Page 3 of 4
Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:04 am
by Reschef
Wepwaet wrote:Yoyo had less than 2t, closer to 1t from planets. He was in Mayhem when he built them(defenses) remember, we know.

well, all I remember is that all his planets gave him at least 200 bil defense (some of them even deff+??? duals). maybe it were not 10 planets so it was less planet bonus. doesn't matter much anyway

Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:16 am
by dresnov
If you can build a 110t def..i can build a strike to mass it...you just have to have the balls..brains...and will power.
To be honest if i had a better account..or even with the one i have now and you declared a 1v1 against me..i would with no doubt in my mind...ask ALL my mates for lend of resources..give my mates in RL that play drink and smokes etc for resources.I know a fair amount of peeps ingame and I am good mates with all so i would build up a fair amount of naq and uu.
Also if i told them what its for some would just even sponsor me
The point is even tho its 1 v 1 i would use up all my contacts and run a huge tab but at least i can tell myself...at least i tried.Might make me a **Filtered** or whatever but thats how id try and deal with your def.
Everyone tells themselves ..'I cant mass that def' from the start...but youd be suprised what you can do.
Even if my account would be wreked after it..nowadays its sooo easy to rebuild back up.
Or..spend like 200$..wait til i know your defo not online and wont be for awhile....and mass mass mass.
Praise the lord that will never happen...mainly cause i dont have 200$

and if i did i would like to spend it on other things.
Also fair play on building such a nice def.
ARRRRRR
Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:02 am
by Field Marshall
I completely agree with Dresnov. The matter of fact is...it CAN be massed. It's not impossible, agreed extremely difficult.
I am from the old skool and believe that a challenge should be met, as best you can - I would commit the rest of my days here to see it's removal. You pretty much get one shot at it, get lucky and you will be forever known as the person that took the highest defence at this moment in time.
C2 has constantly pointed out that those that currently have outstanding vendettas should team up - I bet they're not talking

Come on, how many people are fearing you now C2? Half the server? Bah - like Dresnov said, go round and collect some sponsorship, it can be done secretly....
Complaining that it's impossible shouldn't even come into the equation...
Sorry if I offend anybody with this...just saying how it seems

Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:12 am
by RepliMagni
C2 without his def should be much more feared

Those with a brain will figure out why.....long may he keep his def

Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:17 am
by caesar2
RepliMagni wrote:C2 without his def should be much more feared

Those with a brain will figure out why.....long may he keep his def


Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:22 am
by Kjarkur
RepliMagni wrote:C2 without his def should be much more feared

Those with a brain will figure out why.....long may he keep his def

Exactly.
Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:21 am
by shooty08
caesar2 wrote:Also, like i said, i know many cant mass me, but why are ppl writing posts in my vendeta topics and telling I have no honor? To not build stats before was dishonorable, to build stats now is dishonorable. So what is honorable?
Honor is internal. As long as you keep to your own code of honor, others should be able to see that you are an honorable person.
The problem comes when people try to judge others based on their own code. I personally wouldn't spend that much money on a game because I consider it to be gain that didn't come from my own effort. I don't hold it against you, but I wouldn't do that.
Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:07 pm
by Empy
caesar2 wrote:Empy, you cant compare this game case with RL. USA will never declare war with Slovakia, cuse we dont have gas, petrol or diamonds. We have only lot of water, and US busines men here are very polite and mature. Also we are a part of the same coalition,, called NATO. Why should they declare war on allyes? Nvm, lets talk in bigger numbers. What would happen if USA decl;ares war on Germany? France? UK? The same case as with Slovakia, cuse those mentioned states dont have enough (or have 0) nuclear weapons or another tactical weapons. What would happen if China will declare war on Europe? Same scenario, cuse China have enough nuclear weapons and huge human potential. But many economics in world will fall, which will afect whole world. Please, dont compare RL situations with the game. You have maybe no idea what are you talking about. Buy Kisinger's book or Huntington's Clash of civilizations.
I think you missed the point of the metaphor, obviously the US would not declare war on Slovakia. Neither would they declare war on anyone else in NATO or the UN, it was simply an example since the US has the largest military in the world (based on spending) and you're from Slovakia and I assume
comparatively it has a rather small military.
Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:23 pm
by caesar2
Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:caesar2 wrote:Empy, you cant compare this game case with RL. USA will never declare war with Slovakia, cuse we dont have gas, petrol or diamonds. We have only lot of water, and US busines men here are very polite and mature. Also we are a part of the same coalition,, called NATO. Why should they declare war on allyes? Nvm, lets talk in bigger numbers. What would happen if USA decl;ares war on Germany? France? UK? The same case as with Slovakia, cuse those mentioned states dont have enough (or have 0) nuclear weapons or another tactical weapons. What would happen if China will declare war on Europe? Same scenario, cuse China have enough nuclear weapons and huge human potential. But many economics in world will fall, which will afect whole world. Please, dont compare RL situations with the game. You have maybe no idea what are you talking about. Buy Kisinger's book or Huntington's Clash of civilizations.
I think you missed the point of the metaphor, obviously the US would not declare war on Slovakia. Neither would they declare war on anyone else in NATO or the UN, it was simply an example since the US has the largest military in the world (based on spending) and you're from Slovakia and I assume
comparatively it has a rather small military.
Well, why do you think US have largest military in the world?
Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:42 pm
by Guild
to compensate for something hehheh sorry couldnt help it
each to his own C2

Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:45 pm
by Empy
caesar2 wrote:Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:caesar2 wrote:Empy, you cant compare this game case with RL. USA will never declare war with Slovakia, cuse we dont have gas, petrol or diamonds. We have only lot of water, and US busines men here are very polite and mature. Also we are a part of the same coalition,, called NATO. Why should they declare war on allyes? Nvm, lets talk in bigger numbers. What would happen if USA decl;ares war on Germany? France? UK? The same case as with Slovakia, cuse those mentioned states dont have enough (or have 0) nuclear weapons or another tactical weapons. What would happen if China will declare war on Europe? Same scenario, cuse China have enough nuclear weapons and huge human potential. But many economics in world will fall, which will afect whole world. Please, dont compare RL situations with the game. You have maybe no idea what are you talking about. Buy Kisinger's book or Huntington's Clash of civilizations.
I think you missed the point of the metaphor, obviously the US would not declare war on Slovakia. Neither would they declare war on anyone else in NATO or the UN, it was simply an example since the US has the largest military in the world (based on spending) and you're from Slovakia and I assume
comparatively it has a rather small military.
Well, why do you think US have largest military in the world?
I just said, because they spend the most money on it.
Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:02 pm
by caesar2
Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:caesar2 wrote:Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:caesar2 wrote:Empy, you cant compare this game case with RL. USA will never declare war with Slovakia, cuse we dont have gas, petrol or diamonds. We have only lot of water, and US busines men here are very polite and mature. Also we are a part of the same coalition,, called NATO. Why should they declare war on allyes? Nvm, lets talk in bigger numbers. What would happen if USA decl;ares war on Germany? France? UK? The same case as with Slovakia, cuse those mentioned states dont have enough (or have 0) nuclear weapons or another tactical weapons. What would happen if China will declare war on Europe? Same scenario, cuse China have enough nuclear weapons and huge human potential. But many economics in world will fall, which will afect whole world. Please, dont compare RL situations with the game. You have maybe no idea what are you talking about. Buy Kisinger's book or Huntington's Clash of civilizations.
I think you missed the point of the metaphor, obviously the US would not declare war on Slovakia. Neither would they declare war on anyone else in NATO or the UN, it was simply an example since the US has the largest military in the world (based on spending) and you're from Slovakia and I assume
comparatively it has a rather small military.
Well, why do you think US have largest military in the world?
I just said, because they spend the most money on it.
Exactly, they spend most money, but it doesnt mean they have largets military. Well but they have nuclear weapons

only Russia, China and few small countrys with few nuclears can compare with this. The rest of world can pray they wont fight each other

Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:03 pm
by Guild
and the UK

but we are smart and dont have them onland

Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:05 pm
by caesar2
Guild wrote:and the UK

but we are smart and dont have them onland

UK has nuclear weapons but is not comperable with US, russia or china. they can send few nuclears, but can destroy whole country, US or russia can destroy whole world more times

Re: So what?
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:06 pm
by Empy
caesar2 wrote:Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:caesar2 wrote:Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:caesar2 wrote:Empy, you cant compare this game case with RL. USA will never declare war with Slovakia, cuse we dont have gas, petrol or diamonds. We have only lot of water, and US busines men here are very polite and mature. Also we are a part of the same coalition,, called NATO. Why should they declare war on allyes? Nvm, lets talk in bigger numbers. What would happen if USA decl;ares war on Germany? France? UK? The same case as with Slovakia, cuse those mentioned states dont have enough (or have 0) nuclear weapons or another tactical weapons. What would happen if China will declare war on Europe? Same scenario, cuse China have enough nuclear weapons and huge human potential. But many economics in world will fall, which will afect whole world. Please, dont compare RL situations with the game. You have maybe no idea what are you talking about. Buy Kisinger's book or Huntington's Clash of civilizations.
I think you missed the point of the metaphor, obviously the US would not declare war on Slovakia. Neither would they declare war on anyone else in NATO or the UN, it was simply an example since the US has the largest military in the world (based on spending) and you're from Slovakia and I assume
comparatively it has a rather small military.
Well, why do you think US have largest military in the world?
I just said, because they spend the most money on it.
Exactly, they spend most money, but it doesnt mean they have largets military. Well but they have nuclear weapons

only Russia, China and few small countrys with few nuclears can compare with this. The rest of world can pray they wont fight each other

Oh, well I'm fairly sure they do regardless. Perhaps not the most soldiers but definitely the most well-equipped military in the world. It matters not though! Simply a metaphor which you then used against me again.
My point was it frustrates people that they can't do anything to you but you're free to do whatever. As the point has been made though I suppose 1 extremely determined person could do it, but not many alone could. Would take you being at war with an alliance.