Page 3 of 7
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:22 am
by Couzens
Curumo wrote:Couzens wrote:Dark Bahamut wrote:yes it is lame and stupid
especially since there are only a dozen guys that i wud consider better than me in some of these alliances
and in a 1 on 1 i know i cud beat them
plus i am very annoyed wen i had to spend trillions and i think now that i have the big strike i shud be able to make my trillions back
agreed
instead of spending trillions you could of just toke the easy route and joined DD or smth.
only sed DD since that is who we are on about.
I hope you aren't saying that hiding behind a tag is ok...
no its not alright, it annoys me tbh :@
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:33 am
by Mordack
Couzens wrote:my ascended account wouldnt be where it is today without the advice the DD members gave me either so i am grateful, but when i got farmed up there i didnt complain just toke it and built up a bigger defence.
Yeah, I did the same. I still think DD tags counted for a lot up there though, especially in terms of not-being-raided-into-the-ground.
And I think everybody's going to farm me when I'm asleep tonight, because of what I said in this thread.

Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:39 am
by Draleg
Someone once sayd " the best defence is a good offence "
in other words , if ppl know there going to regret a 100 bil naq hit cos they just lost 1 , 2 or 3 mil supers , who knows howmany coverts and other things you dont need defence from big players , you need defence from players that dont have anything cos they got nothing to lose an can afford getting massed.
I dont have a tril defence , dont need it , you hit me and you pay.
I dont normaly farm so dont farm me , i like the " leave me alone and i wil do the same " aprotch.
And Mordack , thats why the alliance attacfk log is a good thing , your in an alliance to help other members but alsow to get help.
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:42 am
by Couzens
Mordack wrote:Couzens wrote:my ascended account wouldnt be where it is today without the advice the DD members gave me either so i am grateful, but when i got farmed up there i didnt complain just toke it and built up a bigger defence.
Yeah, I did the same. I still think DD tags counted for a lot up there though, especially in terms of not-being-raided-into-the-ground.
And I think everybody's going to farm me when I'm asleep tonight, because of what I said in this thread.

yeh they do count for alot up there as they should, but i just feel alot of people just abuse it. I mean 100bil dmu out and a 20bil defence is pushing it abit .
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:39 am
by ~Krys~
my policy is(will be in 2.5 days) you hit me i go though ur allaince and see who i can hit there
its convient and im making my naq back its that simple i wont ruin my attack in the process but ill make my repairs and naq lost and a bonus
id normally keep it at the person but that cant always happen
im not mean about it im just fair and simple
if i get hit 2-4 times in a week ill pm saying plz stop nicely
after that ill ask for help and/or permission
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:02 am
by Hells__Angel
I will not speak on behalf of DD but I can say that you will not get destroyed for one naq hit.
Personally, every attack I make I expect to be returned, generally I only raid inactive accounts, but sometimes I like a little bit of fun.
On a side note to actually getting farmed... I know I have a defence that is big enough to defend my income, so if I get attacked I'll get pretty pissed off
Another side note, about the DD tag. Of course having a big tag helps and does give protection, but its not because of that tag that we are strong, the tag is strong because of us

Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:15 am
by Hensenshi
Couzens wrote:Mordack wrote:Couzens wrote:my ascended account wouldnt be where it is today without the advice the DD members gave me either so i am grateful, but when i got farmed up there i didnt complain just toke it and built up a bigger defence.
Yeah, I did the same. I still think DD tags counted for a lot up there though, especially in terms of not-being-raided-into-the-ground.
And I think everybody's going to farm me when I'm asleep tonight, because of what I said in this thread.

yeh they do count for alot up there as they should, but i just feel alot of people just abuse it. I mean 100bil dmu out and a 20bil defence is pushing it abit .
Oh? And 2t with 1.3t def isn't pushing it either? Funny, I seem to remember that situation from last night. Interestingly enough, my strike is 4.4trill. Funny how things can be turned around can't they?
Dirty Dozen's farming policy is don't farm us. You get a warning, just one warning, but it's your chance to solve things diplomatically. If you ignore it, we remove your stats. We could be like DDE or Omega and mass for even a probe. But we don't, because that's not us. We go the diplomatic route before we take action. To quote you, we're the strongest alliance out there, so do you really want to mess with us?
~Hensenshi
DD Command
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:35 am
by Couzens
my defence is really alot higher than that but im selling dmu, and because of my covert and current naps i thought that defence would be significant, but i guess my covert doesnt stand for much now.
And yeh DD is the strongest alliance up there and you have gotta have nuts to hit them, but i was just stated some people up there in DD should really get a defence incase someone does hit them. Not for the person being attacked but for the person doing the attacking lol, since he wont have an ascended account left.
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:48 am
by Hensenshi
Couzens wrote:my defence is really alot higher than that but im selling dmu, and because of my covert and current naps i thought that defence would be significant, but i guess my covert doesnt stand for much now.
And yeh DD is the strongest alliance up there and you have gotta have nuts to hit them, but i was just stated some people up there in DD should really get a defence incase someone does hit them. Not for the person being attacked but for the person doing the attacking lol, since he wont have an ascended account left.
1.5t out now, still just 1.3t def. Rather tempting wouldn't you say?
Suffice to say, if we didn't have a NAP, my name would have been in your attack logs.

Lucky you eh?
Yes, it might be nice of us to have some people raise their defense to ward off potential idiots, but that's the person's choice.
The mod who thinks it's funny to change my posts should step forward. I know the rules and follow them well.
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:57 am
by Couzens
i wouldnt be caught dead with this much dmu out with such a petty defence if we didnt have a nap
and yeh i guess it is the persons choice
edit: are you allowed to post my defence?
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 8:13 am
by Hells__Angel
As you can now see... obviously not

Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 8:27 am
by REK
Dark Bahamut wrote:i wud also like to know how farm an alliance is willing to go to stop farmers
if i was farming DDE say, i amnt but lets say i was wud they be willing to go to war with AK over it
or wud any other alliance
do you guys think i shud have attacked those people listed in the convo no matter wat there alliance was?
Of course thats why we exist!

Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:21 am
by Raven
Hensenshi wrote:Couzens wrote:my defence is really alot higher than that but im selling dmu, and because of my covert and current naps i thought that defence would be significant, but i guess my covert doesnt stand for much now.
And yeh DD is the strongest alliance up there and you have gotta have nuts to hit them, but i was just stated some people up there in DD should really get a defence incase someone does hit them. Not for the person being attacked but for the person doing the attacking lol, since he wont have an ascended account left.
1.5t out now, still just 1.3t def. Rather tempting wouldn't you say?
Suffice to say, if we didn't have a NAP, my name would have been in your attack logs.

Lucky you eh?
Yes, it might be nice of us to have some people raise their defense to ward off potential idiots, but that's the person's choice.
The mod who thinks it's funny to change my posts should step forward. I know the rules and follow them well.
on another note as long as Couzens is TL and we dont have a NAP we will retaliate in main for every attack you do in ascension.....the Nap protects both of us in both servers not one way.....so i really doubt if you would wanna attack him even if we didnt have a NaP unless you think an all-out war is a good option for getting some DMU
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:46 am
by mr beast
Mordack wrote:I'm not too bothered about farmers. If I have the naq out, and you can take it, then it's fair game. I won't go crazy and start threatening your pets over stolen naq.

Seems like a reasonable attitude. People tend to get upset a big too easy. Its not that hard building a def, they just wanna increase other stats instead.
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:23 pm
by Bull-E
1 naq hit= massing=childish
that goes for ALL aliences
not ok in my book
just my 2 cents