Page 3 of 8

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 9:24 am
by Guild
Cersei Lannister wrote:How terribly dull.

Let us all whine about admin doing his job, I mean, we whine when we 'think' he does not do his job, so let us whine when he does. ;) It is -as usual- like one big kindergarten in this section.


you like on big kindergarten !! :smt019

muhahaha

does seem dodgey that he hasnt been straigh of banned but then again , a confessed mulit has had jack **Filtered** done to him, so admin isnt enforcing rules, so why should anyone really follow them

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 9:34 am
by Jim
RoKeT wrote:
Jim wrote:Fair play to you. And fair play to admin for handling the issue well.
My guess is some kind of tab mod, duplicate actions across tabs or something of that kind. If it wasnt, and that isnt cheating...can somebody make that mod for me? :smt047

already looking up online how to do it :smt047

hey if Admin has allowed it I'm using it... it will make war's easier too

This issue is admin saying: "Dont do it."

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 9:51 am
by Guild
Jim wrote:
RoKeT wrote:
Jim wrote:Fair play to you. And fair play to admin for handling the issue well.
My guess is some kind of tab mod, duplicate actions across tabs or something of that kind. If it wasnt, and that isnt cheating...can somebody make that mod for me? :smt047

already looking up online how to do it :smt047

hey if Admin has allowed it I'm using it... it will make war's easier too

This issue is admin saying: "Dont do it."


yeah but since ice hasnt been banned there is no risk in it, just if you get caught then you get some stuff taken of no biggie right

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 10:01 am
by Jim
No. The reason Icebreaker wasn't banned is because there was no previous precedent. However, I believe admin will be adding it in the rules and will ban people for it from now on.
That's my assumption anyway, and I aint gunna risk it!

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 10:37 am
by Juliette
Jim wrote:No. The reason Icebreaker wasn't banned is because there was no previous precedent. However, I believe admin will be adding it in the rules and will ban people for it from now on.
That's my assumption anyway, and I aint gunna risk it!
Exactly. ;)

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 12:08 pm
by jedi~tank
Cersei Lannister wrote:How terribly dull.

Let us all whine about admin doing his job, I mean, we whine when we 'think' he does not do his job, so let us whine when he does. ;) It is -as usual- like one big kindergarten in this section.

Sorry I don't see any whining, I see an oppurtunity to express opinions on a scenario via the platform ice provided.

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 12:17 pm
by Juliette
Jedi~Tank wrote:Sorry I don't see any whining, I see an oppurtunity to express opinions on a scenario via the platform ice provided.
To each their own opinions, of course. ;)

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 12:19 pm
by xDaku
Cersei Lannister wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:Sorry I don't see any whining, I see an oppurtunity to express opinions on a scenario via the platform ice provided.
To each their own opinions, of course. ;)


That opinion should atleast remotely be connected to Ice's actions, rather than the actions of the users commenting on his actions.

I'm sure you see the difference. :)

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 2:45 pm
by R8
yes that 36 quad would have been eventually scooped up by someone else but it does have an impact on the whole state of the game, price for naq sellers buyers, rate of turns everything. all the resources related to it.

and no way in hell could you have farmed twice as much as top 3-4 farmers in the game with legit or gray area activity and then be punished with a slap on the wrist. what did admin remove? a few covert levels etc. bs

disappointed by this big time

another one in a long line so what else is new

](*,)

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 3:12 pm
by Bromas
[00:10:11] <Andy> viewtopic.php?f=209&t=192360 so he did script?
[00:10:28] <~adminHere> who?
[00:10:49] <Andy> Ice
[00:11:00] <~adminHere> the issue is 'what is a script'
[00:11:05] <~adminHere> is a browser plugin a script?
[00:11:12] <~adminHere> since its part of the browser...
[00:11:23] <~adminHere> opera has 'auto refresh' - script?

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 3:45 pm
by Guild
nah its a bad call from admin, ice took the naq from the community of people who farm for there naq, and made it available to people who buy a lot with $, discriminating more so against people who cant afford to buy naq.

poor call ice should have been banned clear cut. no doubt

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 3:48 pm
by Guild
Eärendil wrote:
Guild wrote:nah its a bad call from admin, ice took the naq from the community of people who farm for there naq, and made it available to people who buy a lot with $, discriminating more so against people who cant afford to buy naq.

poor call ice should have been banned clear cut. no doubt


For using a resource than many others use? but just for another use.


for takin the naq, in a script like fashion errr YEAH

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:16 pm
by xDaku
Eärendil wrote:
Guild wrote:
Eärendil wrote:
Guild wrote:nah its a bad call from admin, ice took the naq from the community of people who farm for there naq, and made it available to people who buy a lot with $, discriminating more so against people who cant afford to buy naq.

poor call ice should have been banned clear cut. no doubt


For using a resource than many others use? but just for another use.


for takin the naq, in a script like fashion errr YEAH


Lols, there always has been and always will be sellers for $. Ice just found a way to help maximize profits.


Doesn't make what he did right.

Auto refresh does not interfere with the gameplay of others. What he used, does. That makes a big difference, and ignoring that for literal values is ignorance at best.

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 9:14 pm
by Borek
Sorry but auto-refresh does not farm naq for you, bank it, repair your defense weapons, now maybe he used various browser tools in a combination of windows and tabs to duplicate the effect of a script, but really, what is the difference?

People should be looking at the end result, not the exact method being used.

2) No automated processes, macros, scripts or other 'non human being' run account activity is allowed.

To me that is quite clear, rule 2 was not just broken, it was smashed to pieces and raped for personal profit.

Re: IceBreaker Message to GW community - Read

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 9:17 pm
by xXxsephirothxXx
xDaku wrote:
Eärendil wrote:
Guild wrote:
Eärendil wrote:
Guild wrote:nah its a bad call from admin, ice took the naq from the community of people who farm for there naq, and made it available to people who buy a lot with $, discriminating more so against people who cant afford to buy naq.

poor call ice should have been banned clear cut. no doubt


For using a resource than many others use? but just for another use.


for takin the naq, in a script like fashion errr YEAH


Lols, there always has been and always will be sellers for $. Ice just found a way to help maximize profits.


Doesn't make what he did right.

Auto refresh does not interfere with the gameplay of others. What he used, does. That makes a big difference, and ignoring that for literal values is ignorance at best.

Before we continue further with the self righteous ploy... Can you tell me what his Grey advantage did exactrly? or do we all just know that admin made a fence call on right and wrong and made some deductions in fairness?...

Would help to know the exact details instead of twisting the outcome to fit ones personal opinion of what happened?!