Page 3 of 3

Re: multi?

Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:15 pm
by shane w
yes

Re: multi?

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:38 am
by Field Marshall
Was stuff here - but is no longer valid

Re: multi?

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:42 am
by RoKeT
It is not True

Re: multi?

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:30 am
by Apophis
RoKeT wrote:Do not accuse Taddpole again or i will mass you and sit on you till you cry like a little baby, lol actually taddpole is like a 50 year old man and you know why i've never considered him, because i've met him lol and he is a great guy, he does more in his life for people then you could ever imagine some jokes should never be said change your post!


And That Will Mean The Involvement Of Pops!

Re: multi?

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:31 am
by Field Marshall
I don't like multis

Re: multi?

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:32 am
by RoKeT
I know i sorry you don't understand... I'll PM you! lol