Page 208 of 314
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:07 am
by xDaku
Oh go ahead and mass them. Just remember that you massed the whole alliance because you got a lame reason to do it, not because you were copying us. What you're doing and what we did are two completely different things.
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:13 am
by kaboom
xDaku wrote:Oh go ahead and mass them. Just remember that you massed the whole alliance because you got a lame reason to do it, not because you were copying us. What you're doing and what we did are two completely different things.
yu massed newbies connected to DDE i mass newbies connected to FS... no dif there ... maybe there is cos ill keep this up till ya all stop what yu started.
Yu guys started this and ill try to finish this.
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:19 am
by jedi~tank
~Coyle~ wrote:Cmon JT, what the gem i know? afraid to let others know now? ha i know, ive sure told a few lol
Its really none of anyone's business and I really don't care who does or does not like it.
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:22 am
by xDaku
kaboom wrote:xDaku wrote:Oh go ahead and mass them. Just remember that you massed the whole alliance because you got a lame reason to do it, not because you were copying us. What you're doing and what we did are two completely different things.
yu massed newbies connected to DDE i mass newbies connected to FS... no dif there ... maybe there is cos ill keep this up till ya all stop what yu started.
Yu guys started this and ill try to finish this.
So you mass an alliance because it has one member that's ex-FS? Well you've got a lot of alliances to mass then, we've got some ex FS members in some strong alliances. Apparently being ex-FS means being massed by boomer. Lol. TS has no connection to FS, but believe what you want.
Tell yourself you're doing the same thing we did if it makes you feel better, fact is you're not

Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:26 am
by jedi~tank
xDaku wrote:Oh go ahead and mass them. Just remember that you massed the whole alliance because you got a lame reason to do it, not because you were copying us. What you're doing and what we did are two completely different things.
Ya'll talk too god dam much, STHU and play.
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:28 am
by kaboom
xDaku wrote:kaboom wrote:xDaku wrote:Oh go ahead and mass them. Just remember that you massed the whole alliance because you got a lame reason to do it, not because you were copying us. What you're doing and what we did are two completely different things.
yu massed newbies connected to DDE i mass newbies connected to FS... no dif there ... maybe there is cos ill keep this up till ya all stop what yu started.
Yu guys started this and ill try to finish this.
So you mass an alliance because it has one member that's ex-FS? Well you've got a lot of alliances to mass then, we've got some ex FS members in some strong alliances. Apparently being ex-FS means being massed by boomer. Lol. TS has no connection to FS, but believe what you want.
Tell yourself you're doing the same thing we did if it makes you feel better, fact is you're not

Yu can go storry tellin all yu want fact is they had members that were officers of brother when brother started to mass newbies who were officers of DDE.... thats why i send the pm GET YUR FACTS before yu start postin lies.
that they dont want to be treated like yu guys ar treatin our officers i can understand but thats to l8 now.
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:50 am
by xDaku
We massed your OFFICERS. You're massing the ALLIANCE of ONE officer of ours.
That is not a lie boomer. You are massing people that have NO connection to us, along with just ONE ex-officer of ours in that alliance. Tell yourself whatever pathetic story you want, but when you manage to wrap your head around simple math talk to me. I'm tired of your sheer stupidity. I've kept my head calm through this thread previously when it seemed it was going down the same path as before, and my posts showed that, but sometimes stupidity doesn't deserve that.
And JT, you don't like how we play, go cry about it to someone who cares. Because we don't. So here's an idea, we're playing how we want to play, how about you take your own advice and shut up about it.
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:54 am
by jedi~tank
xDaku wrote:We massed your OFFICERS. You're massing the ALLIANCE of ONE officer of ours.
That is not a lie boomer. You are massing people that have NO connection to us, along with just ONE ex-officer of ours in that alliance. Tell yourself whatever pathetic story you want, but when you manage to wrap your head around simple math talk to me. I'm tired of your sheer stupidity. I've kept my head calm through this thread previously when it seemed it was going down the same path as before, and my posts showed that, but sometimes stupidity doesn't deserve that.
And JT, you don't like how we play, go cry about it to someone who cares. Because we don't. So here's an idea, we're playing how we want to play, how about you take your own advice and shut up about it.
You are lying, there is no hits on syndicate or whatever the alliance name is in my alliance out logs. If you dont like the pending threat then send ya boy packing.
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:19 am
by xDaku
I am sorry
*Planning to mass
Papa has said he doesn't want it happening, he's an alliance member, discuss it with him. I'm talking about the idea boomer has that TS has some connection to us, because of one ex-FS/officer. Papa is/was a connection to FS, he wants to mass people connected to FS, a massing on Papa is understandable. Using FS's actions as an excuse to mass Syndicate on the other hand is NOT because the alliance is connected to us.
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:23 am
by deni
xDaku wrote: Using FS's actions as an excuse to mass Syndicate on the other hand is NOT because the alliance is connected to us.
That comment made my day.
Since when did DDE need an "excuse" to mass someone ROFL
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:29 am
by xDaku
Didn't say you need one. Read back and you'll see a lot of excuses about the threat to mass the alliance being thrown around though.
Since when did DDE members forget how to read

Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:46 am
by deni
Errrm - I guess I overestimated FS again by expecting a rational statement.
What's your problem anyways? I mean, an FS member masses small noobs who happen to be DDE officers/friends and then FS complains that DDE responds in kind?
It is the same old tune - whenever you do it, it is tactics. If someone responds the same way, it is low

Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:04 am
by kaboom
xDaku wrote:Didn't say you need one. Read back and you'll see a lot of excuses about the threat to mass the alliance being thrown around though.
Since when did DDE members forget how to read

Roket, yu can spin/talk this annyway yu want. Fact remains yu guys started massin newbie offciers of DDE, and when I say im gonna do the same to newbies with commanders and or aliances who r officers of FS its all BAD.....
Where im from we got a word for that its COWARDS.... Ya all started a war yu cant commit to and take it out on the litte ones or ones NOT part of this war yu declared.... then yu all go talk big and go fantasy storry tellin bout all those little ones yu got with yur 38/37/36 coverts .....
I say go find some balls.. and for peat sakes do something other than talk and mass younglins cos thats what yu all r doin. nothin more nothin less.
Yu all started something yu all cant finish. so either put up or shut up and if yu think we only got 5 members playin why yu all look the way you do ? you should be able to finish us off with one finger in your nose and yur other hand tied behind yur back
I know, yu all could whoop our butts if yu wanted to .. but yu all dont want to...
![[021.gif] :smt021](./images/smilies/021.gif)
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:41 am
by MEZZANINE
deni wrote:Errrm - I guess I overestimated FS again by expecting a rational statement.
What's your problem anyways? I mean, an FS member masses small noobs who happen to be DDE officers/friends and then FS complains that DDE responds in kind?
It is the same old tune - whenever you do it, it is tactics. If someone responds the same way, it is low

Here we go again, same old song. You know full well that DDE started officer massing over 2 years ago, we were the ones that responded in kind. Even then we never massed those that left their DDE COs.
As for Syndicate, well yes Papa is a friend, he left FS when we had brief period of peace with DDE, and has now left his FS CO, but his alliance have never been in FS, we dont even know them, and they seem to be small new and ascending players just like Kevs new Haven alliance.
We cant stop you massing them, but if you do you shame yourselves. We can only hope the honorable members of DDE can overrule the lesser worthy ones.
TBH the only reason I can see for BoomBoy to mass them is because he wants easy cheap kills for his ME race with Kondaz. Maybe he's going you the DDE Bully of the year award.
Re: DDE vs FS
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:46 am
by Dark Hero
deni wrote:Errrm - I guess I overestimated FS again by expecting a rational statement.
What's your problem anyways? I mean, an FS member masses small noobs who happen to be DDE officers/friends and then FS complains that DDE responds in kind?
It is the same old tune - whenever you do it, it is tactics. If someone responds the same way, it is low

Same old, same old, but....
DDE "nooby" officers gets massed, DDE member gets angry and gives a "heads up" to FS officer (ex-FS, left to help out newcomers) to mass said officer + alliance of newcomers, now ex-FS along with majority of FS is asking said angry DDE member (kaboobsmer) if he will mass the alliance.
Now that you are up to date, let boobsmer and xdaku (apparently roket according to boobsmer
![[017.gif] :smt017](./images/smilies/017.gif)
) continue their banter
ps i call boomer, boobsmer because he thinks daku is roket even though boomer wished roket to enjoy his 'boobjob' while he takes time off for a bit.
confusion multiplied I hope