Page 26 of 33

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:29 pm
by Brosan
Drahazar wrote:...although one of the people that got it forgot to untrain a load of normal standard attack troops, so he lost 7.5mill of them on a less than 1T defense


It's ok to call me by name. You're absolutely right. I lost tons of troops due to careless setup. But maybe I do not value UUs like you guys are. I just sold +500mil UUs at rock bottom prices at SGW market and even below that to fellow TAF members. That's just three days production for me. Hopefully less, if your fellow members remain inactive and leave tons of UUs in the open for raids.

... or maybe I just crawl in a corner right now and weep for those 7.5 mil UUs flushed down the toilet just like that. :smt010 :smt089
You FS dudes and gals are sooooo mean :smt022

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:31 pm
by Mathlord
Drahazar wrote:Yeah i decided to let nox take over, which is nothing you can complain about, i mean you picked your house purely so you could do the same lol


Our house means you have to work a little harder to mass us, but remember war settings negate all of that. Aaaaaand who had a war setting from me all last night but did nothing? Oh that's right, you...funny how that works.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:34 pm
by sarparto
Hyourinmaru wrote:So i had my fun with Wheel of Jeopardy.
needless to say he was too good for me but still was damn good fun.

see y'all in about 3 weeks. til then behave and have a blast :)


Forgot to applaud you for this effort when it happened. Take's balls that clang to go after woj! Have fun on your time away!

Also, would like to applaud Madclown's previous efforts. He's been in logs a decent amount and shown great persistence and tenacity. Gotta be honest I'm not 100% sure what tenacity means, but it was meant in a good way.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:35 pm
by Drahazar
Mathlord wrote:
Drahazar wrote:Yeah i decided to let nox take over, which is nothing you can complain about, i mean you picked your house purely so you could do the same lol


Our house means you have to work a little harder to mass us, but remember war settings negate all of that. Aaaaaand who had a war setting from me all last night but did nothing? Oh that's right, you...funny how that works.


Might as well save uu for Bloodwar ...

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:38 pm
by Mathlord
Drahazar wrote:
Mathlord wrote:
Drahazar wrote:Yeah i decided to let nox take over, which is nothing you can complain about, i mean you picked your house purely so you could do the same lol


Our house means you have to work a little harder to mass us, but remember war settings negate all of that. Aaaaaand who had a war setting from me all last night but did nothing? Oh that's right, you...funny how that works.


Might as well save uu for Bloodwar ...


Might want to get some uu first ;) I don't even know if enough attacks happen in this "war" to get us into bloodwar...we shall see...

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:46 pm
by BMMJ13
I like this "war" so far. Farmed 373 tril in the 5 days I was off ppt. Had 6 ats used against me, where I lost a scary 309k Supers. Even with me massing that 18 tril defense while he was online and repairing, it hasn't messed up my profit margin too much. :smt047

[spoiler]Military Records and Achievements
AS OF Sep 13, 18:02
(be very sure!)
Your Achievements (war points per in brakets)
Attack Mercs Killed (30) 681,021
Defence Mercs Killed (10) 74,321,971
Attack Soldiers Killed(60) 0
Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 5,508,050
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 499,866
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 128,340,970
Spies Killed(50) 11,873,629
Spy Killers Killed(50) 989
Mothership Weapons Destroyed(300) 1,046,299
Mothership Shields Destroyed(300) 1,049,058
Mothership Fleets Destroyed(200) 129,349
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 146,922
Planets Taken(5000) 1
Naquadah Stolen(0.0001) 373,377,951,749,001
Untrained Kidnapped(50) 4,525,375
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att)(0.0001) 1,900,284,810,778
Attack Turns Used(1) 8,650
TOTAL WAR EXPERIENCE POINTS 52,714,230,115

Your Failures
Attacking Mercenaries Lost 432,072,472
Defending Mercenaries Lost 432,831
Away Team Lost 0
Home Guard Lost 0
Super Soldier Lost 132,238,863
Super Guards Lost 309,405
Covert Ops Lost 0
CounterIntelligence Agents Lost 0
Mothership Weapons Lost 444,095
Mothership Shields Lost 1,146,141
Mothership Fleets Lost 0
Planet Defences Lost 0
Planets Lost 0
Naquadah Lost 0
Untrained Lost 0
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att on You) 0
Attack Turns Used Against You 6
Plus/Minus 0[/spoiler]

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:50 pm
by Mathlord
And while we are talking about profit margins and killing more than we're losing, how many weapons and how many defenses have you actually destroyed drahazar? See I know you've lost a nice couple hundred million weapons this war from me alone (or from selling while I was hitting you)...and I know I've lost a grand total of 11.2 million weapons from four sabs in the entire war. How does that factor into your grand calculations?

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:29 pm
by doc holliday
It doesn't factor. He omitted those from his calculations as you could see. Duh. ](*,) 8-[

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:08 pm
by ~wolverine~
you guys oughta calm down a bit, have some fun from the war and enjoy it.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:18 am
by Lithium
selling uu for FS players incase they cant find in market :) same price :)

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:24 am
by Halisstra
This thread is beginning to sound like pure petty **Filtered**, come to a compromise or something gentlemen, it's boring me now

And by compromise I do not mean 'give us what we want or we'll sit on you'

^ no that was not a personal attack on anyone before I get lots of catty replies.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:19 am
by dgb
Halisstra wrote:This thread is beginning to sound like pure petty **Filtered**, come to a compromise or something gentlemen, it's boring me now

And by compromise I do not mean 'give us what we want or we'll sit on you'

^ no that was not a personal attack on anyone before I get lots of catty replies.


I agree with you but compromise goes both ways :)

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:47 am
by thorsworld1
Halisstra wrote:This thread is beginning to sound like pure petty **Filtered**, come to a compromise or something gentlemen, it's boring me now

And by compromise I do not mean 'give us what we want or we'll sit on you'

^ no that was not a personal attack on anyone before I get lots of catty replies.


Then just say you give up and accept that 1 hit on a defended account (not 0 def account) = removal of defense, then its a chance you take but don't go complaining when your def is gone

Your alliance made choices, now make another (hopefully a better one)

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:08 am
by RepliMagni
thorsworld1 wrote:accept that 1 hit on a defended account (not 0 def account) = removal of defense


TAF have a 1-hit mass policy? Now that is ironic ;)

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:35 am
by thorsworld1
RepliMagni wrote:
thorsworld1 wrote:accept that 1 hit on a defended account (not 0 def account) = removal of defense


TAF have a 1-hit mass policy? Now that is ironic ;)


No that's not..... what I am saying, if you read a previous posting I made I suggested that it was a possible way that FS could end this dispute, I am just re-iterating that possible acceptable standard that they may accept