StarGateWars Forums

As a transformers noob...homage does not really bother me Other than OptBuckimus Prime, and Bumblebee, cannot really tell the others apart anyway

Spent quite some time wondering how Megatron was on the satellite and also dead at the bottom of the ocean

That guy with the suction thing, strangely reminded me of a balrog

I found the end a little like anticlimax. I thought it would take more to destroy the Head Honcho, and the machine which they had been struggling against the entire film. Having it done in a couple of blows from souped up O.P and some hush-hush weapons seemed a little.. short If it was that fragile, could they not have nuked it from a distance, and dealt with the head guy later

I also found the taking of the boy's parents to be quite unnecessary..I would have expected more of ransom demand over turning himself over, or more made of the scene where they're reunited, and the decepticons are supposed to be using them as bait..not just dumping them in egypt to run almost immediately into bumblebee and flee the scene (any idea why he takes them to the pyramid btw, the most dangerous place arguably? obviously not so they can cry for chad during his temporary death and provide additional 'feeling' )

I admit it had a lot of flaws, but overall I did find it very good Definitely worth watching in my books.

that was soundwave on the satelite not megatron...

New requirement for transformers 3..

mandatory nametags ..

Caprila wrote:New requirement for transformers 3..

mandatory nametags ..

FAIL CAP. FAIL.

Caprila wrote:New requirement for transformers 3..

mandatory nametags ..

They did that in the original movie and someone fudged up and ended up calling the tank decepticon Bot devestater, Which is of course, the big HUGE beaster in the 2nd film, I think the tank was meant to be destroyer or something else, But, to me, thats an inforgiveable error! They must be ..

...corrected.

Caprila wrote:Other than OptBuckimus Prime, and Bumblebee, cannot really tell the others apart anyway

I approve of this sentence.

I feel the first one was better, this it seemed the camera was never standing still but rather constantly rotating around whoever was having a conversation, got annoying after a while. Also this movie was more "Look how amazing our special effects are" rather than "Follow along with us as we tell a story using advanced computer animation" just my personal feelings.

One thing I did rather enjoy was the final battle scenes which reminded me so much of Team America where they destroy most of Egypt in a "Don't worry we stopped the terrorists *Thumbs up*" kind of way

i liked the slow run modes

ToToRo wrote:i liked the slow run modes

Yes, Yes... With the boobies.. up... and down... up... and down...

buck wrote:ALSO, his voice was fixed at the end of the first film, And wasnt working in this one again.... WHATS THAT ABOUT?!

Probably BB being a .. umm.. playful jester.



Devastator was WAY too weak. Also, given the ease with which he is defeated, The Fallen was right to stay in the Nemesis starship for like milennia.

And another thing! I thought the whole 10,000 BC like civilization was quite interesting.

buck wrote:

Caprila wrote:New requirement for transformers 3..

mandatory nametags ..

They did that in the original movie and someone fudged up and ended up calling the tank decepticon Bot devestater, Which is of course, the big HUGE beaster in the 2nd film, I think the tank was meant to be destroyer or something else, But, to me, thats an inforgiveable error! They must be ..

...corrected.

That was Brawl, not Destroyer..

Universe wrote:

buck wrote:

Caprila wrote:New requirement for transformers 3..

mandatory nametags ..

They did that in the original movie and someone fudged up and ended up calling the tank decepticon Bot devestater, Which is of course, the big HUGE beaster in the 2nd film, I think the tank was meant to be destroyer or something else, But, to me, thats an inforgiveable error! They must be ..

...corrected.

That was Brawl, not Destroyer..

Im sure you will find, if you rewatch the first film, they label something devestater that is not.

buck wrote:

Universe wrote:

buck wrote:

Caprila wrote:New requirement for transformers 3..

mandatory nametags ..

They did that in the original movie and someone fudged up and ended up calling the tank decepticon Bot devestater, Which is of course, the big HUGE beaster in the 2nd film, I think the tank was meant to be destroyer or something else, But, to me, thats an inforgiveable error! They must be ..

...corrected.

That was Brawl, not Destroyer..

Im sure you will find, if you rewatch the first film, they label something devestater that is not.

Yes. They call Brawl (the huge tank with regular and sonic cannons) Devastator, or rather, he calls himself Devastator. Like I said..
Or do you mean something else?


.. beep .. boom .. boom .. beep ..

Universe wrote:

buck wrote:

Universe wrote:

buck wrote:

Caprila wrote:New requirement for transformers 3..

mandatory nametags ..

They did that in the original movie and someone fudged up and ended up calling the tank decepticon Bot devestater, Which is of course, the big HUGE beaster in the 2nd film, I think the tank was meant to be destroyer or something else, But, to me, thats an inforgiveable error! They must be ..

...corrected.

That was Brawl, not Destroyer..

Im sure you will find, if you rewatch the first film, they label something devestater that is not.

Yes. They call Brawl (the huge tank with regular and sonic cannons) Devastator, or rather, he calls himself Devastator. Like I said..
Or do you mean something else?


.. beep .. boom .. boom .. beep ..

Im not quite sure why you even made a comment then...

buck wrote:

Universe wrote:

buck wrote:

Universe wrote:

buck wrote:

Caprila wrote:New requirement for transformers 3..

mandatory nametags ..

They did that in the original movie and someone fudged up and ended up calling the tank decepticon Bot devestater, Which is of course, the big HUGE beaster in the 2nd film, I think the tank was meant to be destroyer or something else, But, to me, thats an inforgiveable error! They must be ..

...corrected.

That was Brawl, not Destroyer..

Im sure you will find, if you rewatch the first film, they label something devestater that is not.

Yes. They call Brawl (the huge tank with regular and sonic cannons) Devastator, or rather, he calls himself Devastator. Like I said..
Or do you mean something else?


.. beep .. boom .. boom .. beep ..

Im not quite sure why you even made a comment then...

Luckily for me, I am.

Universe wrote:

buck wrote:

Universe wrote:

buck wrote:

Universe wrote:

buck wrote:

Caprila wrote:New requirement for transformers 3..

mandatory nametags ..

They did that in the original movie and someone fudged up and ended up calling the tank decepticon Bot devestater, Which is of course, the big HUGE beaster in the 2nd film, I think the tank was meant to be destroyer or something else, But, to me, thats an inforgiveable error! They must be ..

...corrected.

That was Brawl, not Destroyer..

Im sure you will find, if you rewatch the first film, they label something devestater that is not.

Yes. They call Brawl (the huge tank with regular and sonic cannons) Devastator, or rather, he calls himself Devastator. Like I said..
Or do you mean something else?


.. beep .. boom .. boom .. beep ..

Im not quite sure why you even made a comment then...

Luckily for me, I am.

DECEPTICON!! DIe!!!!