Page 3 of 3

Re: population size is greater

Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:53 am
by Huxley
Kikaz wrote:
Huxley wrote:
General Riviera wrote:It's alright when you've got a disposable income higher than your common sense to age ratio.


lmao, too true.

He depends 100% on $ spending, shame, still, fun to watch him waste it.

lmao.

I've spent $150 on turns since November 1st..

But believe what you want. #-o


Kikaz wrote:
Huxley wrote:
General Riviera wrote:It's alright when you've got a disposable income higher than your common sense to age ratio.


lmao, too true.

He depends 100% on $ spending, shame, still, fun to watch him waste it.

lmao.

I've spent $150 on turns since November 1st..

But believe what you want. #-o


Of course, so that 1hour PPT you where on just after I massed you (after your little rebuild) and 180T naq magically appeared wasn't black market issued naq/ppt?

I won't even go into how much you spend, because quite frankly it's none of my business and it's your money so spend it how you wish.

Re: population size is greater

Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:56 am
by Dark Hero
Could have just been banked naq?? #-o

Re: population size is greater

Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:56 pm
by Kikaz
I PPTed and unbanked, built up and then dropped PPT.. and started massing, I was only on PPT for a few minutes...

Re: population size is greater

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:17 am
by Huxley
Dark Hero wrote:Could have just been banked naq?? #-o


Kikaz wrote:I PPTed and unbanked, built up and then dropped PPT.. and started massing, I was only on PPT for a few minutes...


More reason to suspect a 1hour PPT was used, only on for a couple of miniutes + the 180T "unbanked" which is conviently the same amount you recieve after purchusing $50 black market naq...

My point is, it is boring to mass someone who has just suffered substantial losses and definatly could not replenish them so quickly without cash injection, to then see them buy it back with $ the next turn, I see no problem in investing in levels; stats on the other hand just seem a little over the top but hey, its on both sides so I can't complain (although I am complaining #-o)

Re: population size is greater

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:39 am
by Loki™
I happen to know that at that time he had an ammount substantially larger than 180t in his bank. If he had a lot more than that why would he feel the need to buy 180t?

Re: population size is greater

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:50 am
by Huxley
Loki™ wrote:I happen to know that at that time he had an ammount substantially larger than 180t in his bank. If he had a lot more than that why would he feel the need to buy 180t?


Good point, the reasoning I can't be sure on - nor did I say I was positively right could just of been coincidence. I can only speculate on his reasons to buy naq off black market:

1) For the 1 hour PPT; to come off quickly conduct a surprise attack - to try trick us into thinking it was a market issued one (48hour). We didn't have much to surprise attack so it was pointless anyway lmao. (You could say, then he could of bought a $10 one, but hey, he has the money why not go big!)

2) To not dig into his savings for his cov 40?

Again, it could be just coincidence... or not. lmao.

Fact: He was on PPT for a few miniutes, I saw 180T unbanked just after he went on PPT (like a black market purchase).

Re: population size is greater

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:19 am
by Kikaz
Huxley wrote:
Loki™ wrote:I happen to know that at that time he had an ammount substantially larger than 180t in his bank. If he had a lot more than that why would he feel the need to buy 180t?


Good point, the reasoning I can't be sure on - nor did I say I was positively right could just of been coincidence. I can only speculate on his reasons to buy naq off black market:

1) For the 1 hour PPT; to come off quickly conduct a surprise attack - to try trick us into thinking it was a market issued one (48hour). We didn't have much to surprise attack so it was pointless anyway lmao. (You could say, then he could of bought a $10 one, but hey, he has the money why not go big!)

2) To not dig into his savings for his cov 40?

Again, it could be just coincidence... or not. lmao.

Fact: He was on PPT for a few miniutes, I saw 180T unbanked just after he went on PPT (like a black market purchase).


Well your full of **Filtered** with your facts, because I really only unbanked 80t NAQ and built a 30t defense.. with about 60t of it.. :roll:

1. Try to trick who? I had 0 stats at the time I did that.. and you were the only one in my logs.. I went PPT for a second so I wouldn't be sniped by you when I was building up.. then I dropped PPT and started massing you.. Besides if I was spending on Black Market I would have bought the 200m UU instead of waiting half a day to make it to trade cap.. >.>

2. Dig into what savings for cov 40? lmao

I haven't been saving for a cov level... but yes I do have a large sum of NAQ banked, enough to buy an AC level or beef up my MS a little if I wanted..

I said I wasn't buying them until Feb. that doesn't mean I'm saving up for it till feb...

I haven't spent cash since half way through Nov. and won't be again until Feb.. for one simple reason, I'm broke, and don't get paid until the 2nd week of January, which with that check im going to pay for stuff in RL...

Next check I might be able to afford some NAQ and start going for 40/40..

Re: population size is greater

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:45 am
by Huxley
"LuLz" :smt050

My word against yours so I won't bover arguing something I have absoutle no evidence of.