Page 3 of 10

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:28 am
by xDaku
You know something's true when Juliette and I both agree for once :razz:

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:31 am
by Ercury
Sabbing strike weapons
Keep rebuilding defence

Keep massing him
Farm every 30 min

Mass planet defences


Their allot of options to keep one down is by making sure he has to keep throwing hes naq at repairs and rebuying hes strike weapon.

:)

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:35 am
by Juliette
Ercury wrote:Sabbing strike weapons
Keep rebuilding defence

Keep massing him
Farm every 30 min

Mass planet defences


Their allot of options to keep one down is by making sure he has to keep throwing hes naq at repairs and rebuying hes strike weapon.

:)
Those are some of the options available, indeed. If you want to keep throwing 'limitless' naq at it yourself as well.. ;)
You cannot have that kind of resolve though. (And if you -guys- can now, I wonder why you couldn't in our earlier wars.)

:?

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:40 am
by Bromas
~Vix~ wrote:Accepted.
The terms, no way. Officers will be sat on. Infact, imma just do whatever the **Filtered** i want :D

Okay then, I'm coming for you, your officers (If you have any) and your CO (If you have one)

Guild wrote:does this mean ill have to be andys officer so i can kick someones ass that has come back just to cause trouble... ?

let me know if thats the case so i can join him.

I'm sure I can fight on my own buddy. But I would welcome the extra UP.

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:42 am
by Ercury
Juliette wrote:
Ercury wrote:Sabbing strike weapons
Keep rebuilding defence

Keep massing him
Farm every 30 min

Mass planet defences


Their allot of options to keep one down is by making sure he has to keep throwing hes naq at repairs and rebuying hes strike weapon.

:)
Those are some of the options available, indeed. If you want to keep throwing 'limitless' naq at it yourself as well.. ;)
You cannot have that kind of resolve though. (And if you -guys- can now, I wonder why you couldn't in our earlier wars.)

:?


Those were just examples I threw. rebuilding defences over and over again is a good thing.

Yea u lose the defence , but the masser also has to put effort and recources in it :)

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:44 am
by ~Kronos~
Andy! wrote:
~Vix~ wrote:Accepted.
The terms, no way. Officers will be sat on. Infact, imma just do whatever the **Filtered** i want :D

Okay then, I'm coming for you, your officers (If you have any) and your CO (If you have one)

Guild wrote:does this mean ill have to be andys officer so i can kick someones ass that has come back just to cause trouble... ?

let me know if thats the case so i can join him.

I'm sure I can fight on my own buddy. But I would welcome the extra UP.


Don't forget I'm gunning for him too :twisted:

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:49 am
by Juliette
Andy! wrote:
~Vix~ wrote:Accepted.
The terms, no way. Officers will be sat on. Infact, imma just do whatever the **Filtered** i want :D
Okay then, I'm coming for you, your officers (If you have any) and your CO (If you have one)
Ah-ha! I'll see you on the battlefield then, padawan. Interesting choice. ;)

Ercury wrote:
Juliette wrote:Those are some of the options available, indeed. If you want to keep throwing 'limitless' naq at it yourself as well.. ;)
You cannot have that kind of resolve though.
Those were just examples I threw. rebuilding defences over and over again is a good thing.
Yea u lose the defence , but the masser also has to put effort and recources in it :)
Fair enough. :) Can be done, indeed.. whether it should be done is another question entirely. :P

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:55 am
by ~Drunken Master~
Juliette wrote:(Back again, after the forum banned me.. *growls*)


Andy, you cannot dictate terms when you're the aggressor. And you are, in this vendetta. Sure, Vix attacked (no, he didn't) a few people here and there, but that's not part of this vendetta that you declared. What makes this even more ironic is the fact that now, your alliance is in a bind.
Wolfstein, for example, is an officer of Andy's. Generations does not want one of their members massed. Vix doesn't care whether he gets massed. If Generations masses Vix, they make themselves a target, and achieve nothing (since Vix couldn't care less; "hey, what the hell, more farms").

So, long story short, you shouldn't have declared a public vendetta. Should've put him on the hitlist or something. :P (If anything would have to be done at all.)




In the end, Vix will have a blast, regardless of (or maybe because of) the 'return fire' he gets, he'll have a laugh and a mass, cares nothing about losing his stats, and will achieve whatever he wants. If anything, Vix knows how to set realistic targets. You're screwed. Looking forward to seeing what you'll do to counter this. :D


Your a complete disappointment . .. .

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:55 am
by ~Drunken Master~
Go ANdy Go..

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:56 am
by Bromas
~BrunoDaOzzy~ wrote:
Juliette wrote:(Back again, after the forum banned me.. *growls*)


Andy, you cannot dictate terms when you're the aggressor. And you are, in this vendetta. Sure, Vix attacked (no, he didn't) a few people here and there, but that's not part of this vendetta that you declared. What makes this even more ironic is the fact that now, your alliance is in a bind.
Wolfstein, for example, is an officer of Andy's. Generations does not want one of their members massed. Vix doesn't care whether he gets massed. If Generations masses Vix, they make themselves a target, and achieve nothing (since Vix couldn't care less; "hey, what the hell, more farms").

So, long story short, you shouldn't have declared a public vendetta. Should've put him on the hitlist or something. :P (If anything would have to be done at all.)




In the end, Vix will have a blast, regardless of (or maybe because of) the 'return fire' he gets, he'll have a laugh and a mass, cares nothing about losing his stats, and will achieve whatever he wants. If anything, Vix knows how to set realistic targets. You're screwed. Looking forward to seeing what you'll do to counter this. :D


Your a complete disappointment . .. .

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:57 am
by RoKeT
Was gonna say go both but it would seem you have issues with FS members Andy! **Filtered** ya ;)

Vix show this kid how it is to mass nothing but respect you were the first to spank me I know you can mass have fun :)

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:00 am
by ~Drunken Master~
RoKeT wrote:Was gonna say go both but it would seem you have issues with FS members Andy! **Filtered** ya ;)

Vix show this kid how it is to mass nothing but respect you were the first to spank me I know you can mass have fun :)


](*,)

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:01 am
by Bromas
RoKeT wrote:Was gonna say go both but it would seem you have issues with FS members Andy! **Filtered** ya ;)

Vix show this kid how it is to mass nothing but respect you were the first to spank me I know you can mass have fun :)

**Filtered**, I thought we where friends :(

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:18 am
by [BoT] Jason
Grammar Nazi Jason's eyes bleed when he reads this


Don't be hating Jules cause your boy Andy here made bad decisions... Go Vix!

Re: ~Vix~ Vs Andy

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:24 am
by ~Drunken Master~
Go Andy Go :smt060