Page 22 of 33

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:22 am
by Gohan
Silly TAF, you got cocky, over confident, but the jokes on you. You just got dropped...

...to rank 3 O.o

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:42 am
by dgb
Gohan wrote:Silly TAF, you got cocky, over confident, but the jokes on you. You just got dropped...

...to rank 3 O.o


lolz were not cocky at all,we do rock thoe :) ps rank 3 and at war not to bad aye :)

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:20 am
by _willie_
lol came back from vac mode... someone forgot to tell me we had a new war lol

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:52 am
by STRIKER666
Holy crap FS you might as well throw the towel in these guys and girls are noone to screw with. Your going to get smashed :smt021

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:53 am
by STRIKER666
O yea and I have a new account which I declared war with all of you FS members again.... good day

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:12 am
by BMMJ13
Drahazar wrote:And if you remember correctly, it was in fact Mathlord that said he was going to sit on us until we signed an NAP. It was TA that massed more than one person for bad farming, and it was TA that told me that they were not open to diplomacy.
That's because more than one FSF member was doing bad farming. Then you complained about yourself getting massed, as from your word you said you were making good hits, and I said I would talk to the rest of HC and look into it, yet you went and declared war before even talking to me again.
Drahazar wrote:When the clock strikes 00:00 this war is over, a 2week NAP will follow
Your last war ended with a NAP. Surprising how short ago it was yet how little you remember. Add to that, the rest of FSF all surrendered from that war as well.
Drahazar wrote:When you add in the fact that FS do not surrender or sign NAP's never have and its not likely to change, the only way this war will finish is with TA's abandonment of their sudden one hit mass policy with FS, or their surrender.

TAF will never surrender, and I find that laughable, considering 85% of FS power is a single members AC on ppt, while TAF has yet to lose anything significant nor even be dented and is still rank 3. You are more likely to find FS surrender and FSF's disbandment than that happening. As you said, that's not a threat, just from data in the past and what happens when you involve your training/sister alliances in a never ending war that you cause.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:43 am
by Lord Yojimbo
dgb wrote:
Gohan wrote:Silly TAF, you got cocky, over confident, but the jokes on you. You just got dropped...

...to rank 3 O.o


lolz were not cocky at all,we do rock thoe :) ps rank 3 and at war not to bad aye :)


Jeeze - :P He be taking the piss. :P Such a disaster to drop to rank 3 :smt047

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:25 am
by ~Les Erebus~
BMMJ13 wrote:
Drahazar wrote:And if you remember correctly, it was in fact Mathlord that said he was going to sit on us until we signed an NAP. It was TA that massed more than one person for bad farming, and it was TA that told me that they were not open to diplomacy.
That's because more than one FSF member was doing bad farming. Then you complained about yourself getting massed, as from your word you said you were making good hits, and I said I would talk to the rest of HC and look into it, yet you went and declared war before even talking to me again.
Drahazar wrote:When the clock strikes 00:00 this war is over, a 2week NAP will follow
Your last war ended with a NAP. Surprising how short ago it was yet how little you remember. Add to that, the rest of FSF all surrendered from that war as well.
Drahazar wrote:When you add in the fact that FS do not surrender or sign NAP's never have and its not likely to change, the only way this war will finish is with TA's abandonment of their sudden one hit mass policy with FS, or their surrender.

TAF will never surrender, and I find that laughable, considering 85% of FS power is a single members AC on ppt, while TAF has yet to lose anything significant nor even be dented and is still rank 3. You are more likely to find FS surrender and FSF's disbandment than that happening. As you said, that's not a threat, just from data in the past and what happens when you involve your training/sister alliances in a never ending war that you cause.


A two week NAP yes.. Not a NAP for life.. You guys we were not even that bothered by the farming, it is you guys who kepi coming to us for a "NAP" and then even though most of TAF besides TA usually have a decent amount out or someone is inactive we farm..

