Page 3 of 4
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:26 am
by buck
Jadzia wrote:Buck?
You mean you're going to play a 'Write the Story' game?
Fun. I really think Jason would like that, yeah... what am I saying? I'm *sure* he'll be glad to see you've caused all but a few members to leave by doing that funny thing you propose.
Amusing.
As i said, If thats the way you all want it, as you keep claiming thats the way it is, then thats the way you can have it, Of course if thats not the way you want it you could simply apoligise now?
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:27 am
by Pungemo
Obviously the moderators have no intention of answering the question. The only thing they seemed to have mustered is a large amount of sarcasm, and a quite frankly nonsense claim that it was questioning a moderator's decision. There was no question asked, no-one was insulted. In fact the tone was entirely neutral. So really, if you can't muster the maturity to address the issue then I really don't understand what the purpose is in having moderators.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:29 am
by geisha
Diamond Dust wrote:Buck, I love you.
Our babies will have diamond crusted cots.
hey hey, buck is mine
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:29 am
by Bazsy
Pungemo wrote:Obviously the moderators have no intention of answering the question. The only thing they seemed to have mustered is a large amount of sarcasm, and a quite frankly nonsense claim that it was questioning a moderator's decision. There was no question asked, no-one was insulted. In fact the tone was entirely neutral. So really, if you can't muster the maturity to address the issue then I really don't understand what the purpose is in having moderators.
Now you questioning the moderators;)
*Guys we have it, take him back to prison;)* j/k
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:30 am
by buck
Pungemo wrote:Obviously the moderators have no intention of answering the question. The only thing they seemed to have mustered is a large amount of sarcasm, and a quite frankly nonsense claim that it was questioning a moderator's decision. There was no question asked, no-one was insulted. In fact the tone was entirely neutral. So really, if you can't muster the maturity to address the issue then I really don't understand what the purpose is in having moderators.
The issue has been addressed so many times , that it is now weareing 15 layers of winter clothing in the summer. As has clearly been stated, you are not allowed to show support for a banned player, or demand him to be unbanned on the forum, now saying "unban Billy Bob Thornton" is demanding he be unbanned, Is it not? yes yes it is. Therefor you have been told not to do it, if you refuse to read this and not understand it again then perhaps you should be banned for refuseing to listen to the mods, after all, we are being nasty today arnt we
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:32 am
by Pungemo
rules wrote:1. You may not post your unique link anywhere on this board.
2. Recruiting officers or for an alliance can ONLY take place in the respective Recruitment forum.
3. The use of swearing and of abusive language is strictly forbidden.
4. You may not post the same thing multiple times.
5. You may not attack another member's spelling / English.
6. Disrespecting the moderators is strictly forbidden. If you have a problem with a moderator, PM an Administrator about it.
7. You must post respectfully, whether or not you agree with an idea that has been posted, and even if you have been insulted. The proper way to handle such a situation is by consulting a moderator.
8. Your avatar may not exceed a width of 200 pixels and / or a height of 200 pixels.
9. You may not discuss or bring up any matter that can be considered sexually suggestive. This forum is used by people of a very young age and is not intended for such material.
10. You may not post threads that are exclusively pointless, outside of the spam temple.
11. You may not trade outside of the market forums. COnsult the market rules before using the market.
12. Your signature may not have more than 2 banners in it. Your signature may not distort the forum in any way.
13. You may not advertise ANY game that is not a Kingdom Game Productions game.
14. You may not sell a forum account.
15. You may not ask for favours from the staff of this forum.
16. You may not discuss ascension outside of its respective forums.
17. No one in this game may put the name of another player or alliance in one of their own signatures/avatars/ anywhere on this forum, in any form of insulting manner or without the person's permission.
18. You may not misinform forum members about game updates that did not take place. Falsifying game updates also breaks rule 10.
19. You may not spam outside of the temple of spam.
20. You may not attempt to have a thread closed by spamming it.
21. You may not post on the part of a banned forum user or help a banned forum user to access the forum through any other means, including allowing the banned member access to your account.
22. You may not publicly defy the moderators. If you have issues with a moderator, refer to rule 6.
Nowhere there does it say anything about supporting a banned member.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:33 am
by Juliette
Buck wrote:As i said, If thats the way you all want it, as you keep claiming thats the way it is, then thats the way you can have it, Of course if thats not the way you want it you could simply apoligise now?
You've twisted my words...
But oh, okay.
If you want me to apologise, will do.
I apologise for stating a few broadly carried opinions.
I apologise for being interpreted as criticising the moderation, despite my desperate attempts at pointing out that wasn't what I was doing.
I apologise for making a comparison between SGW and Babylon 5.
I apologise for fornicating with the Root of All Evil.
I apologise for weighing less than a feather.
I apologise for not burning on a pyre.
Oh, by the way... could someone reply to Tok'ra's polite question about defining SGW General? I think it would give some closure...
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:36 am
by Bazsy
Pungemo wrote:rules wrote:1. You may not post your unique link anywhere on this board.
2. Recruiting officers or for an alliance can ONLY take place in the respective Recruitment forum.
3. The use of swearing and of abusive language is strictly forbidden.
4. You may not post the same thing multiple times.
5. You may not attack another member's spelling / English.
6. Disrespecting the moderators is strictly forbidden. If you have a problem with a moderator, PM an Administrator about it.
7. You must post respectfully, whether or not you agree with an idea that has been posted, and even if you have been insulted. The proper way to handle such a situation is by consulting a moderator.
8. Your avatar may not exceed a width of 200 pixels and / or a height of 200 pixels.
9. You may not discuss or bring up any matter that can be considered sexually suggestive. This forum is used by people of a very young age and is not intended for such material.
