StarGateWars Forums

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Ryuujin Jakka wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.

jason just fixed the damn 1 attack mass thing for whoever was complaining about it , what do you want a world where the underdog never has a chance?

WTH is the point of that theres no point in any wars then , what if at the end of a war someone has just enough naq for a good strike to have a great online , who are you to say he has to pull 100T naq out his ass just to build a defence , then on that

he would have to build his defence every single time he got hit just to fight back ,

its a contradictive thing your talking about here....

Well then underdogs shouldn't challenge the strong. Do you see Luxemburgh challenge the UK? Or do you think Iran, for all it's bravado would dare attack an American base? There are plenty of ways so called underdogs can build up...and then try to mass. The point is not to go piss off people stronger when one is not ready.

arkangel13 wrote:build try to give nothing back.

Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:And to think Ryu defended you guys for nothing!

~LordRse~ wrote:

arkangel13 wrote:build try to give nothing back.

Really honourable!

matty~ wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Ryuujin Jakka wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.

jason just fixed the damn 1 attack mass thing for whoever was complaining about it , what do you want a world where the underdog never has a chance?

WTH is the point of that theres no point in any wars then , what if at the end of a war someone has just enough naq for a good strike to have a great online , who are you to say he has to pull 100T naq out his ass just to build a defence , then on that

he would have to build his defence every single time he got hit just to fight back ,

its a contradictive thing your talking about here....

Well then underdogs shouldn't challenge the strong. Do you see Luxemburgh challenge the UK? Or do you think Iran, for all it's bravado would dare attack an American base? There are plenty of ways so called underdogs can build up...and then try to mass. The point is not to go piss off people stronger when one is not ready.

even if this idea was plausable i think that it wouldnt go into affect like this stupid bank naq stealing idea a guy came up with because all the "bigger" players would just endouge thereselfs in everybodies bank and then that would even make me quit the game..


but seriously a defence equal to the offence, eh lets see here.. are commando squads defensive? no. they are offensive, what about the navy and airforce? offensive, only when people attack our country first is when we get defensive by invading theres and taking everything they can.

so the opposing force has to do the same no matter the size, take what we give and stop complaining.

arkangel13 wrote:build defense to get sabbed out by a cov 39. hahahhahahahah PRICELESS GOATING.

We will kill defs,spies, and Mses to our hearts are fully content and for most part try to give nothing back.

ENJOY the weekend everyone.

matty~ wrote:

arkangel13 wrote:build defense to get sabbed out by a cov 39. hahahhahahahah PRICELESS GOATING.

We will kill defs,spies, and Mses to our hearts are fully content and for most part try to give nothing back.

ENJOY the weekend everyone.

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

matty~ wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Ryuujin Jakka wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.

jason just fixed the damn 1 attack mass thing for whoever was complaining about it , what do you want a world where the underdog never has a chance?

WTH is the point of that theres no point in any wars then , what if at the end of a war someone has just enough naq for a good strike to have a great online , who are you to say he has to pull 100T naq out his ass just to build a defence , then on that

he would have to build his defence every single time he got hit just to fight back ,

its a contradictive thing your talking about here....

Well then underdogs shouldn't challenge the strong. Do you see Luxemburgh challenge the UK? Or do you think Iran, for all it's bravado would dare attack an American base? There are plenty of ways so called underdogs can build up...and then try to mass. The point is not to go piss off people stronger when one is not ready.

even if this idea was plausable i think that it wouldnt go into affect like this stupid bank naq stealing idea a guy came up with because all the "bigger" players would just endouge thereselfs in everybodies bank and then that would even make me quit the game..


but seriously a defence equal to the offence, eh lets see here.. are commando squads defensive? no. they are offensive, what about the navy and airforce? offensive, only when people attack our country first is when we get defensive by invading theres and taking everything they can.

so the opposing force has to do the same no matter the size, take what we give and stop complaining.