Farming is apart of this game. If your defense can":t hold the NAP it is simple and told to me day one in this game it will be taken. Now towards the end of the failed diplomacy Betty we were being farmed quite a bit more then before which was agitating, but we all got over it.. Then came the massing of not just the accused perpetrator but a fellow alliance mate.. At that point I believe there was going to be a Vendie but yet again another massing came from TA..

After that was talked about and things were in the mix to be settled by Vendys or repayment we seen you guys in our logs doing stupid hits, so what is a war alliance to do? We went to war. Rather FS prevails or not we were not going to sit back and become your farms.. We were being provoked for months. Now we are being bad mouthed on the forums for not keeping up with 34 people.. Do no worry we be there, just wait and shhhh with the whining..

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:42 am
by Lord Yojimbo
Les Ennemis wrote:
BMMJ13 wrote:
Drahazar wrote:And if you remember correctly, it was in fact Mathlord that said he was going to sit on us until we signed an NAP. It was TA that massed more than one person for bad farming, and it was TA that told me that they were not open to diplomacy.
That's because more than one FSF member was doing bad farming. Then you complained about yourself getting massed, as from your word you said you were making good hits, and I said I would talk to the rest of HC and look into it, yet you went and declared war before even talking to me again.
Drahazar wrote:When the clock strikes 00:00 this war is over, a 2week NAP will follow
Your last war ended with a NAP. Surprising how short ago it was yet how little you remember. Add to that, the rest of FSF all surrendered from that war as well.
Drahazar wrote:When you add in the fact that FS do not surrender or sign NAP's never have and its not likely to change, the only way this war will finish is with TA's abandonment of their sudden one hit mass policy with FS, or their surrender.

TAF will never surrender, and I find that laughable, considering 85% of FS power is a single members AC on ppt, while TAF has yet to lose anything significant nor even be dented and is still rank 3. You are more likely to find FS surrender and FSF's disbandment than that happening. As you said, that's not a threat, just from data in the past and what happens when you involve your training/sister alliances in a never ending war that you cause.


A two week NAP yes.. Not a NAP for life.. You guys we were not even that bothered by the farming, it is you guys who kepi coming to us for a "NAP" and then even though most of TAF besides TA usually have a decent amount out or someone is inactive we farm..

Farming is apart of this game. If your defense can":t hold the NAP it is simple and told to me day one in this game it will be taken. Now towards the end of the failed diplomacy Betty we were being farmed quite a bit more then before which was agitating, but we all got over it.. Then came the massing of not just the accused perpetrator but a fellow alliance mate.. At that point I believe there was going to be a Vendie but yet again another massing came from TA..

After that was talked about and things were in the mix to be settled by Vendys or repayment we seen you guys in our logs doing stupid hits, so what is a war alliance to do? We went to war. Rather FS prevails or not we were not going to sit back and become your farms.. We were being provoked for months. Now we are being bad mouthed on the forums for not keeping up with 34 people.. Do no worry we be there, just wait and shhhh with the whining..


Let me put it as concisely as possible - your farming was excessive and unprofitable and then your feigned openness to diplomacy while using aggressive actions in massing provoked this whole situation - we can keep throwing spin back and forth all day long if you so wish but the resultant war says it all. TAF are on top and we will keep the pressure up no matter what in order to preserve our right to defend our members :-$

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:52 am
by ~Les Erebus~
as we will do the same :D and yes right now you are on Top :smt050 no-one is disputing that :smt050 war came that's great so let just you know... STATS not failed attempts at more he said she said diplomacy.. Take what you get and don't throw a fit aye? We will see in the end... :smt060

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:56 am
by Lord Yojimbo
Les Ennemis wrote:as we will do the same :D and yes right now you are on Top :smt050 no-one is disputing that :smt050 war came that's great so let just you know... STATS not failed attempts at more he said she said diplomacy.. Take what you get and don't throw a fit aye? We will see in the end... :smt060


