Page 3 of 6

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:47 am
by Juliette
Agapooka wrote:So ebola is Gaia's equivalent of a human's penicillin. 8)

But the problem isn't solely in humanity. It is in how it behaves. Some cultures (bacteria have cultures and so do we, apparently :P) were able to operate in vivo without causing damage to the planet. Then the European culture came and there was competition and the European strain of humanity took prevalence and its primary conquest-profit mode of operation greatly contributed to the present state of the planet.

I have to go to work, or I'd make this post reply even longer and wittier.

Agapooka
Mainly due to the traditionalist's idea of "the more people, the merrier". Bloody proletarians and their lack of self control.

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:53 am
by Legendary Apophis
Universe wrote:Mainly due to the traditionalist's idea of "the more people, the merrier". Bloody proletarians and their lack of self control.

:lol:

Poor classes reproducing like rabbits to get more state help, then more working offspring in the service of the family lol. (stupid people! They don't realize they have more members to feed and therefore more to spend #-o )
I am not from the elite, but heck, I am a lone child. Also, in both sides of my family, not more than 2 children per parents. We got it right. Children aren't materials to use for your own benefit to gather €€ out of them a way or another! :evil:

It angers me alot to see that nowadays there are still loads of families going for like 5 children or more up to 12 or beyond, seriously, what the hell are they thinking?? #-o #-o

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:21 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Universe wrote:ROFLMAO. You would believe an sour lemon, a jealous idiot like Mims over Pianka?



Paul Joseph Watson April 5 2006


:? ?????? :?

P.S., i dont read or listen to any single source.

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:01 pm
by agapooka
Where I'm from, every woman was pressured to marry as soon as she was of age to produce kiddies. Once she was married she was required to produce one child per year, otherwise she'd go to hell - or so said the Catholic priest. This wasn't too long ago. My grandfather could tell you all about it...

An alternative explanation for why the lower classes are believed to produce more offspring is because they cannot afford condoms. :-$

Agapooka

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:09 pm
by Legendary Apophis
Agapooka wrote:Where I'm from, every woman was pressured to marry as soon as she was of age to produce kiddies. Once she was married she was required to produce one child per year, otherwise she'd go to hell - or so said the Catholic priest. This wasn't too long ago. My grandfather could tell you all about it...

An alternative explanation for why the lower classes are believed to produce more offspring is because they cannot afford condoms. :-$

Agapooka

Then he was a complete IDIOT. Radical fools... >_<

Lmao at alternative explanation, who knows!

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:16 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
you have a VERY narrow view of the world Jim, and i'm sorry to break this to you mate, i really am...BUT, the world doesn't fit into your neat and tidy view.

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:05 am
by Legendary Apophis
[KMA]Avenger wrote:you have a VERY narrow view of the world Jim, and i'm sorry to break this to you mate, i really am...BUT, the world doesn't fit into your neat and tidy view.

:roll:

Well, at least I make sure that I follow pathes where my "co-believers" aren't as evil (if not more) as the ones I think I am denouncing thru my actions. :)

Sources:
Article previously quoted and tranlated in english,
[spoiler]
In conspiracy theory, the term "New World Order" (the capital letters are distinguishing) refers to the advent of a cryptocratic or totalitarian one-world government.

The common theme in conspiracy theories about a New World Order is that a powerful and secretive group of globalists is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an autonomous world government, which would replace sovereign states and other checks and balances in international power struggles. Significant occurrences in politics and finance are speculated to be caused by an extremely influential cabal operating through many front organizations. Numerous historical and current events are seen as steps in an on-going plot to achieve world domination through secret political gatherings and decision-making processes.

Prior to the early 1990s, New World Order conspiracism was limited to two subcultures, primarily the militantly antigovernment right, and secondarily Christian fundamentalists concerned with end-time emergence of the Antichrist. Social critics, such as political scientist Michael Barkun, have expressed concern that paranoid conspiracy theories about a New World Order have now not only been embraced by the far left but have seeped into popular culture, thereby inaugurating an unrivaled period of millenarian activity in the United States of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. They warn that this development may not only fuel lone-wolf terrorism but have devastating effects on American political life, such as producerist demagogy influencing elections as well as domestic and foreign policy.[2][3][4][5][6]
[/spoiler]

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:11 am
by Juliette
[KMA]Avenger wrote:you have a VERY narrow view of the world Jim, and i'm sorry to break this to you mate, i really am...BUT, the world doesn't fit into your neat and tidy view.

The eye sees what it wants to see. We see order. You see chaos (but within that chaos the evil hand of Satan - something we call 'order'). Essentially, we see the same things. We just don't give a crap.

