Page 3 of 4

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:53 am
by killtacular
cake and icecream yum

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:57 pm
by Dundee
High Empty wrote:
Dundee [EPA] wrote:Just wanted to add something to what I posted above about farming.

EPA's policy and subsequently Terra Protectorate's policy in regards to farming is to recoup any losses from the attackers alliance mates if it is not possible to do so directly from the attacker.

So the only reason Terra Protectorate members would EVER farm any active account or accounts of those in active alliances are if someone or you yourself farmed Terra Protectorate.

This message is primarily aimed at huxley who has decided that 5p4z attacking 3 members of alpha in order to recouperate losses from eros's farming is a major issue worthy of my attention.



And so it might just be, on a side note, if your empire is in your war, then your terra protectorate, Just lost it's protection!


That might be true if you are assuming we could not fight a battle on more than one front.

That also assumes that should Terra Protectorate be backed into a corner that they cannot fight themselves. Which could not be further from the truth.

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:57 pm
by Dundee
killtacular wrote:cake and icecream yum


Is that code? I fail to understand this!!!! :shock:

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:40 pm
by killtacular
Yes have cake and ice cream

There not good enough or not active enough to be in the epa so you made another allaince but you protect them. Thats what I see you saying. You should of just said training allaince but you might of said that I forget.

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:33 pm
by Dundee
killtacular wrote:Yes have cake and ice cream

There not good enough or not active enough to be in the epa so you made another allaince but you protect them. Thats what I see you saying. You should of just said training allaince but you might of said that I forget.


Neither is the case our criteria were quite specific to our particular needs.

Not something to be discussed on a public forum anyway........ :shock:

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:38 am
by J.S.
JESUS TAP DANCING CHRIST!!!!!!!

EPA = Alliance that will mass you if you attack their smaller brothers who are just trying to grow up.

TP - Smaller brother alliance to EPA who are trying to grow up but have EPA backing them if needed.

ME - Guy who remembers how the game used to be like when if you had protection from a larger alliance you had it made, not in the n00by way where you attack me twice and I send you a message going im gonna get "INSERT POWERFUL ALLIANCE" to mass you and your whole alliance that we have today!!!!

IF EPA are in a war they don't want TP dragged into it, just becuase of something that they do. They are seperate entities.. So it's like if I went up to you and 5 of your mates, punched one of them in the face and started giving him a beating he probably deserves, I would expect the 5 of ye to come towards me fists flying. But what I don't expect is that ye go after my baby brother and beat the crap out of him and he is clueless as to whats going on..

Anyway good luck Brian and crew..

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:51 am
by RobinInDaHood
/Homer Simpson voice on

Your baby brother makes me so maaaad!

:lol:

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:11 am
by REK
J.S. wrote:JESUS TAP DANCING CHRIST!!!!!!!

EPA = Alliance that will mass you if you attack their smaller brothers who are just trying to grow up.

TP - Smaller brother alliance to EPA who are trying to grow up but have EPA backing them if needed.

ME - Guy who remembers how the game used to be like when if you had protection from a larger alliance you had it made, not in the n00by way where you attack me twice and I send you a message going im gonna get "INSERT POWERFUL ALLIANCE" to mass you and your whole alliance that we have today!!!!

IF EPA are in a war they don't want TP dragged into it, just becuase of something that they do. They are seperate entities.. So it's like if I went up to you and 5 of your mates, punched one of them in the face and started giving him a beating he probably deserves, I would expect the 5 of ye to come towards me fists flying. But what I don't expect is that ye go after my baby brother and beat the crap out of him and he is clueless as to whats going on..

Anyway good luck Brian and crew..



lol

all are guilty by association ;)



DOH'

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:59 am
by Krahe
wow... so EPA wants their enemies during war to leave their training alliance alone... wow... I guess TP is so special, they are more special then DD2 and LLS who got dragged into the COP/CIA war because of the actions of their protecting alliance.

