StarGateWars Forums

Posted: **Thu May 24, 2007 8:06 am**

dis is a good idea. now lets see it happen.

Posted: **Thu May 24, 2007 8:09 am**

Am I the only one who does not want to see this suggestion to come into game? :roll:

Teal'auc

Posted: **Fri May 25, 2007 1:04 am**

Thanks for making it a sticky :-D

Hopefully it will be noticed now

Posted: **Fri May 25, 2007 1:42 am**

the reason it is stickied is that Admin is planning major alliance update, and he wants input from players... so it will be noticed...

Posted: **Mon May 28, 2007 5:56 am**

good diea, i hope its implemented along with that "further developed alliance settings" topic

thatd make alliances alot better as well

Posted: **Mon May 28, 2007 6:36 am**

The only reason why someone wouldn't want this is if they don't trust their alliance leader with their stats...which is possible, though it begs the question why you would place yourself in an alliance under someone you don't trust.

Perhaps an opt-out option could be added?

Posted: **Mon May 28, 2007 6:41 am**

Taure wrote:The only reason why someone wouldn't want this is if they don't trust their alliance leader with their stats...which is possible, though it begs the question why you would place yourself in an alliance under someone you don't trust.

Perhaps an opt-out option could be added?

I was gonna suggest something like that, make a thing like the "accepting officers" tick box, if you wan't alliance leaders (aka you trust them) you check the box, if you don't then leave it unchecked....

Posted: **Tue May 29, 2007 11:07 am**

Alliance leaders can ussually spy on pretty much anyone in the alliance so i dont think it really invades peoples privacy, just makes it more organised and easier for the leader to get the info they require instead of having to spy for it

Posted: **Tue May 29, 2007 11:23 am**

Predator wrote:Alliance leaders can ussually spy on pretty much anyone in the alliance so i dont think it really invades peoples privacy, just makes it more organised and easier for the leader to get the info they require instead of having to spy for it

Well, you are right with the stats thing... so I am not against this. But I am still against suggestion that leaders can see attack logs of their members...

Teal'auc

Posted: **Tue May 29, 2007 11:49 am**

Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Well, you are right with the stats thing... so I am not against this. But I am still against suggestion that leaders can see attack logs of their members...

Teal'auc

I agree ......... I dont my alliance leader to see my raiding list ..lol

Posted: **Tue May 29, 2007 12:06 pm**

Mato wrote:I agree ......... I dont my alliance leader to see my raiding list ..lol

I don't want my aliance leader to mass my potential targets..

Teal'auc

Posted: **Tue May 29, 2007 10:53 pm**

Then it's simple, make it so that alliance leader can see all stats. Just not see attack/spy logs?

Posted: **Tue May 29, 2007 10:54 pm**

that seems ok...

Posted: **Wed May 30, 2007 9:04 am**

But we DO NOT see if they get massed sabbed by someone then...
Plus if they say they got unfairly massed and they did not attack someone while they did it, we would see quickly potential lies and so the problems will be solved more easily.

Posted: **Wed May 30, 2007 10:27 am**

Apophis ™ wrote:But we DO NOT see if they get massed sabbed by someone then...
Plus if they say they got unfairly massed and they did not attack someone while they did it, we would see quickly potential lies and so the problems will be solved more easily.

Well, tbh, I don't want leaders to see if I get massed or not...so as said, I think if alliance leaders see stats, that's ok, but I say no to logs.

Teal'auc

StarGateWars Forums

Alliance Leaders