StarGateWars Forums

Hensenshi wrote:

Neimenljivi wrote:

S T I wrote:

Neimenljivi wrote:S T I, I think u missed the point...it is like this COP are attacking CIA officers and they say it's fair. When CIA member even WARNS officers of Lego that they'll be massed if they do not leave, CIA is bad but I don't see CoP giving a warning or something...

~N

no I didn't, just i wouldn't say give a warning, its a fair tactic which ever way you want to dress it up. If people want to give warning good for them. just if they are supporting them in other ways & attacking/farming thinking they are under protection of the do not attack officers policy which they think is in force..

thats why i made apoint of mentioning it in my first post. you have to look at the whole picture.

these rogue officers weather they have been told or are doing it of there own backs put all at risk. imo

Yeah but I fail to see why is CIA bad now cause it gives warning that officers of lego will be massed while COP isn't bad cause they don't give warning

~N

CIA is doing the same thing that CoP has done. CoP got called out for unfair play, and now that CIA is doing it, CIA should get called out for unfair play, or they should agree it's fair grounds. Personally? I'm going to be massing everyone who's got a CIA commander. Starting now.

Tell me, when did CoP give warning about officers being massed and why is CIA now worse than CoP when they GAVE WARNING? Also btw, for ur info, CoP is massing officers for a long time and u expect us to sit there and relax? If my enemy starts giving low hits, I'll start giving even lower hits to defeat him

~N

Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:I am disgusted to see such things happening...from both sides.



Teal'auc

That's why u have my respect, always fair even tho I farm u now sometimes, I hope u don't mind...but u're still among rear ppl in CoP I respect...And it is totaly true yeah tho I haven't massed any officers but will do to those who did it to my friends

~N

Regardless of what side you are on, officers are a viable target. Like planets they are effectively part of the account supplying resources that can be used in the war. Some we do it others wont, while others give warnings. Neither side is good or bad for doing it, they are both using a viable tactic in this war.

Neimenljivi wrote:

Hensenshi wrote:

Neimenljivi wrote:

S T I wrote:

Neimenljivi wrote:S T I, I think u missed the point...it is like this COP are attacking CIA officers and they say it's fair. When CIA member even WARNS officers of Lego that they'll be massed if they do not leave, CIA is bad but I don't see CoP giving a warning or something...

~N

no I didn't, just i wouldn't say give a warning, its a fair tactic which ever way you want to dress it up. If people want to give warning good for them. just if they are supporting them in other ways & attacking/farming thinking they are under protection of the do not attack officers policy which they think is in force..

thats why i made apoint of mentioning it in my first post. you have to look at the whole picture.

these rogue officers weather they have been told or are doing it of there own backs put all at risk. imo

Yeah but I fail to see why is CIA bad now cause it gives warning that officers of lego will be massed while COP isn't bad cause they don't give warning

~N

CIA is doing the same thing that CoP has done. CoP got called out for unfair play, and now that CIA is doing it, CIA should get called out for unfair play, or they should agree it's fair grounds. Personally? I'm going to be massing everyone who's got a CIA commander. Starting now.

Tell me, when did CoP give warning about officers being massed and why is CIA now worse than CoP when they GAVE WARNING? Also btw, for ur info, CoP is massing officers for a long time and u expect us to sit there and relax? If my enemy starts giving low hits, I'll start giving even lower hits to defeat him

~N

I didn't say worse. Do you see the word worse in my post? No. Giving a warning means nothing. You still have the intention. I'm not saying the CoP is anything close to perfect, but CIA have done the same as CoP. So, what CoP has done is now being done by CIA. You guys think your all high and mighty being more "honorable" than the CoP because you gave a warning? *coughcoughcouchhackhackhackcoughhackhack* oh sorry, I'm just allergic to bullcrap. By your logic I can give warnings out and all of a sudden it's ok? If the CIA wants to hit officers, so be it, but those of us who have agreed not to hit officers(like me) are going to start hitting officers.

@just4laughs: Gotten to me? I fail to see how my word phrasing is him "getting to me".

Sovetski wrote:Regardless of what side you are on, officers are a viable target. Like planets they are effectively part of the account supplying resources that can be used in the war. Some we do it others wont, while others give warnings. Neither side is good or bad for doing it, they are both using a viable tactic in this war.

With all due respect - tactic or not, it is still considered by low tactic. At least in my books.



Teal'auc

Yes my friend, I agree with you. Some are more honour bound than others, some hold more decency than others, and these some reside on both sides of the conflict.

Silliness!



C'mon, people, even though I don't play, it is a rather LOGICAL strategy to cut an enemy's supply line.

Is it fair? Is war fair? Is this a war game? Is this not just a game?

Ok.

J

Agapooka wrote:Silliness!



C'mon, people, even though I don't play, it is a rather LOGICAL strategy to cut an enemy's supply line.

Is it fair? Is war fair? Is this a war game? Is this not just a game?

Ok.

J

How dare you call the game "Just" a game, take that back! You'll hurt its feelings and wont want to play with us anymore!

okay, stepping back from the spam.

Agapooka wrote:Silliness!



C'mon, people, even though I don't play, it is a rather LOGICAL strategy to cut an enemy's supply line.

Is it fair? Is war fair? Is this a war game? Is this not just a game?

Ok.

J

Matter of personal point of view, friend. Some people prefer to play without hitting those, who might be just neutral friends of the enemy. Just because it's game, I feel no need to do such things.



Teal'auc

Hensenshi: Its what tok'ra says, he's always like "Don't make me call you out" "I'm gonna call that guy out man- he's just like totally gonna get called out" "I'm like a total caller outer and if you cant take that well I'm just gonna have to call you out too" -its an utterly meaningless phrase that he's just decided to start using and now you've starting- are you actually doing any "Calling" is there this particular place these people you are supposedly calling coming "out" from?

just4laughs - lol 'calling someone out' sounds like what you do when you want to have a 'dance off' to see who is the best dancer ala the Michael Jackson filmclip for 'Beat It' or the Wierd Al version 'Eat It'

Maybe our friend Tok'ra/Wes jenson is a bit of a Micheal Jackson fan?

Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:

Agapooka wrote:Silliness!



C'mon, people, even though I don't play, it is a rather LOGICAL strategy to cut an enemy's supply line.

Is it fair? Is war fair? Is this a war game? Is this not just a game?

Ok.

J

Matter of personal point of view, friend. Some people prefer to play without hitting those, who might be just neutral friends of the enemy. Just because it's game, I feel no need to do such things.



Teal'auc

Yes, it is, of course a different point of view. Some might insist that if a person is helping an enemy by "feeding" them, they cannot be neutral.

We can say that it is immoral to attack people that may or may not be neutral, but my only point is to say that if we are trying to keep war moral, perhaps we should consider the morality of war itself. What if, what if war ISN'T moral? If war is not moral, wouldn't it be absurd to war and criticise others for doing soemthing that we perceive as immoral, during said war?

I find it comical, that's all. My personality is also light and comical, usually. Weeeh.

J

Mango wrote:Maybe our friend Tok'ra/Wes jenson is a bit of a Micheal Jackson fan?

And my fav quote of the month.