Vac in ascension
-
~not telling~
-
#?#
chrishalomaster wrote:ok...well wont descention just bring civil war to everybody. everybody will descend everyone...and then no mre ascended people and everybody would ascend again and then descend again...its stupid
De-ascending someone can be costly.. or will be.. You can't buy turns, so people will use them wisely and won't go descending random people..
-
Anubisstargate
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 4:22 am
- ID: 0
-
#?#
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Anubisstargate wrote:but i think there would be limits to de-ascending, coz new people will get de-ascended straight away, therefore de-ascension won't occur all the time
You are assuming then that those already ascended will be bothering to watch new ascended accounts just to descend them.
I doubt it - unless they are watching for a specific person who has annoyed them. Besides, even if this was to occur - teh trick would be to get a friend who could descend your enemy if they descended you.
I also believe that to descend someone should be extremely costly and would weaken the attacking player so much that they could be at risk of descension themselves.
I don't know how it will work (if and when it ever comes in) - but I would imagine that 1 descension wouldn't automatically remove all of a persons bonuses - perhaps to be fully descended you would need to be 'descended' as many times as you have ascended? Would seem fair - you have put a lot of effort into ascending X amount of times - so your enemy should have to put in a similar amount of effort to fully descend you.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
