StarGateWars Forums

malbrega wrote:and no I didnt buy a uss i just tried to protect my self from blain, whose doing a grand job of setting me up

Jimbo 5.3 wrote:Just an FYI to everyone who is looking for feeding:

I was attacked by blain 10 times today. The result:

blain's naq gained: 0
blain's units lost (exluding defected): Roughly 1800
defected units: Roughly 6000


In otherwords, I GAINED 6000 units from these attacks, while losing 0 turns. For this reason I believe that it is actually possible to be fed this era not only by taking another's naq (through illegitimate ways), but also by being massed by someone else that has an unhappy army and large amounts of untrained units or attacking units (whichever group it is the defects from unhappy armies).

Unfortunately, this method of being fed results in the one receiving the benefits of feeding while losing 0 turns, making it arguably more efficient than "standard" feeding. It is also going to be harder to determine who got fed through this new method vs who was simply massed.


I just hope that I didn't give anyone any ideas about how to feed, but something tells me Kikaz or Akhal are going to dash those hopes...

EDIT: On top of this, I didn't choose to have blain attack me 10 times, whereas with "standard" feeding methods I must choose to spend attack turns to take the naq from my buddy. I (and anyone else) could be looked upon as a feeder simply by having a strong enough defense and happy enough army such that all attacks are stopped while units defect to the defending individual.

Jimbo 5.3 wrote:Just an FYI to everyone who is looking for feeding:

I was attacked by blain 10 times today. The result:

blain's naq gained: 0
blain's units lost (exluding defected): Roughly 1800
defected units: Roughly 6000


In otherwords, I GAINED 6000 units from these attacks, while losing 0 turns. For this reason I believe that it is actually possible to be fed this era not only by taking another's naq (through illegitimate ways), but also by being massed by someone else that has an unhappy army and large amounts of untrained units or attacking units (whichever group it is the defects from unhappy armies).

Unfortunately, this method of being fed results in the one receiving the benefits of feeding while losing 0 turns, making it arguably more efficient than "standard" feeding. It is also going to be harder to determine who got fed through this new method vs who was simply massed.


I just hope that I didn't give anyone any ideas about how to feed, but something tells me Kikaz or Akhal are going to dash those hopes...

EDIT: On top of this, I didn't choose to have blain attack me 10 times, whereas with "standard" feeding methods I must choose to spend attack turns to take the naq from my buddy. I (and anyone else) could be looked upon as a feeder simply by having a strong enough defense and happy enough army such that all attacks are stopped while units defect to the defending individual.

HippyFool wrote:

Jimbo 5.3 wrote:Just an FYI to everyone who is looking for feeding:

I was attacked by blain 10 times today. The result:

blain's naq gained: 0
blain's units lost (exluding defected): Roughly 1800
defected units: Roughly 6000


In otherwords, I GAINED 6000 units from these attacks, while losing 0 turns. For this reason I believe that it is actually possible to be fed this era not only by taking another's naq (through illegitimate ways), but also by being massed by someone else that has an unhappy army and large amounts of untrained units or attacking units (whichever group it is the defects from unhappy armies).

Unfortunately, this method of being fed results in the one receiving the benefits of feeding while losing 0 turns, making it arguably more efficient than "standard" feeding. It is also going to be harder to determine who got fed through this new method vs who was simply massed.


I just hope that I didn't give anyone any ideas about how to feed, but something tells me Kikaz or Akhal are going to dash those hopes...

EDIT: On top of this, I didn't choose to have blain attack me 10 times, whereas with "standard" feeding methods I must choose to spend attack turns to take the naq from my buddy. I (and anyone else) could be looked upon as a feeder simply by having a strong enough defense and happy enough army such that all attacks are stopped while units defect to the defending individual.

I said this on the first day. I just haven't managed to get in touch with admin yet

SÅTÅN 666 wrote:

Jimbo 5.3 wrote:Just an FYI to everyone who is looking for feeding:

I was attacked by blain 10 times today. The result:

blain's naq gained: 0
blain's units lost (exluding defected): Roughly 1800
defected units: Roughly 6000


In otherwords, I GAINED 6000 units from these attacks, while losing 0 turns. For this reason I believe that it is actually possible to be fed this era not only by taking another's naq (through illegitimate ways), but also by being massed by someone else that has an unhappy army and large amounts of untrained units or attacking units (whichever group it is the defects from unhappy armies).

Unfortunately, this method of being fed results in the one receiving the benefits of feeding while losing 0 turns, making it arguably more efficient than "standard" feeding. It is also going to be harder to determine who got fed through this new method vs who was simply massed.


I just hope that I didn't give anyone any ideas about how to feed, but something tells me Kikaz or Akhal are going to dash those hopes...

EDIT: On top of this, I didn't choose to have blain attack me 10 times, whereas with "standard" feeding methods I must choose to spend attack turns to take the naq from my buddy. I (and anyone else) could be looked upon as a feeder simply by having a strong enough defense and happy enough army such that all attacks are stopped while units defect to the defending individual.

Akhal and Kikaz will probably use it now that you told everyone haha...Should have told admin first lol!!

Feri wrote:For the record, I'm not a cheater which abusing that bug would be cheating.
Anyone who cares enough can get in touch with jason easily and report bugs and get them fixed.
Just because you are sore for failing to do the only thing you attempted last era don't try to accuse me of things

Jimbo 5.3 wrote:

Feri wrote:For the record, I'm not a cheater which abusing that bug would be cheating.
Anyone who cares enough can get in touch with jason easily and report bugs and get them fixed.
Just because you are sore for failing to do the only thing you attempted last era don't try to accuse me of things

''Who the heck is Feri? ''

'Akhal got a case of the munchies.''

Scenester wrote:

Jimbo 5.3 wrote:
''Who the heck is Feri? ''

'Akhal got a case of the munchies.''

Feri wrote:For the record, I'm not a cheater which abusing that bug would be cheating.
Anyone who cares enough can get in touch with jason easily and report bugs and get them fixed.
Just because you are sore for failing to do the only thing you attempted last era don't try to accuse me of things

Jimbo 5.3 wrote: I don't know how to get in touch with an admin, otherwise I would.

HippyFool wrote:To talk to admin Jason... go to "(new) chat" in the top left hand corner of the Q page. Then go to the channel called "#theplace" and he will be there called ~admingone ... or something similar.

Only problem is that he almost never responds Fridays are your best bet.

Because he likes counting money more then improving his game

HippyFool wrote:To talk to admin Jason... go to "(new) chat" in the top left hand corner of the Q page. Then go to the channel called "#theplace" and he will be there called ~admingone ... or something similar.

Only problem is that he almost never responds Fridays are your best bet.

Jimbo 5.3 wrote:
Getting back on topic, though:

Feri wrote:For the record, I'm not a cheater which abusing that bug would be cheating.
Anyone who cares enough can get in touch with jason easily and report bugs and get them fixed.
Just because you are sore for failing to do the only thing you attempted last era don't try to accuse me of things