Page 3 of 4
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:50 am
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
harchester wrote:Dastupy and Ralph broker me pleaseeeeeeee your both NERDS

seeing hes on vac you can broker me instead (jk)
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:02 am
by Londo Mollari
all chemistry is an explanation of physical phonomenon, which obeys the laws of physics
all physics is maths

Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:44 pm
by Reschef
Londo Mollari wrote:all physics is maths
I hope you're kidding. Maths is just a ancillary "science".
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:00 pm
by Unimatrix881
I'm in physics myself. I love it way more than chemistry, but the only downside to me is how solving almost any problem after second year involves integration in one way or another.
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:50 pm
by Londo Mollari
Reschef wrote:Londo Mollari wrote:all physics is maths
I hope you're kidding. Maths is just a ancillary "science".
no im not, physics is merely applied mathematics
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:21 pm
by Dubby_CompGamerGeek2
Londo Mollari wrote:Reschef wrote:Londo Mollari wrote:all physics is maths
I hope you're kidding. Maths is just a ancillary "science".
no im not, physics is merely applied mathematics
a lot of things are "merely applied mathematics"
let's start with engineering...

Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:35 am
by Londo Mollari
Dubby_CompGamerGeek2 wrote:Londo Mollari wrote:Reschef wrote:Londo Mollari wrote:all physics is maths
I hope you're kidding. Maths is just a ancillary "science".
no im not, physics is merely applied mathematics
a lot of things are "merely applied mathematics"
let's start with engineering...

indeed
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:42 am
by Reschef
Londo Mollari wrote:Dubby_CompGamerGeek2 wrote:Londo Mollari wrote:Reschef wrote:Londo Mollari wrote:all physics is maths
I hope you're kidding. Maths is just a ancillary "science".
no im not, physics is merely applied mathematics
a lot of things are "merely applied mathematics"
let's start with engineering...

indeed
still, maths isn't what it's all about. It's just a tool.
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:50 am
by Londo Mollari
maths is the methodology for proofs
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:16 am
by Zeratul
Legendary Jimster wrote:Zeratul wrote:what to vote when one considers "nerd" to be somewhat of a compliment, and one likes both chemical and physical experiments...
1-

not many people consider it as compliment
2- you didn't say "we"

x2
I voted chemistry because it was the one between both which I did like the least. We had same teacher for both in high school btw...
we wouldnt want to be 100% predictable, would we?
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:58 am
by harchester
I win
but i dont have brokers

Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:34 pm
by Corran Horne
i hate chemistry!
![[013.gif] :smt013](./images/smilies/013.gif)
and i can understand everything that sam carter says, so physics
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 10:20 pm
by stuff of legends
i would prefer physics over chem any day (wanting to be an astrophysicist), but we have a crap physics teacher who decides to round the acceleration due to gravity to 10 instead of 9.8 to do his calculations and he gets off track every 2.6 seconds. So they are painfully slow lessons and you learn crap all. That's if you don't know what your doing already.
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 10:53 pm
by Zeratul
that sounds almost like some place in the US that made it a rule to define pi to be 4...
Re: Physics vs Chemistry
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 11:15 pm
by stuff of legends