Page 3 of 4
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:53 pm
by Clarkey
Sarevok wrote:Duderanch wrote:Sarevok wrote:[spoiler]
LegendaryA wrote:Sarevok wrote:LegendaryA wrote:Sarevok wrote:Z E R O wrote:I think somewhere I heard that 24 and 25 would never be released... does anyone know if that's true?
I seriously hope NOT! Going to 23 already ruined parts of the game (aka taking losses of some form, being blessed more then not being blessed)
If anything, refund everyone that ascended the ascension requirements, and go back to the maximum of 10 ascensions...
Maximum 20 then..NO WAY I downgrade from AGoL!

(moreover, le the worst names of ascension levels are found after Origin of Existence..)
You know i said you'd get refunded for every ascension you have made?
I didn't spend all those ressources and time to go back to yuckish LG title (even AG wouldn't really satisfy me for reason I will tell).
Refund wouldn't change much if it was down to AG (I mean, it would have been quite a waste of time for all). Moreover, in my option, less people would be concerned, and they would loose less if it was down to 20th (23rd to 20th is less issues than 23rd to 10th) not to mention the MASSIVE amount of reversed-to-AG people if it was down to 10. Seriously if ALL people from EAG to Unknown get reversed to AG...that would be ridiculous. Not to mention all the cool names being gone.
People shouldn't lose their covert/UP/MS techs if change was made...just their title down to Origin of Existence if beyond that...and refund, as less people involved. But down to AG...way to screw things up majorly.
I will never understand why admin added ascensions after 20th...also considering it's among worst ascension levels names beyond Origin of Existence..
But well, I really hope he never touches 11 to 20th ascensions. Those were the logical adds.
[/spoiler]I never said anything about resetting the account. I was talking about simply giving them the resources back they spent on the ascension, and putting their title back to AG. Sometimes cuts need to be made, for the benefit of a game. Especially if the game never resets.
Do you not think this could possibly put thebiggest UnKnowns even further ahead? Getting all the naq and UU they spent on ascensions 10 - 23 back would give us a lot more 600mill + army sizes and covert 38 wouldn't be out of reach.
It would be no different to if someone had decided to exactly that in stead of ascend wouldn't it?
Yes it would make a difference, think about it..... if I was given all those uu back that i lost during ascensions i'd be on like 700m army, would I be anywhere near 700m army if I had not ascended and lost those uu? No.
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 3:00 am
by ~Coyle~
25th ascension title is the Wizzard
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 3:36 am
by Duderanch
~Coyle~ wrote:25th ascension title is the Wizzard
I thought it was 'flying spaghetti monster'.
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 3:46 am
by LegendaryA
24th is Eternal Supreme God of the Unknown Gods of the ¤¤¤
25th is Creator of the Universes of the ¤¤¤
26th is Mario Bros of the ¤¤¤
27th is Super Mario Bros of the ¤¤¤
28th is Bruce Lee of the ¤¤¤
29th is Ascended Bruce Lee of the ¤¤¤
30th is Shiney Mew of the ¤¤¤

Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:17 am
by ~Coyle~
I think we should get a pool going and see who gets it right
I wouldnt be surprised if the 25th one was named 'Jason'

Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:57 am
by RoKeT
Lol I want
24th to be
Creator of The Universe
and 25th to be
Creator of Everything
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:10 am
by Sarevok
Clarkey wrote:[spoiler]
Sarevok wrote:Duderanch wrote:Sarevok wrote:LegendaryA wrote:Sarevok wrote:LegendaryA wrote:Sarevok wrote:Z E R O wrote:I think somewhere I heard that 24 and 25 would never be released... does anyone know if that's true?
I seriously hope NOT! Going to 23 already ruined parts of the game (aka taking losses of some form, being blessed more then not being blessed)
If anything, refund everyone that ascended the ascension requirements, and go back to the maximum of 10 ascensions...
Maximum 20 then..NO WAY I downgrade from AGoL!

