Page 3 of 3

Re: ~BrunoDaOzzy~

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:18 am
by RepliMagni
I see no problem with this. The rules say no sharing accounts - they did NOT share it. At no point did they both login - Bruno gave it to another player, who has since decided to give it him back.

Now can it be viewed as babysitting? Yes, but the time period is sufficiently large enough, and the instance sufficiently unique enough, that we're not talking about two people passing a c.40 account back and forth every 12 hrs so someone is always online - THAT is what the rule is intended to stop.

Re: ~BrunoDaOzzy~

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:12 pm
by Mathlord
Besides, if memory serves, people have gotten babysitters for their accounts before with admin approval...

Case in point...

[spoiler]
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
Severian wrote:Oh my kitty kat. So calling people up and getting them to bank for you wasn't cheating? You've been dirty from the start and your alliance has a lot of dirty secrets...


If they don't play the game it is legal..you think I didn't ask admin that? And btw haven't u surrendered?
[/spoiler]

viewtopic.php?f=101&t=139824&start=26

So it would be a bit difficult to start a precedent now...