Page 3 of 5

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 4:48 pm
by mephis
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:The terms of the DRA were broken so it matters not if the hit was 2involved days old ir 5stand minutes old tge fact remains...ETL simply stated he will act in kind to the same were given



Yes and i simply stated he was an idiot for going about it, if he had of said next dde to hit oe below the dra would be warned gave a time limit and then massed

rather than brining up a two day old hit.....

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:00 pm
by jedi~tank
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.

Fair enough..however. Why is that you always say the "other party" is "foolish posturing" and your actions are holier than thou [-(

Here is the difference ..I took the request for a DRA to the alliance and we discussed, it then went to a vote. I took it in to stave off a large scale drawn out war which is in the best interest of more then your hide. Your "lot" however tries to get as close as they can to the brink of war by the letter of the "law". DO NOT point your dirty little **Filtered** finger bud, look in the mirror. You mass one of my training alliance mates, and Im on ya ass.

Jedi~Tank
Im just layin it out there
Dont **Filtered** with me and I might not **Filtered** with you

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:02 pm
by mephis
Jedi~Tank wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.

Fair enough..however. Why is that you always say the "other party" is "foolish posturing" and your actions are holier than thou [-(

Here is the difference ..I took the request for a DRA to the alliance and we discussed, it then went to a vote. I took it in to stave off a large scale drawn out war which is in the best interest of more then your hide. Your "lot" however tries to get as close as they can to the brink of war by the letter of the "law". DO NOT point your dirty little **Filtered** finger bud, look in the mirror. You mass one of my training alliance mates, and Im on ya ass.

Jedi~Tank
Im just layin it out there
Dont **Filtered** with me and I might not **Filtered** with you


+1

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:04 pm
by SSG EnterTheLion
mephis wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.


As Per the Red and Bolded Your a god damn idiot, love it if u had an attack that wasnt 2days old?at least rob made this after being online and seeing the hit he posted then and there but whatever ur rebuttle was a complete failure :roll:


Blind as well as pompous! This vendetta is also about a 2 day old attack. And more importantly AFTER the DRA was agreed.

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:06 pm
by jedi~tank
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
mephis wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.


As Per the Red and Bolded Your a god damn idiot, love it if u had an attack that wasnt 2days old?at least rob made this after being online and seeing the hit he posted then and there but whatever ur rebuttle was a complete failure :roll:


Blind as well as pompous! This vendetta is also about a 2 day old attack. And more importantly AFTER the DRA was agreed.

Pompous at times yes, no more or less than anyone else, blind I am not. you say you had a discussion with the person in question, you know as well as I a pm should have been dropped to an HC member.

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:12 pm
by mephis
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
mephis wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.


As Per the Red and Bolded Your a god damn idiot, love it if u had an attack that wasnt 2days old?at least rob made this after being online and seeing the hit he posted then and there but whatever ur rebuttle was a complete failure :roll:


Blind as well as pompous! This vendetta is also about a 2 day old attack. And more importantly AFTER the DRA was agreed.


04:05 Jander 59,901,968,230 Naquadah stolen 15 17,852 95,492 230,345,462,170 3,280,291,794,510

Wed May 23, 2012 8:00 pm
Report this post
Profile Send private message MSNM/WLM


My Logic >Your Powers of observation! Thank You Sheldon Cooper
it seems to me like robert made this thread about 4-5hours attack the attack happend and had pmd Jander the minute it happend as he said in the thread if u bothered to read the whole thing nothing came of it so rob massed him.....

You however got butthurt that rob massed jander and picked an attack that was two days old and threathned a trainee :smt018 lol :roll:

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:13 pm
by SSG EnterTheLion
Jedi~Tank wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.

Fair enough..however. Why is that you always say the "other party" is "foolish posturing" and your actions are holier than thou [-(

Here is the difference ..I took the request for a DRA to the alliance and we discussed, it then went to a vote. I took it in to stave off a large scale drawn out war which is in the best interest of more then your hide. Your "lot" however tries to get as close as they can to the brink of war by the letter of the "law". DO NOT point your dirty little **Filtered** finger bud, look in the mirror. You mass one of my training alliance mates, and Im on ya ass.

Jedi~Tank
Im just layin it out there
Dont **Filtered** with me and I might not **Filtered** with you


Look who's talking! Don't try to act the innocent here. Ever heard that saying what's good for the goose is good for the gander. So don't take the moral high ground with me when it was your foolish alliance mate who thought it would be a good idea to act tough and go around giving 8 hour ultimatums to people who aren't even there.

As I said, if you lot want to play by such methods, we are happy to oblige. So the 8 hour warnings stand!

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:15 pm
by jedi~tank
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.

Fair enough..however. Why is that you always say the "other party" is "foolish posturing" and your actions are holier than thou [-(

Here is the difference ..I took the request for a DRA to the alliance and we discussed, it then went to a vote. I took it in to stave off a large scale drawn out war which is in the best interest of more then your hide. Your "lot" however tries to get as close as they can to the brink of war by the letter of the "law". DO NOT point your dirty little **Filtered** finger bud, look in the mirror. You mass one of my training alliance mates, and Im on ya ass.