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:56 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Universe wrote:We just don't give a crap.


that's plainly obvious and also, that's yours and everyone elses problem right there...

you should care, care for your fellow human beings, care that you are being robbed of your money and labour, care you are being lied to, care that your leader/s doesn't give a crap for you or your country, care who is at the heart of all the drug running, care for the children that are being abducted by CPS and the CIA, care that high technology's are being suppressed and kept secret, care that for NO reason whatsoever people are dying of starvation all over the world, care that the health care and education systems are a disgrace, care that abortion, eugenics and the destruction of the family has and is funded by the Rockefeller's, care that wars are waged in the name of freedom, fighting oppression and terrorism but are in fact wars of terror, care that global warming is a scam, care that the catholic church is a satanic institution bent on suppressing knowledge...on and on...

the hypocrisy apathy, laziness and downright stupidity of this world makes me want to throw up!

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:40 am
by Legendary Apophis
Well that was almost as big & complete as wiki's list of conspiracy theories! :D

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:49 am
by [KMA]Avenger
that's true Jim, the trouble is, none of those are theories and my list above isn't complete ;)

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:41 am
by agapooka
me wrote:Do you believe that humanity is nothing more than an infection upon this living planet and that Earth needs its equivalent of penicillin?

It's because various cultures of humans have mutated to form a dangerous and more contagious strain causing Chronic Avaritis, among other things.


Avenger, who says that human life is valuable? You? Are you human? Aren't you biased, then? Then again, maybe all life is sacred, but all the more to rid the world of entities corrupted by chronic avaritis. ;p

Agapooka

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:00 am
by Legendary Apophis
Agapooka wrote:
me wrote:Do you believe that humanity is nothing more than an infection upon this living planet and that Earth needs its equivalent of penicillin?

It's because various cultures of humans have mutated to form a dangerous and more contagious strain causing Chronic Avaritis, among other things.


Avenger, who says that human life is valuable? You? Are you human? Aren't you biased, then? Then again, maybe all life is sacred, but all the more to rid the world of entities corrupted by chronic avaritis. ;p

Agapooka

Don't forget there isn't a "superior race" or superior being" (aside of God[s]), and therefore, noone around has the right to decide on humanity's ending. Just because monsters such as Hitler thought they were better than others -while obviously he wasn't- decided to terminate a big amount of people, doesn't mean he was right or "allowed" to do so.

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:55 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Agapooka wrote:
me wrote:Do you believe that humanity is nothing more than an infection upon this living planet and that Earth needs its equivalent of penicillin?

It's because various cultures of humans have mutated to form a dangerous and more contagious strain causing Chronic Avaritis, among other things.


Avenger, who says that human life is valuable? You? Are you human? Aren't you biased, then? Then again, maybe all life is sacred, but all the more to rid the world of entities corrupted by chronic avaritis. ;p

Agapooka



you misunderstood my friend, i wasn't assuming that only human life is sacred, but if we can do to each other the things we do, then nothing is taboo as far as killing/murder, maiming of animals goes...

if you have the stomach for it, i suggest you watch the film Earthlings. don't worry, its nothing to do with conspiracy's or aliens or anything like that, its a VERY powerful film showing the utter contempt of man over the beats of the world...its not nice viewing!




Apophis The Great wrote:
Agapooka wrote:
me wrote:Do you believe that humanity is nothing more than an infection upon this living planet and that Earth needs its equivalent of penicillin?

It's because various cultures of humans have mutated to form a dangerous and more contagious strain causing Chronic Avaritis, among other things.


Avenger, who says that human life is valuable? You? Are you human? Aren't you biased, then? Then again, maybe all life is sacred, but all the more to rid the world of entities corrupted by chronic avaritis. ;p

Agapooka

Don't forget there isn't a "superior race" or superior being" (aside of God[s]), and therefore, noone around has the right to decide on humanity's ending. Just because monsters such as Hitler thought they were better than others -while obviously he wasn't- decided to terminate a big amount of people, doesn't mean he was right or "allowed" to do so.



the problem with citing Hitler (this applies to me as well) is that we call people like Hitler (Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung, Pol Pot , etc. etc. etc) animals, monsters and so on, but who is the bigger monster here, "people" like Hitler and the rest, or those that financially backed these kinds of "people" and helped them get into power because "they" knew what "they" would do once in power???

Re: Citation Vs. Nonsuch (Apophis The Great vs. Citation)

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:24 am
by agapooka
The animals don't have chronic avaritis. ;)

Apophis, you're right in saying that no human has the right to decide on humanity's ending. So, why are corporations destroying the planet? Why are governments subsidising those corporations? Why are armies killing and destroying? Why are all of those actions funded by HUMANS? Chronic avaritis. Do you understand why there are some of us who question entities who act in a way that we both agree they don't have the right to act?

Agapooka