Let us all bow down and worship the EPA for the tremendous knowledge and foresight for creating a "growing" alliance as opposed to a "training" alliance.














ok im done with the sarcasm! really! I am! well for this post....

so in summary of what just happened. EPA created a new training alliance TP. normal conditions apply.
ooooh and something interesting, according to EPA, they are allowed to farm your alliance if someone in your alliance attacked one of their members for naq... gotta love delusional logic...

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:28 am
by Pele
Krahe wrote:wow... so EPA wants their enemies during war to leave their training alliance alone... wow... I guess TP is so special, they are more special then DD2 and LLS who got dragged into the COP/CIA war because of the actions of their protecting alliance.

Let us all bow down and worship the EPA for the tremendous knowledge and foresight for creating a "growing" alliance as opposed to a "training" alliance.














ok im done with the sarcasm! really! I am! well for this post....

so in summary of what just happened. EPA created a new training alliance TP. normal conditions apply.
ooooh and something interesting, according to EPA, they are allowed to farm your alliance if someone in your alliance attacked one of their members for naq... gotta love delusional logic...


*Sigh* I pity those that don't have the level of intelligence to understand such a simple concept.

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:39 am
by Antius
Pele wrote:
Krahe wrote:wow... so EPA wants their enemies during war to leave their training alliance alone... wow... I guess TP is so special, they are more special then DD2 and LLS who got dragged into the COP/CIA war because of the actions of their protecting alliance.

Let us all bow down and worship the EPA for the tremendous knowledge and foresight for creating a "growing" alliance as opposed to a "training" alliance.














ok im done with the sarcasm! really! I am! well for this post....

so in summary of what just happened. EPA created a new training alliance TP. normal conditions apply.
ooooh and something interesting, according to EPA, they are allowed to farm your alliance if someone in your alliance attacked one of their members for naq... gotta love delusional logic...


*Sigh* I pity those that don't have the level of intelligence to understand such a simple concept.


*Sigh* I pity those that have to use insults instead of their intelligence (if applicable)

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:51 am
by Pele
Antius wrote:
Pele wrote:
Krahe wrote:wow... so EPA wants their enemies during war to leave their training alliance alone... wow... I guess TP is so special, they are more special then DD2 and LLS who got dragged into the COP/CIA war because of the actions of their protecting alliance.

Let us all bow down and worship the EPA for the tremendous knowledge and foresight for creating a "growing" alliance as opposed to a "training" alliance.














ok im done with the sarcasm! really! I am! well for this post....

so in summary of what just happened. EPA created a new training alliance TP. normal conditions apply.
ooooh and something interesting, according to EPA, they are allowed to farm your alliance if someone in your alliance attacked one of their members for naq... gotta love delusional logic...


*Sigh* I pity those that don't have the level of intelligence to understand such a simple concept.


*Sigh* I pity those that have to use insults instead of their intelligence (if applicable)


The idea of it has been explained several times by several people, so I thought rather than explaining at insult may help. ;)

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:59 am
by Wolf359
It's a shame the standard of comment in this forum is even worse than when I left - or is it that people simply like to shout, criticise and attempt to be funny before they READ what is actually said (or are unable to do otherwise)?

Basically, Brian said in his initial post:

1. TP are part of the EPA and the EPA will attack those people who attack TP without provocation.

(the bit in bold, italic, red, underlined writing is a hint!)

2. He also said that TP should not be farming/raiding active accounts (and remember folks - farming is not just one or two (or even three or four, if we're honest) attacks - too many people moan about being 'farmed' after a couple of attacks).

3. If you attack TP because they have been farming/raiding you, then you have just cause to attack them back, and EPA should not intervene (see 1).

Simply - if they attack you, you can attack back - but if you farm/mass without being provoked, then you better be prepared for more attacks.

Seems extremely fair and logical to me - gives people (including TP) fair warning of how and when the EPA will become involved.

That said - it may have been more prudent to simply inform allies/certain alliances personally, and announce nothing in the forum - then simply attack those that massed/farmed/raided TP without provocation.

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:17 am
by Myseri
OMG!!! Does this mean the Wolf is back?!

Re: Terra Protectorate

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:15 pm
by _5p4z_
I'm glad to know i'm not active enough, or good enough killatcular..


_5p4z_