MEZZANINE wrote:
Not true mate, read my post above, the difference is the different reasons/intentions men and women have for signing up to the Police Force.
Irrelevant piece of information.
Despite the political correctness BS, I would say the majority of women join the police because of good intentions or trying to prove themselves as equal to men, and the majority of men join because of negative personality traits.
Again irrelevant.
ps Not saying that women have less value then men, but we are not equal, mental and physical differences mean men and women have difference potentials in difference things, I personally from 18 years working have found women make far better managers and team leaders.
Yet again irrelevant.
If you have read my posts, it is about the definition of police officer being the same as policeman/policewoman.
The term police officer is used as a substitute to make a sentance flow more easliy.
I.e Two police officers came to my house yesterday.
instead of:
A policeman and a policewoman came to my house yesterday.
The issue lies where KMA claims that policeman/policewomen are different to police officers. However that is not so much the boggle of things.
The problem he makes a claim, and then says these documents are evidence, "Look it up yourself". That is D standard of work.
E; Making a claim.
D: Making a claim with some evidence.
C: Making a claim with relevant evidence, supported by excerpts from evidence. i.e Quotes
B: Making a claim with relevant evidence, supported by excerpts from evidence. i.e Quotes. Explaining these excerpts and how they prove what you are saying.
A: Making a claim with relevant evidence, supported by excerpts from evidence. i.e Quotes. Explaining these excerpts and how they prove what you are saying. Through the use of contextualisation. In a clear and concise manner.
Note: This is just a basic list.
In where, my previous post, I gave a dictionary definition. Which, 1. Supports my claim, 2. Is relevant evident. 3. Has been quoted and sourced. 4. Has been shown how they prove what i am saying. 5. And has been contextualised. 6. Done in a simple manner which is not a wall of text.
In where, he has just said go here, go there, watch this. Not acceptable in the least. 1. Youtube is not credible. Anyone can post on youtube 2. The documents are either or both, off topic, i.e NWO or Country specific; 3. There are no quotes or direct citations in his claims. Besides the fact acronyms for reports are highly unhelpful.
KMA is a smart man, and hence i hold this high ridged standard for him. And for everyone on this form.
So until he proves me, and the dictionary wrong. He must concede defeat.
Kit-Fox wrote:The point KMA is making that is there is a difference between a police officer (officer of PR sakes theres) & a Peace Officer.
And there is a difference, but it is sometimes hard to see as not every country has both
Never mentioned peace officer. Sorry, but it is the difference between a police officer, and a policeman/woman.
Which there is none.