Re: The Legion Vs Mayhem/Chaos
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:50 pm
Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:I think I already called myself biased in my post. Although I think I called myself neutral as well, a bit contradictory.BenjaminMS wrote:@ Empy: bias much?Indeed most wars have their forum warriors, there is nothing wrong with it (in my opinion) I'm sure I would be one. Almost all war topics are like this. I was just observing that TL likes to have more one-sided posts than mH does. Operative word being more, and not the solely.Lithium wrote:Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:Say the same to people from TL posting and being **Filtered**. I'd say (as a mostly neutral observer (ex-mH)) that both sides are "destroying their reputation and image." In my opinion more so TL but that's just me.Robe wrote:feel free to keep destroying the reputation and image of Mayhem with your cheap forum posts.
Right now the Forum Warriors are TL.
im curious how did u figured itwhile maintaining your neutral observing.
in all wars there are some chit-chat , theres no much difference in this thread compared to many other war threads , its a game it takes fight and some chats
I don't even know why I said anything it was pointless. You all simply seem to be spreading more propaganda (don't get hung up on that word) than MaYHeM.
ive posted my losses aswell
been good mannered to them
all the "forum warrior" crap comes from is some one said it and it's snowballed in some sort of evil just like "sniper" it used to mean some-one who didn't spie and just hit to see who they could mass now it's you got no def so your a sniper.
personally it doesn't matter what terminology you use or if you wanna switch it around
and 4/7 of the time your on ppt anyway
wanna find so forum warriors go to the Twin Kingdoms of Spam
anyway not our fault we like to keep our supporters informed
aslong as you are civil to me (and TL regarding this war) i will be civil to you all
Glorious Dead We Salute You
while maintaining your neutral observing.