Commando squads do not fight wars.. u think countries are going to put their special forces doing jobs any normal trooper can do. Do you even realise how much is invested in the training of a member of any special force? Ideally I would use my country's special forces to assasinate the enemy leadership..eliminate command and control facilities and recon enemy positions.

As for the navy and airforce, you can't send them all off on an invasion. You need planes at homebase to attack enemy fighters and ships to ensure the enemy don't try blockades ..and well I could go on. I'm being simplistic here..but if you think you can send off all your country's assets to war, as a citizen of your own country I'd blow your brains out..for working for the enemy.

matty~ wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

matty~ wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Ryuujin Jakka wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:why is it stupid? because people would actually have to build something? lol
Do you think in real war a nation could just survive on a roving attacking force without a defensive perimeter? SGW is full of holes comparatively. It allows alot of the weak to prosper.

jason just fixed the damn 1 attack mass thing for whoever was complaining about it , what do you want a world where the underdog never has a chance?

WTH is the point of that theres no point in any wars then , what if at the end of a war someone has just enough naq for a good strike to have a great online , who are you to say he has to pull 100T naq out his ass just to build a defence , then on that

he would have to build his defence every single time he got hit just to fight back ,

its a contradictive thing your talking about here....

Well then underdogs shouldn't challenge the strong. Do you see Luxemburgh challenge the UK? Or do you think Iran, for all it's bravado would dare attack an American base? There are plenty of ways so called underdogs can build up...and then try to mass. The point is not to go piss off people stronger when one is not ready.

even if this idea was plausable i think that it wouldnt go into affect like this stupid bank naq stealing idea a guy came up with because all the "bigger" players would just endouge thereselfs in everybodies bank and then that would even make me quit the game..


but seriously a defence equal to the offence, eh lets see here.. are commando squads defensive? no. they are offensive, what about the navy and airforce? offensive, only when people attack our country first is when we get defensive by invading theres and taking everything they can.

so the opposing force has to do the same no matter the size, take what we give and stop complaining.

Commando squads do not fight wars.. u think countries are going to put their special forces doing jobs any normal trooper can do. Do you even realise how much is invested in the training of a member of any special force? Ideally I would use my country's special forces to assasinate the enemy leadership..eliminate command and control facilities and recon enemy positions.

As for the navy and airforce, you can't send them all off on an invasion. You need planes at homebase to attack enemy fighters and ships to ensure the enemy don't try blockades ..and well I could go on. I'm being simplistic here..but if you think you can send off all your country's assets to war, as a citizen of your own country I'd blow your brains out..for working for the enemy.

yes u do need a defence on your base, along with turrets, gun towers, some ships, ext ext and the commando squad was just a example of a strong offensive unit.. BUT

when you go to war with another country you send navy ships with people and gun planes, leaving the rest at the base to defend, then you ship more troops as more is needed, if there is no defensive by all means u can bomb it if u want, but you have to realise that once a bomb touches our grounds, 50 will go off all over your country as a defensive manuver since we do not want to get bombed again.

so all in all were back to the part about whining since were not giving u to much to mass, well, when theres what..110 people in oe and 21 in ricos, what do you expect, when theres like 6-7 people in oe with cov 38 and like 3 with 39?

i can give ya that answer.. u shouldnt expect much

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

matty~ wrote:

arkangel13 wrote:build defense to get sabbed out by a cov 39. hahahhahahahah PRICELESS GOATING.

We will kill defs,spies, and Mses to our hearts are fully content and for most part try to give nothing back.

ENJOY the weekend everyone.

in other words, partisan warfare..you know when that takes place right? When you are conquered.

Malx wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

matty~ wrote:

arkangel13 wrote:build defense to get sabbed out by a cov 39. hahahhahahahah PRICELESS GOATING.

We will kill defs,spies, and Mses to our hearts are fully content and for most part try to give nothing back.

ENJOY the weekend everyone.

in other words, partisan warfare..you know when that takes place right? When you are conquered.

Correction. Asymmetric Warfare, but i'm glad Rico's and OE are having fun. GO Rico's!