Page 3 of 3

Re: The British Monarchy and Lady Diana general discussion...

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:31 am
by Hitchkok
Londo Mollari wrote:its interesting...in a world so hung up on sexual/racial/religious/any other discernable difference equality, the british monarchy is passed along the first born male child in a family of protestants

both sexist and intolerent of catholicism ](*,)

As far as i know, the law was ammended a couple of decades ago, and the heir is now the first born child, regardless of its gender.
and having a Catholic (or a person of any religion / church other than the Anglican) as a Monarch is... problematic. It classhes with the whole "Protector of Faith" and "Head of the Anglican Church" thing. A bit like having a Mormon Pope.

[KMA]Avenger wrote:see, this is what i was trying to avoid, a discussion about the genealogy which IS irrelevant to THIS discussion.

the fact of the matter is this, they pass themselves off as being "English" when they are not even British. they've gone to great lengths to hide their true identities to the point that they changed their name from Saxe Coburg Gotha to Windsor prior to the outbreak of WW2 because they didn't want the people to suddenly turn their anger on them....they've even ousted the king saying his abdication was because he wanted to marry the twice divorced Wallis Simpson...what a crock, the man was an ardent and publicly admitted supporter of Hitler and the Nazi's....


they are scum who have no qualms about praying on the public or their own blood. they have changed history and hidden the peoples resentment towards them, even to the point where the history books claim queen Victoria was popular when in fact she was hated and always hissed and jeered when she was in public.
i've run numerous searches on the net and having a VERY hard time trying to establish some facts why she was hated so i can show you. i know why she was hated, the people were taxed to death and forced to work in factories, even children were forced to slave away all because of her...but as i said, the history books make her out to be one of the most popular monarchs the country has ever known.


edit;

alo the bit about they have no real power is not true. whats not known publicly is that parliament has no power. parliament executes the power granted to them by the monarch, though the monarch doesn't execute the use of power (if you follow me?). in this way the monarch stays immune to public anger and wrath when things happen they don't like, or do you seriously think they would take the chance and suffer another Cromwell?


edit 2, remember, this is a family who have been practising incest and inbreeding for hundreds of years, to the point they now have to marry outside of their direct bloodline in order to have heirs. even Diana had said after giving birth to harry that she felt she was no longer needed or wanted after she had given birth to "an heir and as spare". once this bastard bloodline had got what they wanted from her they went to work doing what they do best...destroying people.


This isn't even internally consistent