Page 23 of 85

Re: The Only Fuall Vs TJP Thread Of Disscussion

Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 10:07 am
by SVaRuN
You must understand him Thak...but then again you cant...he s a barbarian... :-k






Just a rpg mister bebita not ment to offend you or anything like that ;)



Blue

Re: The Only Fuall Vs TJP Thread Of Disscussion

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:00 pm
by _Stu_
thicks wrote:
Hansbrough wrote:Sorry thicks... you are my friend, but you are indeed a traitor, ALL those who surrender to ttf and did not leave the game are being labeled as such; there are no exceptions... delta and dde have both agreed to go after all accounts who surrender instead of just hitting vacation mode. There are no easy ways out of this war.

If people do not like it, then tell jason to make it so wars are auto-declared in some fashion and cannot be not-accepted, and where winning and losing come with repercussions that are harsh, such as complete resetting of all accounts by the losing alliance, that is THE only way to end this war.



Sorry my 'friend' Hansbrough, but I refute that.

I left Alpha on July 4th, I surrendered to TJP 3 months later on October 17th. So during this time I was a Lonewolf.

And I have had enough the following are the reasons I finally left Alpha.

1) During the war with CoTO/TO, after numerous requests that Barbs stop hitting Alpha members I decided to following the instructions that I was informed were issued by FUALL command

'farm FUALL members so the other side doesn't get the naq'.

I did this - and Reborn decided to mass both my ascended and main accounts.

Where I was different I returned the naq to the players - Barbs kept the naq and built up his account.

Reborn got away without paying anything - I didn't respond.

2) Before Don left Alpha I was 2IC - everything appeared fine - I in good faith intended to stay with Alpha, loyal as always.

But when Don left ETL placed Stu in charged - I got automatically demoted by Stu - reasons been I was not active enough on the forum (since he deleted the forum)

So with the massing by Reborn and reduction in rank I finally decided that Alpha was no longer where I should be.

I had various alliance try to get me to join but due to my loyality to Alpha I didn't join.

I only surrendered to TJP when I decided to join a friends alliance so they would not be hit by TJP.

So who is the traitor to who?


You were given many a chance to improve thicks, you were active on the forum, but not ingame, ingame counts the most to me. Being demoted does not mean you should of left Alpha; that was your choice.

P.S, the forum was never deleted. it was refreshed and repaired.

Re: The Only Fuall Vs TJP Thread Of Disscussion

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:56 am
by pianomutt20000
_Stu_ wrote:
thicks wrote:
Hansbrough wrote:Sorry thicks... you are my friend, but you are indeed a traitor, ALL those who surrender to ttf and did not leave the game are being labeled as such; there are no exceptions... delta and dde have both agreed to go after all accounts who surrender instead of just hitting vacation mode. There are no easy ways out of this war.

If people do not like it, then tell jason to make it so wars are auto-declared in some fashion and cannot be not-accepted, and where winning and losing come with repercussions that are harsh, such as complete resetting of all accounts by the losing alliance, that is THE only way to end this war.



Sorry my 'friend' Hansbrough, but I refute that.

I left Alpha on July 4th, I surrendered to TJP 3 months later on October 17th. So during this time I was a Lonewolf.

And I have had enough the following are the reasons I finally left Alpha.

1) During the war with CoTO/TO, after numerous requests that Barbs stop hitting Alpha members I decided to following the instructions that I was informed were issued by FUALL command

'farm FUALL members so the other side doesn't get the naq'.

I did this - and Reborn decided to mass both my ascended and main accounts.

Where I was different I returned the naq to the players - Barbs kept the naq and built up his account.

Reborn got away without paying anything - I didn't respond.

2) Before Don left Alpha I was 2IC - everything appeared fine - I in good faith intended to stay with Alpha, loyal as always.

But when Don left ETL placed Stu in charged - I got automatically demoted by Stu - reasons been I was not active enough on the forum (since he deleted the forum)

So with the massing by Reborn and reduction in rank I finally decided that Alpha was no longer where I should be.

I had various alliance try to get me to join but due to my loyality to Alpha I didn't join.

I only surrendered to TJP when I decided to join a friends alliance so they would not be hit by TJP.

So who is the traitor to who?


You were given many a chance to improve thicks, you were active on the forum, but not ingame, ingame counts the most to me. Being demoted does not mean you should of left Alpha; that was your choice.

P.S, the forum was never deleted. it was refreshed and repaired.




Common stu, show thicks some love :lol: Maybe he left because of your charming personality?

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:51 pm
by pianomutt20000
GunZ wrote:
pianomutt20000 wrote:I hereby retract my offer of surrender for the time being 8)




Thank you for the 1 naq Gunz. :smt098


General Chaos, I took a screenshot for ya.

:lol:

Bill



You are quite welcome ...as I said when I sent you 10 naq

hope that extra bit makes you feel better .


The little gesture above shows you to be the classless dolt you have always been

ps...I note you also said
I hereby retract my offer of surrender for the time being



Trust me...IT IS PERMANENT





Oh noes, is gunz mad at me? Deciding to have his minions bully around helpless alliances, while not having the CLASS to respond to requests for communication.



Damn, i'm sorry...Guess I missed the memo about being respectful to disrespectful players. Damn. Must remember that.


Not like it matters :lol: But the gesture was fully meant :)

It's so nice to see the walls crumble around you isn't it gunz, back before I left...

