just as long as there are no known objections. You already know that you have my approval a long as there are no objections...

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:43 pm
by Colton
No objection here Jin :wink:

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:20 pm
by serrin
I really don't have an objection either, but I would say that I shaved 30px off of your pic and didn't really see any quality loss either. just a thought.

No fits, tantrums or panic attacks forthcoming from me though ;)

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:39 pm
by Solus
no objection here. its 30 pixels. i mean if we were dealing with an absurdly OTT overlap then i MAY have had a problem but its just 30 pixels....

this much. *holds index finger and thumb a couple of millimetres away from each other* (yes, i know, not literally.... on my screen its like a centimetre but hey its nothing. :P)

~soul

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:38 pm
by Thade
This being my first entry into SOTW wanted to try something completely different (though my fonts are still similar to my usual).
Image

thoughts and feedback?

Side note: I don't care about the slight size issue on Jin's sig.

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:33 am
by minisaiyan
i dont mind a small exception to the rules, but in future, it would be best to stay within the size so that people couldnt enter a wallpaper sized image saying well if he gets away with it i should. Lets be nice, let this one through, and maybe change the rule to within reason for the size limit, afterall, it still fits forum rules

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:05 am
by murkar
SuperSaiyan wrote:I don't see what it matters, size is only important if it goes to desktop proportions imo :P


It's not the size that counts; it's how you use it. :lol:

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:09 am
by murkar
lol

Next week this problem will be solved; I'll update the rules allowing for slightly larger sigs, and then no exceptiosn will be made.

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:20 am
by Andrew
I have an objection.... Oh wait no... no I don't it's fine.

I personally didn't think I'll be entering this one but alas request sig is done and am in this one. Just it's a smudge sig and i've not done smudging for ages and well it's not a bad try I think.

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:32 am
by Empy
Andrew wrote:Smudge sig... Been awhile since I've done smudging. ¬_¬

Image
Win.

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:47 am
by Cole
Image

My entry :P

Re: SOTW 5 Discussion

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:39 am
by Empy
SotW is back with a vengeance!!! This is probably the most entires so far, am I right? It's nice to see :-D