Page 3 of 3

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:03 am
by Bullseye
REK vs Easy

2 of the ppl i respect the most, plus there pretty even, would be an interesting contest.

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:11 am
by KGC
mclarenf1 wrote:or how about admin(jtest) against the entire server, wait its called an update

We always loose

Illustration: :smt070 :smt027
---------------admin-----players

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:22 am
by Legendary Apophis
KGC wrote:
mclarenf1 wrote:or how about admin(jtest) against the entire server, wait its called an update

We always loose

Illustration: :smt070 :smt027
---------------admin-----players

Hmmm similat situation in ascended server didn't happen like that...
Mojo Rising vs TheOrigin (aka jtest)
Mojo won.

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:23 am
by buck
No-one, Because its no longer possible to fight properly now, Unless they had a bar put on there accounts that meant :

-No Nox
-Sabbing was actually able to take out more than 3 weapons per hit
-Lifers didnt exist nor did miners
-You can raid all UU

You would definatly have a winner then, other than that pretty much anyone who is fiarly equally matched or unequally would be pointless, e.g. somone with a 50mill army vs someone with 100 mill army would go on forever, after the initial massing theres not much more you can do.

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:34 am
by Nox
buck wrote:No-one, Because its no longer possible to fight properly now, Unless they had a bar put on there accounts that meant :

-No Nox
-Sabbing was actually able to take out more than 3 weapons per hit
-Lifers didnt exist nor did miners
-You can raid all UU

You would definatly have a winner then, other than that pretty much anyone who is fiarly equally matched or unequally would be pointless, e.g. somone with a 50mill army vs someone with 100 mill army would go on forever, after the initial massing theres not much more you can do.


what did i do :(

u know if both declare war, nox protection is gone ;)

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:36 am
by buck
Nox wrote:
buck wrote:No-one, Because its no longer possible to fight properly now, Unless they had a bar put on there accounts that meant :

-No Nox
-Sabbing was actually able to take out more than 3 weapons per hit
-Lifers didnt exist nor did miners
-You can raid all UU

You would definatly have a winner then, other than that pretty much anyone who is fiarly equally matched or unequally would be pointless, e.g. somone with a 50mill army vs someone with 100 mill army would go on forever, after the initial massing theres not much more you can do.


what did i do :(

u know if both declare war, nox protection is gone ;)


....So sabbing is still uesless, Lifers and miners still exist, which means 4 days of the week your makeing naq that cant be taken, and nor can your miners be taken...

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:38 am
by Nox
thats true, but i would take the raid from ur list, and bring back untrained dieing has casualties of war, like it used to be :-D

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:40 am
by buck
Nox wrote:thats true, but i would take the raid from ur list, and bring back untrained dieing has casualties of war, like it used to be :-D


Hmm raiding or dieing...Raiding or dieing... either way something ends up not being there anymore.... :-D

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:23 pm
by thorslittleworld
REK v REK girlfriend,,,, that would be slaughter lmao

No doubt in the end the girl will end up on top and rek the under dog

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 8:46 am
by Blackburn
Lord Raf wrote:Zerathull v blackburn

just as they are massing friends


yeah i totally agree 8)
Let's mass zerathull!
Too abd he's in London now :(

Re: 1 VS 1

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:56 pm
by MEZZANINE
Has anyone ever considered a knockout championship ?

All contestants paired off at random regardless of alliance and fight in rounds until the ultimate SGW fighter is found.

Knockout
Fight 1
player 1 -v- Player 2
Fight 2
player 3 -v- Player 4
Fight 2
player 5 -v- Player 6
Fight 3
player 7 -v- Player 8
Fight 4
player 9 -v- Player 10

Semi's
Fight 5
winner fight 1-v-winner fight 2
Fight 6
winner fight 3-v-winner fight 4

Final
Fight 7
winner fight 5 -v- winner fight 6


All fight would need to be a set length like 1 week with 1 week to rebuild in between fight, no PPT's, no help, no farming, no wars for all contestants during there fights. And winning conditions would need to be agreed in advance, and checkable by 2 respected impartial judges.