Jedi~Tank
Im just layin it out there
Dont **Filtered** with me and I might not **Filtered** with you


Look who's talking! Don't try to act the innocent here. Ever heard that saying what's good for the goose is good for the gander. So don't take the moral high ground with me when it was your foolish alliance mate who thought it would be a good idea to act tough and go around giving 8 hour ultimatums to people who aren't even there.

As I said, if you lot want to play by such methods, we are happy to oblige. So the 8 hour warnings stand!

As I stated, well almost stated..you made a mistake by bypassing HC... :-k where have I seen that act before?

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:16 pm
by SSG EnterTheLion
Jedi~Tank wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
mephis wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.


As Per the Red and Bolded Your a god damn idiot, love it if u had an attack that wasnt 2days old?at least rob made this after being online and seeing the hit he posted then and there but whatever ur rebuttle was a complete failure :roll:


Blind as well as pompous! This vendetta is also about a 2 day old attack. And more importantly AFTER the DRA was agreed.

Pompous at times yes, no more or less than anyone else, blind I am not. you say you had a discussion with the person in question, you know as well as I a pm should have been dropped to an HC member.


He contacted me directly and I told him he would be repaid. In the same manner as I arranged for wolverine to be repaid. And the terms of the DRA don't say anything about HCs..so don't even go there. As long as arrangements are made to be repaid, it's irrelevent.

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:18 pm
by jedi~tank
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
mephis wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.


As Per the Red and Bolded Your a god damn idiot, love it if u had an attack that wasnt 2days old?at least rob made this after being online and seeing the hit he posted then and there but whatever ur rebuttle was a complete failure :roll:


Blind as well as pompous! This vendetta is also about a 2 day old attack. And more importantly AFTER the DRA was agreed.

Pompous at times yes, no more or less than anyone else, blind I am not. you say you had a discussion with the person in question, you know as well as I a pm should have been dropped to an HC member.


He contacted me directly and I told him he would be repaid. In the same manner as I arranged for wolverine to be repaid. And the terms of the DRA don't say anything about HCs..so don't even go there. As long as arrangements are made to be repaid, it's irrelevent.

Does it have to? Seems to me like it would be common courtesy ;) Your attitude will be your continuous undoing. I tried bud :smt102

edit..if HC doesnt know about it then HC cant shout out orders to let it go, or hold off, or dont mass etc etc etc etc

Is this really that complicated?

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:20 pm
by SSG EnterTheLion
Jedi~Tank wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
mephis wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.


As Per the Red and Bolded Your a god damn idiot, love it if u had an attack that wasnt 2days old?at least rob made this after being online and seeing the hit he posted then and there but whatever ur rebuttle was a complete failure :roll:


Blind as well as pompous! This vendetta is also about a 2 day old attack. And more importantly AFTER the DRA was agreed.

Pompous at times yes, no more or less than anyone else, blind I am not. you say you had a discussion with the person in question, you know as well as I a pm should have been dropped to an HC member.


He contacted me directly and I told him he would be repaid. In the same manner as I arranged for wolverine to be repaid. And the terms of the DRA don't say anything about HCs..so don't even go there. As long as arrangements are made to be repaid, it's irrelevent.

Does it have to? Seems to me like it would be common courtesy ;) Your attitude will be your continuous undoing. I tried bud :smt102


Are you looking in the mirror when you're saying that?!

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:21 pm
by jedi~tank
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
mephis wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Enough with this posturing! I had already spoken to the person attacked and informed him to ask jander for repayment and Jander agreed. He just so happened to be indisposed for that day due to work. As many will confirm, he has been a busy boy lately. But if this is how u lot want to play it..


May 23, 14:31 Guild 117,070,333,293 Naquadah stolen 15 45,333 59,168 2,280,125,270,100 4,982,791,860,950 details

I have given guild 8 hours...

I see another attack by a DDE member on HE..when I have the details of that attack, and if it breaches the terms of the DRA, that person will also be given eight hours.

This is what happens when reasonable behaviour is replaced by foolish posturing.


As Per the Red and Bolded Your a god damn idiot, love it if u had an attack that wasnt 2days old?at least rob made this after being online and seeing the hit he posted then and there but whatever ur rebuttle was a complete failure :roll:


Blind as well as pompous! This vendetta is also about a 2 day old attack. And more importantly AFTER the DRA was agreed.

Pompous at times yes, no more or less than anyone else, blind I am not. you say you had a discussion with the person in question, you know as well as I a pm should have been dropped to an HC member.


He contacted me directly and I told him he would be repaid. In the same manner as I arranged for wolverine to be repaid. And the terms of the DRA don't say anything about HCs..so don't even go there. As long as arrangements are made to be repaid, it's irrelevent.

Does it have to? Seems to me like it would be common courtesy ;) Your attitude will be your continuous undoing. I tried bud :smt102


Are you looking in the mirror when you're saying that?!

Every time I have needed I have looked for Rahl or DP on msn..so yes I am.

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:23 pm
by mephis
Love the fact the truth gets ignored :-D guess i can go to bed drunk and happy :-D

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:26 pm
by Massacre
Cats and dogs...fighting like cats...and dogs. Seriously...why dont we just start a team battle for a week or 2 to get ur guys' pent up rage out.

Re: robert vs jander

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:27 pm
by jedi~tank
Massacre wrote:Cats and dogs...fighting like cats...and dogs. Seriously...why dont we just start a team battle for a week or 2 to get ur guys' pent up rage out.

I already asked about that, no reply on it yet.