StarGateWars Forums

Posted: **Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:57 pm**

go Baxter

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:46 am**

Go TT

For teh lulz :twisted:

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:03 pm**

so now that i am actually ready for this (having learnt a bit from my first night)

aaaaaaaaaand he has no defense.
as in, im measuring in the millions here
MS was massed too

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:22 pm**

Baxter wrote:so now that i am actually ready for this (having learnt a bit from my first night)

aaaaaaaaaand he has no defense.
as in, im measuring in the millions here
MS was massed too

don't count him out mate..

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:26 pm**

Hmmm I wonder if these two are able to get online at the same time because I know that wasn't his fully built MS

.

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:50 pm**

he was on at some point, he repaired his defence
fair enough if he cant be on for long

Posted: **Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:07 pm**

Mr Fag wrote:1. i wasn't online, gratz to massing my half built MS, and boasting about it.. Thats the FIRST time you've massed it.. so the fact your saying ur getting bored of massing it is utter BS..
2. i havnt been able to get online properly,
3. MS massed AGAIN, def massed AGAIN.

Posted: **Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:09 am**

double standards much??

1) i wasnt boasting
2) i wasnt online either

and if you didnt read, i said that it was fair enough if you couldnt be on

the least you could do is build a defense

EDIT:
and thats the second time youve sent your MS away [-X

Posted: **Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:29 am**

pitiful defence was massed again
though i must commend him on getting up past 10 bil in the first place :lol:

Posted: **Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:36 am**

Baxter wrote:pitiful defence was massed again
though i must commend him on getting up past 10 bil in the first place

Right so first of all you are acting the big man by boasting that your army size is 10x his.

Now you are trying to make him out to be pitiful by having a 10b+ defence even though he has 10x less army than you?

What sort of a fool are you?

Posted: **Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:42 am**

Clarkey wrote:
Baxter wrote:pitiful defence was massed again
though i must commend him on getting up past 10 bil in the first place

Right so first of all you are acting the big man by boasting that your army size is 10x his.

Now you are trying to make him out to be pitiful by having a 10b+ defence even though he has 10x less army than you?

What sort of a fool are you?

what sort of fool are you?

he has 14 mil army
1 mil attackers
was 120k defenders
500k spies
thats enough left to build a defense (surely that maths isnt too hard to follow)

he is choosing to not have a defense
he could easily get one bigger than mine, his MS has a few more weapons than mine
this means that he COULD get a defense, yet chooses not to
he has the turns, so can get the naq or UUs for it, yet doesnt
whos the fool now clarkey?

half the problem is that he is acting big, yet wont build a defence to match his ego
*looks at own defence*
its been massed down a few times, and ive built it back up

Posted: **Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:05 am**

Baxter wrote:whos the fool now clarkey?

I think you are.

You see, the problem with you is, that at the start you are happy enough to point out to Mr Fag that you have a 10x big army than him.

Now, if he lets say put 5m in to defence and you did the same, and you both lose it all, then who's affected more? you or him? He would be, because he'd drop to 9m and you'd have been on like 125m or something... you'd still come here laughing about it. That would mean he'd lose 35% army opposed to your 3.5% army

What you have to take in to consideration is his small army which means less resource. Stop looking at what size his defence is and take his entire account in to consideration, and also take his style of game play in to consideration.

Maybe once you've done that then you won't be the fool anymore.

Posted: **Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:21 am**

so yeah, comparatively he has lost twice as much as i have
yet if he built a defence, that might be a bit more even

really, he shouldnt have accepted the vendetta if he couldnt really keep up a decent fight
i wouldnt have judged him, rather accepted this fact
which, i must say, is probably a hades of a lot more than you wouldve done in the same spot

Posted: **Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:24 am**

Baxter wrote:so yeah, comparatively he has lost twice as much as i have
yet if he built a defence, that might be a bit more even

really, he shouldnt have accepted the vendetta if he couldnt really keep up a decent fight
i wouldnt have judged him, rather accepted this fact
which, i must say, is probably a hades of a lot more than you wouldve done in the same spot

Sorry but coming from someone that was boasting about his army size compared to his opponent i fail to believe you would have accepted the fact and not have laughed at him because he chose to not accept.

Fact is he did accept, and you are not the maker of rules in this war.... war has no rules.

Posted: **Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:34 am**

believe what you will clarkey, this is not your fight
and lets get this straight, i wasnt boasting about my army size, merely pointing out a fact
history teaches us many things
conquered, i conquered; history is written by the victors... many others that i cant think of right now
most importantly the one about david and goliath
not everyone is a david

war has rules
the UN shouldve taught you that
silly, silly clarkey
you only need to look at the war on terror

StarGateWars Forums

Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)

Re: Me VS Mr Fag (34220)