Page 3 of 4

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:48 am
by S T I
Mr. Brown wrote:
S T I wrote:yep, defence gone, spys gone, 500k attack weapons gone :D

thanks to all the people who gave me the id.

this was totally out orf order.

if anyone want to know why just message



dude you made fun of how he was in a car accident, and he responded, look who's out of order, you ask why the forums aren't fun?? Because Uppity people get all prissy when their jokes at others expense aren't found funny, and when the proverbial Rhino charges, he's still just a stupid Rhino.


why don't you read what was said,

i made no j/k about him being in an accident, in fact the oppisite, i said i was galsd he was ok.

but i supose that his reply of me being raped by my father everynight & me enjoying it is ok with you, must be what you said,

same applies to this person who said this.

hmmm massing someone in a nap for a joke that back fired is really mature i must say :?


the fact u made an unnressacarry comment and got it shoved right back in ur face and u lost the plot , , ah well what more can be said

id's of these people as well please. because i will mass anyone who thinks this is exceptable.

as for the breach of the nap, i have spoken to the people that matter & it has been sorted, they like me think this was not exceptable.

I would not care who it was who said & to who, if it had been a DD, omega or anyone else the same thing would have happened. I did not even look at the alliance.

so you can take it how you want.

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:54 am
by Apadizamek
proof. All we have is you insulting him about his crash and you alleging he insulted you, which i might be the truth but hey! you just want us to take your word.

As for my id i only play quantum and the ingame is caesar. bring it.

Btw, you never said you were glad he was OK.

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:56 am
by Rich™
Caesar wrote:proof. All we have is you insulting him about his crash and you alleging he insulted you, which i might be the truth but hey! you just want us to take your word.

As for my id i only play quantum and the ingame is caesar. bring it.

Btw, you never said you were glad he was OK.


where did he insult him about crashing?

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:59 am
by Apadizamek
S T I wrote:
_Ancient God Anubis_ wrote:Today I was driving down the road with my Dad in the Porsche, and a truck that was along side of us turned into us, was quite shock..


Anyone else been in 1 in the last month?


Glad to hear you are both ok

but sorry to hear about your small car :lol:

keep on topic pls 8)


the red i assume was edited.

Also, i take back me saying you didn't say you were glad that they were OK part you did say that and i apologize for saying that you didn't.

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:01 am
by Rich™
yes the red means edited, i saw what it said before as did a few people, small CAR might be considered insulting the crash (so the mod is too blame) but small XXXX is just a joke.

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:11 am
by Mukasa
_Ancient God Anubis_ wrote:
S T I wrote:yep, defence gone, spys gone, 500k attack weapons gone :D

thanks to all the people who gave me the id.

this was totally out orf order.

if anyone want to know why just message



You forgot to add... NAP breach :lol: :lol:



nope

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:15 am
by Mato
Rich™ wrote:yes the red means edited, i saw what it said before as did a few people, small CAR might be considered insulting the crash (so the mod is too blame) but small XXXX is just a joke.


anyone knows who edited those 2 posts .. plz pm me

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:28 am
by S T I
yes & make public what was said by both parties, then you will see the truth in all its glory :D

thanks to all who saw what was said, for your support

Jeff (S T I)

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:57 am
by ogre9805
i have heard what was said and for the record i dont think either of the posts should of been made on a public forum , so yea i really do think ur as bad as each other for posting what u did , as for the massing that needn`t of happened for something that could well of easily been handled with something like mine was a joke u didnt have to go that far , but alas it wasnt to be


so till u have a decent knowledge of me plz do not assume things that i would find acceptable , cos to assume is to make an ass of u and me

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:22 am
by S T I
ogre9805 wrote:i have heard what was said and for the record i dont think either of the posts should of been made on a public forum , so yea i really do think ur as bad as each other for posting what u did , as for the massing that needn`t of happened for something that could well of easily been handled with something like mine was a joke u didnt have to go that far , but alas it wasnt to be


so till u have a decent knowledge of me plz do not assume things that i would find acceptable , cos to assume is to make an ass of u and me



"so you have heard" so making a j/k & everyone saw it as a j/k, to saying some one is being ###### by their father every night & is enjoying it is the same.

my post has one word missing, its easy to work out what it is, 99% of people know the standing j/k about buying expencive/big cars are a compensation thing for their manhood, so it was nothing more than that.

however saying what he said, is this some kind of j/k which we are all not aware of .

but it is people like you who condone this that give others the go ahead to say more such crap.

if so i live in a totally differnat world of standards than you & by all the pm's i am getting so do many many others.

as for your id, out of respect for all your alliance members, apologising to me for what was said, i will not take any further action untill they decide what to do.

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:55 am
by ogre9805
again ur saying i condone it , never have i said that , i have however said , that i believe u BOTH went too far with the whole incident

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:13 am
by ogre9805
and plz feel free to add me on msn if u wish i`ll happily discuss it with u in a civilised manner

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:18 am
by S T I
ogre9805 wrote:again ur saying i condone it , never have i said that , i have however said , that i believe u BOTH went too far with the whole incident


so what si this then

hmmm massing someone in a nap for a joke that back fired is really mature i must say :?


the fact u made an unnressacarry comment and got it shoved right back in ur face and u lost the plot , , ah well what more can be said

you said you know what was said, so there for you condone it, by saying that both were the same thing you are doing just that.

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:19 am
by General Mod 2
Mato wrote:
anyone knows who edited those 2 posts .. plz pm me


it was me, i changed sti's joke, i saw it like a joke, but the person that created the post did not and responded with foul language, that is why it was removed, my bad if i changed it to "car" and was considered a joke about the crash

Caesar wrote:proof. All we have is you insulting him about his crash and you alleging he insulted you, which i might be the truth but hey! you just want us to take your word.

As for my id i only play quantum and the ingame is caesar. bring it.

Btw, you never said you were glad he was OK.


yes, there was an insult, and i saw it, and yes it used foul language, it is against the rules, so i deleted it

so i have nothing to say about the ingame actions that were taken, but about the misunderstanding from the rest of the viewers in this topic (yes the rest of the viewers, cause the two people in this discussion saw the original posts) it is my fault, and i apologise for it (the "car" part) not deleting the insult to sti, but looking back i should have deleted both

Re: Car Crashes

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:59 am
by ogre9805
thanx to S T I for adding me , we have spoken about my posts and he now knows where i was coming from , apologies for the confusion in contextual paramiters