Page 24 of 31

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:26 pm
by Mathlord
Colonel Jack Oneill wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:40 am WOW, I thought TF was always viewed as the Protectors/ Good Guys of Gatewars

But Mathlord Implying you would mass an alliance voting for the leading alliance in a house, and a new alliance just starting out.

That is pretty sad man

I guess we should threathen, or IMPLY to mass them as well.....no wait...I wont sink to that level
lol

I exceedingly politely asked EK to not pick sides in our house dispute. For the record, if you choose to vote for an enemy alliance trying to take a house from us during a war, then you are aiding that enemy and committing a hostile act against us. Plenty of others would just have massed anyone for not voting for them in the house. I don't see how this is shocking :lol:

Nice try on the public relations game though. We never promised to be anyone's protectors, only that we'll deal with people fairly and not bully smaller alliances into conflicts they did not want. There's a reason we normally only war OE, DDE or Mayhem. And just as any other alliance would be rightfully displeased with someone helping their enemy take a house from them, we too do not take too kindly to that.

Something tells me CJO is just unhappy that he's going to lose his house bonus again...

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:49 am
by dark lord tacoma
Image

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:28 am
by Colonel Jack Oneill
Mathlord wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:26 pm
Colonel Jack Oneill wrote: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:40 am WOW, I thought TF was always viewed as the Protectors/ Good Guys of Gatewars

But Mathlord Implying you would mass an alliance voting for the leading alliance in a house, and a new alliance just starting out.

That is pretty sad man

I guess we should threathen, or IMPLY to mass them as well.....no wait...I wont sink to that level
lol

I exceedingly politely asked EK to not pick sides in our house dispute. For the record, if you choose to vote for an enemy alliance trying to take a house from us during a war, then you are aiding that enemy and committing a hostile act against us. Plenty of others would just have massed anyone for not voting for them in the house. I don't see how this is shocking :lol:

Nice try on the public relations game though. We never promised to be anyone's protectors, only that we'll deal with people fairly and not bully smaller alliances into conflicts they did not want. There's a reason we normally only war OE, DDE or Mayhem. And just as any other alliance would be rightfully displeased with someone helping their enemy take a house from them, we too do not take too kindly to that.

Something tells me CJO is just unhappy that he's going to lose his house bonus again...

LOL, CJO unhappy, losing house doesn't affect me at all, very few in TF have the balls to mass me anyways.

You can try and be all GW noble, you know what you implied


The only one taking this house helps is you, and you know it. But REALLY you need all the help you can get :smt025

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:54 am
by Mathlord
Actually Lofn is a great house for you to offset our Flight House bonus. It puts your motherships in a more favorable position against ours. There's a reason you keep trying to go back here ;) I'm just happy that you trying to take/keep the house means you're getting some people to build slightly less trivial things. All positive.

Not trying to be GW noble here, just apparently explaining obvious truths about war and politics. In other news, this has been a really exciting afternoon of attacking people who won't attack back. Yay...

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:07 pm
by Mathlord
There we go CJO! Came off your PPT threw a ton of turns at me...I was lucky to keep the defense though you got my mothership and a ton of repair naq...I really wish I had a mouse at work haha

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:11 pm
by Colonel Jack Oneill
Mathlord wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:07 pm There we go CJO! Came off your PPT threw a ton of turns at me...I was lucky to keep the defense though you got my mothership and a ton of repair naq...I really wish I had a mouse at work haha

You are **Filtered** retarded fast :) :smt025

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:13 pm
by Colonel Jack Oneill
Mathlord wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:54 am Actually Lofn is a great house for you to offset our Flight House bonus. It puts your motherships in a more favorable position against ours. There's a reason you keep trying to go back here ;) I'm just happy that you trying to take/keep the house means you're getting some people to build slightly less trivial things. All positive.

Not trying to be GW noble here, just apparently explaining obvious truths about war and politics. In other news, this has been a really exciting afternoon of attacking people who won't attack back. Yay...

Your 10% increase just about makes our MS the same, and you are the only one with an MS that is worth anything :)

really the people that it could benefit is TL , but they left to take our house, so they still have to face of MS , which is why they never mass and sit wreck, except for Mr.Banks crazy bastard build many times a day

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:26 pm
by harchester
I am banks I build 8times daily.

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:36 pm
by Colonel Jack Oneill
harchester wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:26 pm I am banks I build 8times daily.
Nah if you where Banks, you would 0 me in a second. :smt025

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:06 pm
by Tok`ra
Mathlord wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:54 am , this has been a really exciting afternoon of attacking people who won't attack back. Yay...
Sounds like hitting nost of taae/tats and half of TA :p

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:17 pm
by dark lord tacoma
Tok`ra wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:06 pm
Mathlord wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:54 am , this has been a really exciting afternoon of attacking people who won't attack back. Yay...
Sounds like hitting nost of taae/tats and half of TA :p
Arnt you on ppt :smt019

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:32 pm
by Colonel Jack Oneill
Mathlord wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:54 am Actually Lofn is a great house for you to offset our Flight House bonus. It puts your motherships in a more favorable position against ours. There's a reason you keep trying to go back here ;) I'm just happy that you trying to take/keep the house means you're getting some people to build slightly less trivial things. All positive.

Not trying to be GW noble here, just apparently explaining obvious truths about war and politics. In other news, this has been a really exciting afternoon of attacking people who won't attack back. Yay...
And I have hit back twice now , FYI. But **Filtered** hell, I cant 0 you

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:45 pm
by Colonel Jack Oneill
TL has stuff to kill , lucky for you. between NOX and that **Filtered** Blood war meter, I cant be assed to do it

Tomorrow morning
:smt025

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:46 pm
by Colonel Jack Oneill
Colonel Jack Oneill wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:32 pm
Mathlord wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:54 am Actually Lofn is a great house for you to offset our Flight House bonus. It puts your motherships in a more favorable position against ours. There's a reason you keep trying to go back here ;) I'm just happy that you trying to take/keep the house means you're getting some people to build slightly less trivial things. All positive.

Not trying to be GW noble here, just apparently explaining obvious truths about war and politics. In other news, this has been a really exciting afternoon of attacking people who won't attack back. Yay...
And I have hit back 3 times now , FYI. But **Filtered** hell, I cant 0 you

Re: TF vs Olympus

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:32 am
by Tok`ra
Dark Lord Tacoma wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:17 pm
Tok`ra wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:06 pm
Mathlord wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:54 am , this has been a really exciting afternoon of attacking people who won't attack back. Yay...
Sounds like hitting nost of taae/tats and half of TA :p
Arnt you on ppt :smt019
Yes, which is more activity than Ive seen from quite a large portion of the TF.