StarGateWars Forums

WhiteyDude wrote:I know you have, and thank you for sorting things out with me nicely - your alliance member still thinks I'm a multi though...

well, you have had a lot of accusations on you...so you are either extremely unlucky or a cheater and nobody really wants to trust a person who's been called a cheater or believe that you are innocent if they plan on trading with you, once you are called out it doesnt matter if proven to be innocent, you still have that record. For the record though, i dont really give half a damn what you are, unlucky or a cheater, it matters not to me.

xr88 wrote:

WhiteyDude wrote:I know you have, and thank you for sorting things out with me nicely - your alliance member still thinks I'm a multi though...

well, you have had a lot of accusations on you...so you are either extremely unlucky or a cheater and nobody really wants to trust a person who's been called a cheater or believe that you are innocent if they plan on trading with you, once you are called out it doesnt matter if proven to be innocent, you still have that record. For the record though, i dont really give half a damn what you are, unlucky or a cheater, it matters not to me.

If it matters not to you, why are you posting here? .


I do a lot of trading - it's one of the most fun parts of the game in my opinion, and no-one's ever had a problem with me about it .

Also, I'm a mod, and I've been running IRC for over a year - so I'm a highly respected member of the community .



/Whitey

OMG! Whitney you muppet. You started this thread, accusing yourself, and everyone has gone and said you are a cheater.

WhiteyDude wrote:

Sam Fisher wrote:So my alliance member paid you back the naq? I find that hard to believe.

He doesn't believe you general .


I know you have, and thank you for sorting things out with me nicely - your alliance member still thinks I'm a multi though...

/Whitey

Yep sure do.

And I said I found it hard to believe that O’Neill would pay you back, I did not say it was impossible.

Lol ... just because people have accused Whitey of cheating, does not in any which way mean, people will think twice about trading with him XP I have personally traded with him, a few times, and I know him, I would like to think, very well. And Whitey isn't a cheater ... I have known him for over a year now XD

~HellFire

Well even i who was not in the chat for ages now tigergirl.
Its clear as hell that there is no cheating invovled.

I personally dont like such strategies to set others on ppt to hold naq but thats a personal opinion and doesnot change the fact that it is no cheating.

Please people be sure of your case and have better eveidence.

I mean i made the whole wrong treat about three but mistakes happens.

But there was much better logical evidence and not a case that could be cleared bye a simple chat visit or so.

I know myself beign stubborn when i believe something and i dont believe in saying no i know the person he is a friend he wouldnot cheat but this is a matter that is so easily cleared that and solved that it should never become this far. If somebody wouldhave accused me like that i would have lceared it up and then massed the person to hell if no proper apology was given.

amadkiwi wrote:OMG! Whitney you muppet. You started this thread, accusing yourself, and everyone has gone and said you are a cheater.

Read the first post...

Sam Fisher wrote:

WhiteyDude wrote:

Sam Fisher wrote:So my alliance member paid you back the naq? I find that hard to believe.

He doesn't believe you general .


I know you have, and thank you for sorting things out with me nicely - your alliance member still thinks I'm a multi though...

/Whitey

Yep sure do.

And I said I found it hard to believe that O’Neill would pay you back, I did not say it was impossible.

Read TigerGirls post .




/Whitey

ER so WHAT if tiger girl only made an account for her freind to help him out and doesnt intend to play the game just to help out her freind. I think youll find there is nothign in the rules about doing that , although it verges on the edge of multying so i suggest that person doesnt help out the freind i.e giving there res. to him daily, holding stuff on PPT tho is normal game pratise if you can trust someone , so yeah i think ive confused myself enough for oen day within my post.

12agnar0k wrote:ER so WHAT if tiger girl only made an account for her freind to help him out and doesnt intend to play the game just to help out her freind. I think youll find there is nothign in the rules about doing that , although it verges on the edge of multying so i suggest that person doesnt help out the freind i.e giving there res. to him daily, holding stuff on PPT tho is normal game pratise if you can trust someone , so yeah i think ive confused myself enough for oen day within my post.

ot it could come under


'Resource Farms' Limits

It has been noticed that some accounts exist solely to gain resources, in order to sell to other players via paypal or ebay or whatever. This disrupts the balance of the game, goes against the principles of the point of the game, and is no longer going to be allowed.
While the occiasional sale of 'excess' goods is not going to be chased after, any account that is clearly abusing this will be in violation and subject to penalty, suspension or deletion.

RepliJake wrote:

12agnar0k wrote:ER so WHAT if tiger girl only made an account for her freind to help him out and doesnt intend to play the game just to help out her freind. I think youll find there is nothign in the rules about doing that , although it verges on the edge of multying so i suggest that person doesnt help out the freind i.e giving there res. to him daily, holding stuff on PPT tho is normal game pratise if you can trust someone , so yeah i think ive confused myself enough for oen day within my post.

ot it could come under


'Resource Farms' Limits

It has been noticed that some accounts exist solely to gain resources, in order to sell to other players via paypal or ebay or whatever. This disrupts the balance of the game, goes against the principles of the point of the game, and is no longer going to be allowed.
While the occiasional sale of 'excess' goods is not going to be chased after, any account that is clearly abusing this will be in violation and subject to penalty, suspension or deletion.

Hardly, as she plays herself... As previously stated...



