StarGateWars Forums

buck wrote:

Clarkey wrote:http://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?f=209&t=157462

^^ I made a post in the above thread. It was on topic, relevant to the thread.

My post has since been removed and sent to dump.

I have no absolute knowledge of who moved it to dump but I guess it was Tetrismonkey.

Earlier today in the Mod Forums Tetrismonkey made these statements:

Tetrismonkey wrote:Clarkey, do you honestly think we want you around? Get the **Filtered** out of here. You did you apology, so now **Filtered** off. Either shut up about all this or I will personly make your time on these forums a livig hell.

Tetrismonkey wrote:Yo **Filtered**, for now on, if you make a post in the For Admin section, I'm going to move all your posts to the dump. If it cost me my job, so be it.

I think that says enough.

Can i just point out to the admins, Clarkey has just revealed posts from the Mod forums, As such he should have his access to said forums immediatly Revoked. Hes broke the rulez thar!

On the note that this "evidence" presented is infact, of a dubious nature and was obtained through illegal means, I forward the motion that this evidence is infact, mere propaganda, Used only to slate TetrisMonkey.

little kimmy wrote:

Clarkey wrote:

little kimmy wrote:this isn't even an Ombs issue. this is an admin issue...

way to go shooting yourself in the foot here.

Erm lol what planet you living on?

A Moderator unfairly mods my post by moving said post which was on topic and relevant to the thread at hand to the dump.

So where is it NOT an Ombudsman issue?

I'm living on the planet where the Mod admin takes care openly biased moderators as part of their duties, a position that was created under your adminship, if you remember.

the issue is with the mod, which btw, should've been discussed via the chain of command before ombudsman. Ombudsman is supposed to be the "final" method of appeal, instead of the first.

the individual post is nitpicky, but instead of handling this with respect to the admins you left behind, you bypassed them, and decided to air even more of your dirty laundry in public, because you LOVE playing the Martyr apparently.
so tell me, are you really sorry you deleted jack and the temple? or are you only pretending to be, by doing what you promised jason you would, as his pennance for giving you a second chance? cause your attitude certainly doesn't declare "apologetic", it declares self-rightiousness.

Tetrismonkey wrote:All of you that support clarkey seem to be missing a few things. He used his seat as a Admin to delete jacks accounts, and a section, 15% of the database just to get back at someone. Granted what I'm doing is no better, but seeing as people are unable to act upon this, I chose to go it my own way.

The purple group, allows former admins that made cotributions to the forum during there reign, to have access to the mod section, and to have the honor of that color and group. Now, clarkey a man that abuse his position as an Admin, is allowed the honor of that color, that group? He forfited this the second he started his crap.

So before you just jump on the band wagon to support clarkey because he deleted Jack, which in turn did nothing, but actually complicate him getting fired. Clarkey actions are still being felt, the division between the community and mods only grows more and more because of this.

So, fire me, strip me of my privlages and color. Keep in mind, if you do this, clarkey must also have the same done to him.

Also, I apologize to everyone else that may be upset at my actions, and I would never act this way to any of you. I mod unbaised, but this situation is not the normal curcumstanes.

Dr. House wrote:

Clarkey wrote:How can someone who has openly admitted that they are biased towards me and will continue to victimise and bully me and abuse his Mod powers until he gets his own way continue to be a Mod on these forums?

The same way you did what you did and have somehow managed to get special privileges. Then again, considering where you had to put your lips, I'm not sure if Tetrismonkey really cares to keep his job that badly.

hitchkok wrote:from what i've seen of jack i gather he's an **Filtered**.

Which isn't much.

Dr. House wrote:

Clarkey wrote:but I know some people on the team were pleased that I had made my apologies.

I don't think anyone has doubted the fact that there are idiots on the mod team, but thanks for informing us anyway.

zeekomkommer wrote:tetris says he won't do it anymore once clarkey isn't purple anymore
clarkey isn't purple anymore

Clarkey wrote:

zeekomkommer wrote:tetris says he won't do it anymore once clarkey isn't purple anymore
clarkey isn't purple anymore

Yes, just the fact i'm no longer purple doesn't make the fact that he won't do it anymore alright. I hope the Admins will agree with that.

buck wrote:Clarkey didnt get punished for his crimes, He got rewarded. So acts of vigilantism are only naturally going to happen. I dont condone them, but they wouldnt have happened in the first place if clarkey had been banned/removed/not allowed back to the forum.

So its not anyones fault but his own for persueing the matter of being allowed back, and then crying as if he is some sort of victim.

OH but your bullying me?!

OH but you deleted users and part of the forum?!

I think clarkey should feel greatful that he is even ON the forums, on that basis alone i urge the ombudsperson to call and end to the whole matter, And ignore anything else clarkey posts.

buck wrote:I feel it would be unfair to complain about anything tetris monkey does if he is only acting under what must be described as Duress and Panic.

Clarkey wrote:

buck wrote:I feel it would be unfair to complain about anything tetris monkey does if he is only acting under what must be described as Duress and Panic.

So why did Sarevok and Thriller and SuperSaiyan not act in the same manner?