ETL descended? NEVER.
Geisha, the default leader of omega inactive...NO
Gunz in charge ...Laughable. (of course, you are never around so it's still laughable)


Saying to others that the gesture is why you never accepted my surrender...bs.




It's been months, and I put up with a lot of crap from you all. But when you threaten an
innocent alliance, well, that made me leave that alliance rather then subject them to your
childish outbursts.




But of course, if you wish to admit you are wrong. Perhaps I'll let you accept it, just one applogy for the
actions of those below you.. To AK of course, they were the ones threatened.




Bill
(still on topic, as I left my surrender open for them in the event they do what's right)




BTW
:smt098

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:18 pm
by GunZ
Bill...we are playing a game here. Get over yourself with the drama queen bit.

I have always been civil with you . You asked for 1 naq ( that I never accepted , and did not owe you ) but I sent you 10 to be a nice guy.
Then you come to this forum and gloat and flip me the bird.

Now you wish to insult and impugn and ridicule. I will not respond in kind.

It is A GAME Bill , play it ...the melodramatic forum insults just make you look small .

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:20 pm
by pianomutt20000
GunZ wrote:Bill...we are playing a game here. Get over yourself with the drama queen bit.

I have always been civil with you . You asked for 1 naq ( that I never accepted , and did not owe you ) but I sent you 10 to be a nice guy.
Then you come to this forum and gloat and flip me the bird.

Now you wish to insult and impugn and ridicule. I will not respond in kind.

It is A GAME Bill , play it ...the melodramatic forum insults just make you look small .




You have not been civil, no need to lower yourself with lies :D

Civility requires entertaining inquiries. You choose to ignore.

Ordering attacks on innocent alliances, regardless of what you say, is wrong.

If you didn't, you allowed it to happen under the guise of hurting me.
I see you don't address it, shame really. I would have thought better of you......6 months ago.

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:21 pm
by pianomutt20000
GunZ wrote:Bill...we are playing a game here. Get over yourself with the drama queen bit.

I have always been civil with you . You asked for 1 naq ( that I never accepted , and did not owe you ) but I sent you 10 to be a nice guy.
Then you come to this forum and gloat and flip me the bird.

Now you wish to insult and impugn and ridicule. I will not respond in kind.

It is A GAME Bill , play it ...the melodramatic forum insults just make you look small .



BTW. I sent you 1 naq in the open. You never sent it back, so yeah, you accepted it.

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:26 pm
by GunZ
If so , I am still 9 naq up you, lol.

Can we leave this there and just play the game and stop the personal crap now ?

I am willing if you are .

IT IS A GAME ...PLAY IT.

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:45 pm
by pianomutt20000
Agreed.



Look, sorry about being so rude. I have a lot of crap going on in RL and things are not going well.

Meh, get your hits in now. 36 hours i'll be on vac mode.


Bill

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:52 pm
by GunZ
We have said our peace and it is ended. I never have disliked the person you are...hell, I like everyone, lol.
I just take exception to unnecessary insults and / or name calling.

That is what is messing this game up...it is not the wars, or the alliances, or the super alliances...it is people taking it too seriously . Sometimes we all need to think a bit before we speak...including me.

Good luck in the real world Bill.

Re: The Only Fuall Vs TJP Thread Of Disscussion

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:25 pm
by David Bliss
I agree.

Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here 1

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:34 am
by TheRook
nah you dont owe me anything...

you just need to sort your **Filtered** out so you can get back here and I can carry on beating you at SGW :P

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:31 am
by GeneralChaos
Well when you leave 1 alliance we are at war with, and join another we are hostile with what the hell do you expect to happen, get a dam clue already

FUALL stop accepting these dam surrenders, you KNOW they are just building resources to send to TJP, screw them all.

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:01 am
by TheRook
Gen Chaos

thats not true at all...

Field Marshall is quitting the war due to RL circumstances and as an (ex)member of the Warlords of Briton we know he will not be funding anyone in the war...

Arc_Trooper is fed up of the war and as such restarted The Pub alliance which is nothing to do with the Warlords of Briton so his surrender from the war is valid and he also will not be sending resources to anyone in the war...

Doparen was dragged into this because he join The Pub with arc to fight AOE and isn't involved with the Warlords of Briton or the Server war... (and neither are other members of The Pub)

So each surrender is entirely valid...

Rek can you reconsider Arcs request to surrender (his access to our forums (Warlord)has been altered) as he is no longer part of our Alliance and as such he is surendering and no longer taking part in the Server war...

Ignore his sense of humour (he's dutch :P) and its not out of a lack of respect that he posted the way he did... it just follows 99.99% of the way he posts all the time

Anyhow

Cheers and good luck with the rest of the surrenders

TheRook
Warlords of Briton

Re: Surrender Terms: For Surrendering To FUALL Post Here

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:05 am
by GeneralChaos
I find it funny, that you say hes left your alliance and no longer part of you, yet your the one here asking us to accept his surrender,

If REK sets an alliance as hostile, then by all hell where going to mass them, if someone then decides to "try surrender" then join said hostile alliance, then there surrender is void, like running from 1 enemy to join another.

I still strongly advise FUALL from this day fourth that no more surrenders should be accepted, they all wanted in on the war to get a piece of FUALL, and now cant run the long term, hard luck.