StarGateWars Forums

Jack wrote:

BenjaminMS wrote:Or the fact that a lot of the bigger alliances are destroying each other? Ah well, time will tell. But other note: that Purg alliance is with 57 players. Average of 3 tril per player, while the bigger alliances need an average of approx 9 tril per player (which is nuts in wartime) to achieve that.
-Ben

Or the fact that the bigger alliances will not allow anyone in the top spot other than one of their own?

The "bigger alliances" are not the only ones capable of feilding players in the top ranks, however any time someone from a smaller, unknown alliance gets into the top ranks they are immediately massed. Perhaps it is also for this reason that people hide in purg?

LOL - I don't mind personally someone of the 'smaller alliances' in the top - only thing I dislike is that people do so while hiding for years in Purgatory.
-Ben

SuperSaiyan wrote:

Orpheus wrote:now to wonder

is this the achievement of the perg players

or the lack of power / skill from the non perg players ?

or a combination of the two

Ay, that's just it! No scapegoats.. we all suck.

~Insider Trader~ wrote:Good luck to those in purg. They play the game the way they want to play it and don't seem concerned about the views of the vocal minority of whinging sods who think that the massing - zero stats - war boredom is the only way to go.
Notice none of them have come here to state their case - they don't have to. They've been given the chance for a different style of play away from all the rubbish and random massings and ME hunter nonsense going on in 'normal' and they seem to prefer it. It's no wonder why the purg population is growing so quickly. Seems to me it's a much more happier place to be.

I agree. Afterall, don't people keep saying ranks ingame and of alliances are useless and not to care about (mainly because of AC being possible to skyboost accounts powers)?

And I would say, purgatory would be the correct spelling for the word. Well, that's compared to my own language way of saying it!

Apophis The Great wrote:And I would say, purgatory would be the correct spelling for the word. Well, that's compared to my own language way of saying it!

June 3rd, 2007. First criticism of the spelling of purgatory/pergatory.
Several dozen occasions post said date, various people comment on the spelling.

The idea that 'only a select few' notice is..
Either way.. who cares. Just two words: "Command Center".




Anyway.. this thread is good about purg, excellent idea by GeneralChaos: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=150634

Congrats to the guy.

Ya`ll know who/what is to blame for this. And it aint perg players.

Jack wrote:

Universe wrote:

Apophis The Great wrote:And I would say, purgatory would be the correct spelling for the word. Well, that's compared to my own language way of saying it!

June 3rd, 2007. First criticism of the spelling of purgatory/pergatory.
Several dozen occasions post said date, various people comment on the spelling.

The idea that 'only a select few' notice is..
Either way.. who cares. Just two words: "Command Center".




Anyway.. this thread is good about purg, excellent idea by GeneralChaos: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=150634

I do not think that it is that people do not notice as much as people do not care.

That was my point.

Universe wrote:

Jack wrote:

Universe wrote:

Apophis The Great wrote:And I would say, purgatory would be the correct spelling for the word. Well, that's compared to my own language way of saying it!

June 3rd, 2007. First criticism of the spelling of purgatory/pergatory.
Several dozen occasions post said date, various people comment on the spelling.

The idea that 'only a select few' notice is..
Either way.. who cares. Just two words: "Command Center".




Anyway.. this thread is good about purg, excellent idea by GeneralChaos: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=150634

I do not think that it is that people do not notice as much as people do not care.

That was my point.

To make this even MORE useless...I don't even believe in puergatory(nice one huh?) so should there be a word for it?

Ashu wrote:

Universe wrote:

Jack wrote:

Universe wrote:

Apophis The Great wrote:And I would say, purgatory would be the correct spelling for the word. Well, that's compared to my own language way of saying it!

June 3rd, 2007. First criticism of the spelling of purgatory/pergatory.
Several dozen occasions post said date, various people comment on the spelling.

The idea that 'only a select few' notice is..
Either way.. who cares. Just two words: "Command Center".




Anyway.. this thread is good about purg, excellent idea by GeneralChaos: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=150634

I do not think that it is that people do not notice as much as people do not care.

That was my point.

To make this even MORE useless...I don't even believe in puergatory(nice one huh?) so should there be a word for it?

Umm.. good heavens. We need to make it different.
Time for threading the needle in the strange places called .. umm.. debate section.

Tetrismonkey wrote:Alliance Name: Dark Deception
Rank: 1
Total Power: 194,156,609,290,943
Realm: Perg

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Player: Mightymidget
Rank: 1
Realm: Perg

If anybody want dance with him, send me PM and i will send you his ID.

Lower perg cap to 30/40m !!!! and add an auto kick function so people cant grow above it and stay there !!

Remove the 60 AT limit

That's overdoing it >> And there's already an autokick function, which is set at 40% above the max entering size.

I remember when I was in purg about 1 and half years ago, he had 250k raw up and 6 100bil income 4 100k up planets.

im assuming he would have 200bil income planets at least.

Tterisomnkey atleast put in the effort to copy paste my name please. And you broke your funny bone.

The underlying "point" however stands. The problem isnt the fact people that are hardcapped to 1/10th the normal realm size can climb ranks, it`s the rampant "debauchery" of main that enables and faclitates it either directly by massing page 1 every other week for no reason other than "lulz" and indirectly by forcing people into perg.
In this essence, I stand by my point.
It`s not perg that needs adjustment, not in the "tighten it" direction anyways, it`s main that requires an adjustment towards the perg style. Half way from both sides a normaly playable game possibly exist.

If people find it so horrible that perg has high ranked players, why don't they themselves go to perg and statbuild more than said people? Or just remain in main and try to beat them?
Wait, I thought alliance ranks didn't matter because of monsterous ACs out there?
There's something wrong...


Also, brdavs got it right...