Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:07 am
by ~not telling~
ok...well wont descention just bring civil war to everybody. everybody will descend everyone...and then no mre ascended people and everybody would ascend again and then descend again...its stupid
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:16 am
by #?#
chrishalomaster wrote:ok...well wont descention just bring civil war to everybody. everybody will descend everyone...and then no mre ascended people and everybody would ascend again and then descend again...its stupid
De-ascending someone can be costly.. or will be.. You can't buy turns, so people will use them wisely and won't go descending random people..
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:20 am
by ~not telling~
youd be suprised...i know many people that would
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 am
by Anubisstargate
but i think there would be limits to de-ascending, coz new people will get de-ascended straight away, therefore de-ascension won't occur all the time
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:49 am
by #?#
Anubisstargate wrote:but i think there would be limits to de-ascending, coz new people will get de-ascended straight away, therefore de-ascension won't occur all the time
I also doubt that one could be descended past prior.. would be too much.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:53 am
by Norman
chrishalomaster wrote:youd be suprised...i know many people that would
You mean you know many people that would
try.
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:13 pm
by Wolf359
Anubisstargate wrote:but i think there would be limits to de-ascending, coz new people will get de-ascended straight away, therefore de-ascension won't occur all the time
You are assuming then that those already ascended will be bothering to watch new ascended accounts just to descend them.
I doubt it - unless they are watching for a specific person who has annoyed them. Besides, even if this was to occur - teh trick would be to get a friend who could descend your enemy if they descended you.
I also believe that to descend someone should be extremely costly and would weaken the attacking player so much that they could be at risk of descension themselves.
I don't know how it will work (if and when it ever comes in) - but I would imagine that 1 descension wouldn't automatically remove all of a persons bonuses - perhaps to be fully descended you would need to be 'descended' as many times as you have ascended? Would seem fair - you have put a lot of effort into ascending X amount of times - so your enemy should have to put in a similar amount of effort to fully descend you.