Page 3 of 4
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:06 pm
by HippyFool
Forum wrote:always one raid slave missing -- probably he got stuck on the lid and you never noticed him when throwing the jar out
Happens to everyone so more amusing than harmful! 
alliance limit - found and fixed the issue (was sneaky...)
Yay!raid % was 50-100% of .1% of available per turn used. It is now 85-100% of .1% of available per turn used.
Thankyou. That is a much better range. I am happy I at least worked out is was based off of .1% 
still going to check the battlelog and attacklog reports of numbers versus actual. (if someone can provide a battleid where it is off....)
still going to check the officer commander numbers. (again IDs I can play with...)
still going to check the losses in AC (battleid would help, as well as how off you think the numbers are...)
Officer/Commander numbers are the same as always. People should know that it is never really worth having officers unless you have AT LEAST 4 or 5. You shouldn't change this now as the few people with lots of officers will suddenly get a MASSIVE boost. If you want to change those numbers you should do it at the start of next wave.
As for AC losses in battle, they are still a big problem. You wont be able to get any good battle reports this early in the era though. the AC/defense problem arises when the numbers get bigger and people actually have things to lose (last month or so of the era).
To give you an idea of how bad it was the last 2 eras though: If you had an attack about half or more of their defense and an AC higher than their cov, you could take out a large chunk of spies ( if they had 10m spies, perhaps 300-400k spies?), and lose only maybe 3000 or less AC units. ]
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
All in all this era is going pretty well though. Good job
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 2:16 pm
by Forum
it now takes a minimum of 1 spy-killer to destroy 10 spies.
so if 300,000 spies are destroyed, it will take at least 30,000 spy-killers....
otherwise it works as it did before -but this is now the minimum ...
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 6:04 pm
by Jimbo 5.3
In the detailed attack logs it still doesn't say how many spy killers are brought into battle by those attacking me, and the game still says "Putting down the chronicled battle report, you cross reference and call for the corrosponding military armory reports to see the state of your weapons after such a battle...
No weapons to report on. You make a mental note to talk strategy with your attacking commanders..."
even though it said above "Jimbo 5point3 resisted the aggressors with:
No Human Form Defender and 1 Defense Spider
Careful and thourough observation records that the army carried the following arsenal:
1 Defense Spider have Bio Targeting Swarm" (which I did have)
My ID is 30227.
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:51 am
by Quina Quen
Some sort of covert bug?
Covert Mission Report
THIS IS NOT YOUR REPORT!!
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 12:50 pm
by Abhi
General Riviera wrote:Some sort of covert bug?
Covert Mission Report
THIS IS NOT YOUR REPORT!!
That means that the person has been sabotaged to the max limit. No one else can sab him till the next turn or later
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 12:59 pm
by Quina Quen
Oh! Poor Kikaz!
Thanks Abhi. First time I've ever seen that.
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:39 am
by [BoT] Jason
General Riviera wrote:Oh! Poor Kikaz!
Thanks Abhi. First time I've ever seen that.
Probably done on purpose by an alliance mate, good tactic
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 3:25 am
by Quina Quen
No, he was massed and also looks to have been sabbed repeatedly.
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:59 am
by Scenester
[BoT] Jason wrote:General Riviera wrote:Oh! Poor Kikaz!
Thanks Abhi. First time I've ever seen that.
Probably done on purpose by an alliance mate, good tactic
You mean a gay tactic.
I pleaded for removal of this **Filtered** 2 era's ago, everyone does it in the last few hours of an era end making them invulnerable to sabbing.
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:21 am
by ™THE_LEGEND™
You mean a gay tactic.
I pleaded for removal of this **Filtered** 2 era's ago, everyone does it in the last few hours of an era end making them invulnerable to sabbing.[/quote]
Agreed Scenester, Alot of people got lucky last era forsure because I went to mass/sab them cause I had 100 Covert capacity left but kept getting these stupid messages. It is an abused tactic.
New Bug
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:44 pm
by Retribution
I just noticed that if you click to see the Members of the Chickens alliance, it doesn't list Hippy, even though he is obviously the leader of the Alliance.
http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/allianc ... php?id=431
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:09 pm
by Jimbo 5.3
when I type "Hippyfool" into the "search by username" box in the attack screen it comes up with no one. Vacation mode, maybe?
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:29 pm
by Retribution
Jimbo 5.3 wrote:when I type "Hippyfool" into the "search by username" box in the attack screen it comes up with no one. Vacation mode, maybe?
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:34 pm
by HippyFool
I got autobanned about 24 hours ago. I am not sure why? Would make more sense for one of the people getting fed like a fat man eating cookies to have been banned if you ask me.
Anyway, it should be fixed when admin checks his emails! - If someone can see a sign that I have cheated this wave please let me know!!!
Also, can someone tell me my current army size/how much naq I have out ... I am gonna be annoyed if my account hasn't been generating this past day!
*You should be able to find my account my either putting my ID into the web address (14852) or clicking on my name if I have ever sent you an ingame message*
Re: Bugs Era 29
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:35 pm
by Jimbo 5.3
Retribution wrote:Jimbo 5.3 wrote:when I type "Hippyfool" into the "search by username" box in the attack screen it comes up with no one. Vacation mode, maybe?
I still get nothing