We shall see indeed :smt047 :smt021 :smt064 :-D

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:08 am
by BMMJ13
Les Ennemis wrote:
BMMJ13 wrote:
Drahazar wrote:And if you remember correctly, it was in fact Mathlord that said he was going to sit on us until we signed an NAP. It was TA that massed more than one person for bad farming, and it was TA that told me that they were not open to diplomacy.
That's because more than one FSF member was doing bad farming. Then you complained about yourself getting massed, as from your word you said you were making good hits, and I said I would talk to the rest of HC and look into it, yet you went and declared war before even talking to me again.
Drahazar wrote:When the clock strikes 00:00 this war is over, a 2week NAP will follow
Your last war ended with a NAP. Surprising how short ago it was yet how little you remember. Add to that, the rest of FSF all surrendered from that war as well.
Drahazar wrote:When you add in the fact that FS do not surrender or sign NAP's never have and its not likely to change, the only way this war will finish is with TA's abandonment of their sudden one hit mass policy with FS, or their surrender.

TAF will never surrender, and I find that laughable, considering 85% of FS power is a single members AC on ppt, while TAF has yet to lose anything significant nor even be dented and is still rank 3. You are more likely to find FS surrender and FSF's disbandment than that happening. As you said, that's not a threat, just from data in the past and what happens when you involve your training/sister alliances in a never ending war that you cause.


A two week NAP yes.. Not a NAP for life.. You guys we were not even that bothered by the farming, it is you guys who kepi coming to us for a "NAP" and then even though most of TAF besides TA usually have a decent amount out or someone is inactive we farm..

Farming is apart of this game. If your defense can":t hold the NAP it is simple and told to me day one in this game it will be taken. Now towards the end of the failed diplomacy Betty we were being farmed quite a bit more then before which was agitating, but we all got over it.. Then came the massing of not just the accused perpetrator but a fellow alliance mate.. At that point I believe there was going to be a Vendie but yet again another massing came from TA..

After that was talked about and things were in the mix to be settled by Vendys or repayment we seen you guys in our logs doing stupid hits, so what is a war alliance to do? We went to war. Rather FS prevails or not we were not going to sit back and become your farms.. We were being provoked for months. Now we are being bad mouthed on the forums for not keeping up with 34 people.. Do no worry we be there, just wait and shhhh with the whining..

That's complete **Filtered**. FS were getting farmed because FS had nothing built and lots of income. FS were the ones who kept complaining about hits, then complained when you got massed for making bad hits in retaliation. Those in FS farming TAF were all making bad hits, like 1/40-1/80 of a defense when normal naq hits are 1/20. Others were doing 5 hits on a 40 tril defense with a 20 tril strike trying to get AB. You have sat back and are our farms. Your entire alliance is statless and I doubt you can play the game normally, but if that is how you wish to play the game fine, it is no problem to TA as we are playing the game same we have been playing, and less FS are in our logs now than before the war.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:20 am
by ~Les Erebus~
LMAO Betty come on now.. You know as well as I know that most of the heavy farming was at the end of a huge FAILED diplomatic mess..

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:51 am
by BMMJ13
Les Ennemis wrote:LMAO Betty come on now.. You know as well as I know that most of the heavy farming was at the end of a huge FAILED diplomatic mess..

You mean after a FS member massed over a single farm hit? Then we farmed each other, then FS started making stupid hits and got massed for it. Yes, FS let this happen by allowing a member to mass a TA member over a single hit, then get pissed when TAF mass back for multiple bad hits.

Sure is a lot of hypocrisy and double talk going on in FS. We don't do NAPs at all, oh that was only a 2 week nap. We will only mass those who mass us, oh wait lets declare war. TAF is bullying by massing over multiple bad hits, but us massing over a single good hit is fine. :roll:

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:01 am
by doc holliday
We shoulda just massed free spirit. He was making the worst hits. Mini massing for naq. Plus he's a multi I guess