I see no problem with this. The rules say no sharing accounts - they did NOT share it. At no point did they both login - Bruno gave it to another player, who has since decided to give it him back.
Now can it be viewed as babysitting? Yes, but the time period is sufficiently large enough, and the instance sufficiently unique enough, that we're not talking about two people passing a c.40 account back and forth every 12 hrs so someone is always online - THAT is what the rule is intended to stop.
~BrunoDaOzzy~
-
RepliMagni
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:29 am
- Alliance: Loner :P
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 1908448
-
Mathlord
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8920
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:56 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- Race: Tollan
- ID: 12759
- Location: On the Edge of the Unknown
- Contact:
Re: ~BrunoDaOzzy~
Besides, if memory serves, people have gotten babysitters for their accounts before with admin approval...
Case in point...
[spoiler]
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=139824&start=26
So it would be a bit difficult to start a precedent now...
Case in point...
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Severian wrote:Oh my kitty kat. So calling people up and getting them to bank for you wasn't cheating? You've been dirty from the start and your alliance has a lot of dirty secrets...
If they don't play the game it is legal..you think I didn't ask admin that? And btw haven't u surrendered?
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=139824&start=26
So it would be a bit difficult to start a precedent now...
Spoiler
13:38 General Zeus Sabotage Repelled 377,977,330 details
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 305,393,963,879,000 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 4,635,986 of Mathlord's troops.
---
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 12 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 0 of Mathlord's troops.