10. You may not post threads that are exclusively pointless, outside of the spam temple.
11. You may not trade outside of the market forums. COnsult the market rules before using the market.
12. Your signature may not have more than 2 banners in it. Your signature may not distort the forum in any way.
13. You may not advertise ANY game that is not a Kingdom Game Productions game.
14. You may not sell a forum account.
15. You may not ask for favours from the staff of this forum.
16. You may not discuss ascension outside of its respective forums.
17. No one in this game may put the name of another player or alliance in one of their own signatures/avatars/ anywhere on this forum, in any form of insulting manner or without the person's permission.
18. You may not misinform forum members about game updates that did not take place. Falsifying game updates also breaks rule 10.
19. You may not spam outside of the temple of spam.
20. You may not attempt to have a thread closed by spamming it.
21. You may not post on the part of a banned forum user or help a banned forum user to access the forum through any other means, including allowing the banned member access to your account.
22. You may not publicly defy the moderators. If you have issues with a moderator, refer to rule 6.
Nowhere there does it say anything about supporting a banned member.
6,
15,21,22
choose one;)
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:37 am
by Juliette
Ah, Baszy... I grant you the bragging rights on that case of pwnage.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:39 am
by Pungemo
Bazsy wrote:
6,15,21,22
choose one;)
6 - No disrespect was expressed.
15 - No favour was asked from any staff member. It was aimed at the general staff. Sorry, that is a completely different issue.
21 - No-one posted on behalf of myself. No-one gave me access to their account.
22 - "Bring Pungemo Back" does not express any defiance.
Sorry Bazsy, but none of those rules say anything about it.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:40 am
by buck
Let me run you through the rules that have been broken.
6. Disrespecting the moderators is strictly forbidden. If you have a problem with a moderator, PM an Administrator about it.
By starting this thread, and by openly undermineing the mods, and yes, that part of unban etc in the sig was breaking this rule, as that was a mids decision, should i go on, i think i should...
10. You may not post threads that are exclusively pointless, outside of the spam temple.
Obviously this thread falls under that catagory, yes, it is "excessivly pointless" and will be moved to the spam temple once we have "corrected" you.
15. You may not ask for favours from the staff of this forum.
Asking for said person to be unbanned is asking for a favour, as only members of staff of this forum have that power.
17. No one in this game may put the name of another player or alliance in one of their own signatures/avatars/ anywhere on this forum, in any form of insulting manner or without the person's permission.
Was permission given? I dont know i thought id throw this one in the mixer .
19. You may not spam outside of the temple of spam.
This thread
21. You may not post on the part of a banned forum user or help a banned forum user to access the forum through any other means, including allowing the banned member access to your account.
Do i even need to post an explaination about this one?
22. You may not publicly defy the moderators. If you have issues with a moderator, refer to rule 6.
Well, your doing that right now.
Haveing fun? Or would you like to stop talking, Im offering you a way out here, its to stop posting and walk away from the arguement before you get banned for , well, look at all the rules your breaking....
Jadzia wrote:Buck wrote:As i said, If thats the way you all want it, as you keep claiming thats the way it is, then thats the way you can have it, Of course if thats not the way you want it you could simply apoligise now?
You've twisted my words...
But oh, okay.
If you want me to apologise, will do.
I apologise for stating a few broadly carried opinions.
I apologise for being interpreted as criticising the moderation, despite my desperate attempts at pointing out that wasn't what I was doing.
I apologise for making a comparison between SGW and Babylon 5.
I apologise for fornicating with the Root of All Evil.
I apologise for weighing less than a feather.
I apologise for not burning on a pyre.
Oh, by the way... could someone reply to Tok'ra's polite question about defining SGW General? I think it would give some closure...
Accepted.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:43 am
by Quina Quen
rules wrote:122. You may not publicly defy the moderators. If you have issues with a moderator, refer to rule 6.
Define defiance. Also define how defying a mod can be counter productive, especially where the defiance relates to a mods own inability to do his/her said role.
You see these rules are like polystyrene boards, they're so easy to poke holes in. But please don't ban me Bucket, I'll never get to see our children grow.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:43 am
by Pungemo
Ahhh, I see buck. You're threatening to ban me because you don't like the question I'm asking, which you have still failed to answer. It's a shame, I always saw you as quite reasonable.
EDIT: In addition, there is a very simple point to this thread. It is stated in the first post of the thread. What IS pointless spam is going on for 2 pages about crippling the forum for the heck of it.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:46 am
by buck
Pungemo wrote:Ahhh, I see buck. You're threatening to ban me because you don't like the question I'm asking, which you have still failed to answer. It's a shame, I always saw you as quite reasonable.
As i keep saying, there is only so much you can push "nice old buck" until he starts getting annoyed, and your question has been answered OH so many times , are you failing to read the thread? Perhaps you should actually read the entire thread again, then come back, then apoligise for breaking all these rules, then maybe you will be let off. So yes, your question has been answered, so many times, by more than 1 moderator.
Getting through to you yet, or would you like me to requote everything i, bazsy and geisha have said and put a short explaination under each one.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:48 am
by Pungemo
Perhaps you failed to notice my previous post, the one detailing that that signature broke none of the rules that you or bazsy claimed it did.
Pungemo wrote:6 - No disrespect was expressed.
15 - No favour was asked from any staff member. It was aimed at the general staff. Sorry, that is a completely different issue.
21 - No-one posted on behalf of myself. No-one gave me access to their account.
22 - "Bring Pungemo Back" does not express any defiance.