/Whitey

WhiteyDude wrote:

RepliJake wrote:

12agnar0k wrote:ER so WHAT if tiger girl only made an account for her freind to help him out and doesnt intend to play the game just to help out her freind. I think youll find there is nothign in the rules about doing that , although it verges on the edge of multying so i suggest that person doesnt help out the freind i.e giving there res. to him daily, holding stuff on PPT tho is normal game pratise if you can trust someone , so yeah i think ive confused myself enough for oen day within my post.

ot it could come under


'Resource Farms' Limits

It has been noticed that some accounts exist solely to gain resources, in order to sell to other players via paypal or ebay or whatever. This disrupts the balance of the game, goes against the principles of the point of the game, and is no longer going to be allowed.
While the occiasional sale of 'excess' goods is not going to be chased after, any account that is clearly abusing this will be in violation and subject to penalty, suspension or deletion.

Hardly, as she plays herself... As previously stated...



/Whitey

But I was replying to 12ag's comment, not what is actually the case...

RepliJake wrote:

WhiteyDude wrote:

RepliJake wrote:

12agnar0k wrote:ER so WHAT if tiger girl only made an account for her freind to help him out and doesnt intend to play the game just to help out her freind. I think youll find there is nothign in the rules about doing that , although it verges on the edge of multying so i suggest that person doesnt help out the freind i.e giving there res. to him daily, holding stuff on PPT tho is normal game pratise if you can trust someone , so yeah i think ive confused myself enough for oen day within my post.

ot it could come under


'Resource Farms' Limits

It has been noticed that some accounts exist solely to gain resources, in order to sell to other players via paypal or ebay or whatever. This disrupts the balance of the game, goes against the principles of the point of the game, and is no longer going to be allowed.
While the occiasional sale of 'excess' goods is not going to be chased after, any account that is clearly abusing this will be in violation and subject to penalty, suspension or deletion.

Hardly, as she plays herself... As previously stated...



/Whitey

But I was replying to 12ag's comment, not what is actually the case...

yeah if the accoutn was only made and used to send res to whitey and , i.e earn 1k uu a day all goes to whitey then its ibreakign the rule, to be only used for ppt 2-4 days a week to hold naq for whitey isnt against any rule, as it does not soley exist to gain res. to sell to another player, it just helps another player store naq whilst on ppt. If the accoutn did nothign else it still wouldnt be against the rules accordign to the rules. unless theres another rule aroudn somewhere.

thats what i tried to say the first time

WhiteyDude wrote:I've been informed by some random n00b (GeneralOneill) that I am a "feeder" account, and a multi.


I welcome this - he has threatened to tell everyone about my "multiing ways" on the forums - so I thought I'd make a nice easy thread for him to find about it .


A little earlier I wrote a PM asking him to please accuse me of being a cheater on here... He said "im no grass, i wont stick you in.".


I'm really hoping he will "grass" on me - I just can't wait.


I'll PM him this link - and I'll be massing him not to soon for unrelated reasons if he doesn't give me what he owes me .



Fun, Fun, Fun.

/Whitey

Can't believe I missed this - or in fact that you called GeneralOneill a 'noob' - roflmao!

But really - any flak that you have got in this thread, Whitey, is all down to you - since you posted it.

And I'm quite interested in tigergirl's comments too:

TigerGirl wrote:I have little interest in this game. I started playing because Whitey plays.

and...

TigerGirl wrote:when I got the chance to go on PPT, and help Whitey out by holding his naq, I was glad to help

also...

TigerGirl wrote:I stick around because I like the people in chat, and because Whitey is around. Maybe one day I'll decide to start playing fully, and build up a strike and try attacking people. Maybe I won't.

Now, call me a bluff old cynic - but that kind of smacks of 'I have an account because Whitey does and I want to help him'. She even says that she has virtually no interest in the game - so the question is - is getting a friend to maintain an account, just so they can help you out, cheating? Is it actually any different to having another account yourself?

Wolf359 wrote:Now, call me a bluff old cynic - but that kind of smacks of 'I have an account because Whitey does and I want to help him'. She even says that she has virtually no interest in the game - so the question is - is getting a friend to maintain an account, just so they can help you out, cheating? Is it actually any different to having another account yourself?

I like how you twist her words around, even when they're written write above you..

She didn't say, "I have an account because Whitey does", she said "I started playing because Whitey plays". Tell me Wolf359: ever given out your recruit link? That's someone who's started playing because of you. The reason you're asking them to join the game with YOUR recruit link is so they can HELP you, proactivly or not, otherwise you'd just give them a link to the main site.


She decided to start playing the game because she knew I spent a bit of times playing it, and it might be nice to play "together" if possible


So if someone doesn't have much intrest in the game, they shouldn't be allowed to play? I know some people like EtL don't enjyo the game much anymore - he said a long time ago he'd lost intrest - think we should boot him out?

I've never asked her to maintain her account just for me - only time I've ever asked her to even log in is when she's on PPT with my naq and I want it back. Would you call it "maintaining someones account" by reminding them their PPT is almost over?


I've generally had a lot of respect for you over the time I've known you here Wolf359, but unless your arguement improves drastically - maybe by getting a main point with logical reasoning behind it - I've lost quite a bit reading what you have to say and replying.




/Whitey

Whitey, pay me the $1500 you still owe me for the UT, you've been selling 600bill naq for $$$ but haven't sent me any yet and don't reply to me.