Page 3 of 7

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:56 pm
by goodie
Nuto vixen wrote:Apparently, not playing the game anymore erases one's memories of the past, and disables your ability to have an opinion, or post upon those opinions which may or may not be game related.

Interesting theory.... I'm not buying it.


Only a group of mindless drones would beleive it...

And we dont have them around... do we?

Opps (looks at certain alliances), maybe we do.

-Goodie

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:08 pm
by Timmy
just to clarify i ascended and am back over 75mil and asked admin if i did anything wrong.

he said no so there was no abuse of bugs here so stop trying to have a go at people

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:24 pm
by goodie
Timmy wrote:just to clarify i ascended and am back over 75mil and asked admin if i did anything wrong.

he said no so there was no abuse of bugs here so stop trying to have a go at people


And yet it was most of the game that crusified Dean_S about it.

-Goodie

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:29 pm
by Timmy
thats a different situation i think and ask yourself did admin say it was ok to do that?

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:49 am
by Dark Bahamut
ah i told you all that all these players were and cud and will do this when the Dean_S thing was going on but no one listened

well you all know now
unless everyone who massed dean_s masses all these players or else you cud at least apologise to him for it since you guys drove him from this game and ruined it for him

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:55 am
by Mystake
more like dean_s ruined it for others. he was a bully, too.

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:11 am
by goodie
[OSL]Mystake wrote:more like dean_s ruined it for others. he was a bully, too.


And i havn't seen ETL act like a bully before?

-Goodie

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:16 am
by Orpheus
goodie wrote:
Timmy wrote:just to clarify i ascended and am back over 75mil and asked admin if i did anything wrong.

he said no so there was no abuse of bugs here so stop trying to have a go at people


And yet it was most of the game that crusified Dean_S about it.

-Goodie


not from the point of view from most of the ppl that massed him. most went afterhim because he was a bully towards the MUCH smaller players, but actually i for one was and actually still am expecting him to strike back some day. But Dean_s is not the topic over here.

Dynamic caps will solve a lot of problems boys and girls, lets not start arguing for something that admin is aware of and is working on.

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:47 am
by Vendetta
mmmmmm I can just taste the double standards in here.

not bad.....but its a bit rich :?

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:09 am
by banno
Goodie wrote:
banno wrote:[although that was sarcastic im not saying i dont agree with ETL. if i did, someone would quote me and say "see! i told you so! dde are just ETL's pawns.."]


See! i told you so! dde are just ETL's pawns..

Notice how DDE wasnt capitalised but ETL was? shows us something. ;)

-Goodie


oh but i capitalised DDE the first time. oooh. you capitalised us. thats shows us something.


as for why i didnt capitalise us the second time, well i already know how good we are, and i don't want to rub it in to all of you.


i hope people dont take me too seriously. its sarcasm hehe. even if im not very good at using it on forums...

Fixed quotes, GeneralMod2 8)

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:11 am
by Nigatsu_Aka
Buying 10k turns: 42bil/k :-D

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:48 am
by Mukasa
Nigatsu_Aka wrote:Buying 10k turns: 42bil/k :-D


broker me :-D

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:10 am
by Hansbrough
you see... here I'm willing to bend a little and say... maybe you raid yourself back to 75 mil, however, my problem is with people with 100 mil and greater armies that are keeping them -- when I thought the bug that allowed that had been fixed, when it hasn't.

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:24 am
by Munchy
I believe the 'bug' that was fixed was the thing that allowed players to get over 75 mil army if they were currently under it. With that players had to either buy uu's and store them on a friends account or have others donate, and then manipulate the brokers to get over via raiding and then rejecting.

With this bug/broker trick/tactic/whatever you have to already be over the limit. It won't let you get any more than you already have, but it will make it so you lose less than you would normally when ascending because you don't have to go all the way back down to 75. (Or 50 and raid back to 75).

Just to clarify some confusion hopefully.

And one more thing. While admin said himself that he doesn't like this, he also agrees that it would be unfair to remove it until some better alternative is put in.

Re: Probably a stupid question...

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:32 am
by Hansbrough
perhaps admin has forgotten his head and forgotten his original intent of ascension.