(moreover, le the worst names of ascension levels are found after Origin of Existence..)
You know i said you'd get refunded for every ascension you have made?
I didn't spend all those ressources and time to go back to yuckish LG title (even AG wouldn't really satisfy me for reason I will tell).
Refund wouldn't change much if it was down to AG (I mean, it would have been quite a waste of time for all). Moreover, in my option, less people would be concerned, and they would loose less if it was down to 20th (23rd to 20th is less issues than 23rd to 10th) not to mention the MASSIVE amount of reversed-to-AG people if it was down to 10. Seriously if ALL people from EAG to Unknown get reversed to AG...that would be ridiculous. Not to mention all the cool names being gone.
People shouldn't lose their covert/UP/MS techs if change was made...just their title down to Origin of Existence if beyond that...and refund, as less people involved. But down to AG...way to screw things up majorly.
I will never understand why admin added ascensions after 20th...also considering it's among worst ascension levels names beyond Origin of Existence..
But well, I really hope he never touches 11 to 20th ascensions. Those were the logical adds.
I never said anything about resetting the account. I was talking about simply giving them the resources back they spent on the ascension, and putting their title back to AG. Sometimes cuts need to be made, for the benefit of a game. Especially if the game never resets.
Do you not think this could possibly put thebiggest UnKnowns even further ahead? Getting all the naq and UU they spent on ascensions 10 - 23 back would give us a lot more 600mill + army sizes and covert 38 wouldn't be out of reach.
It would be no different to if someone had decided to exactly that in stead of ascend wouldn't it?
[/spoiler]Yes it would make a difference, think about it..... if I was given all those uu back that i lost during ascensions i'd be on like 700m army, would I be anywhere near 700m army if I had not ascended and lost those uu? No.
And would you maintain anywhere near that if there was an exponential plague rate? No.
-Edit-
But I guess if you are currently at 460m+ and have finished all the ascensions, you would get to that point. But no one would be able to sustain themselves that high. Training them all to miners would loose you 20m. To protect that income you'd need a defence like C2's. Once that got massed, you'd be back to 450m army size, which is where you would have been before the reset anyway.
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:01 am
by Clarkey
Sarevok wrote:But I guess if you are currently at 460m+ and have finished all the ascensions, you would get to that point. But no one would be able to sustain themselves that high. Training them all to miners would loose you 20m. To protect that income you'd need a defence like C2's. Once that got massed, you'd be back to 450m army size, which is where you would have been before the reset anyway.
Please make sense of what you are saying here as I do not follow.
Why would I want the uu refund putting me up to 700m army just to then get a huge plague loss of 1.68m a day and get constantly targetted by people? If I had never ascended past AG then I would never have reached 700m.
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:08 am
by Chronus
23 is enough
perhaps another thing for the higher players to shoot like have more than one mothership or making support ships after reaching Unknown.
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:20 am
by Clarkey
There is no need for further ascensions and there is no need for additional special things for anyone that has reached #23.
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:23 am
by RoKeT
Like I said before I think 24 and 25 should be an option, but instead of blessings make a cosmetic change that way it doesn't help you but us players who are Unknown can decide if we want to continue and it allows the smaller players to build back up even though it hurts us, get it?
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:26 am
by GOLDEN WING
cosmetic + better names original creative names xD
also give weps more efficiency or lower repair cost for weps lost etc.
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 3:23 pm
by LegendaryA
I think there's already enough ascensions...there's even more than there should be (20) so let's not add more.
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:13 pm
by Sarevok
Clarkey wrote:Sarevok wrote:But I guess if you are currently at 460m+ and have finished all the ascensions, you would get to that point. But no one would be able to sustain themselves that high. Training them all to miners would loose you 20m. To protect that income you'd need a defence like C2's. Once that got massed, you'd be back to 450m army size, which is where you would have been before the reset anyway.
Please make sense of what you are saying here as I do not follow.
More aimed at what i thought you were saying about it being a massive advantage. But as you explained later, it isn't.
GOLDEN WING wrote:also give weps more efficiency or lower repair cost for weps lost etc.
That would only increase the power different, and make new people even less competitive.
Re: New Ascended Icon - 24/25?
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 2:42 am
by Field Marshall
lol, well whether we like it or not...there are going to be 2 more ascensions, you have all kinda gone off topic. All I wanted to know was WHEN and not whether we should have additional motherships xD
So bascially - nobody knows
